Intralesional Steroid Injection Versus Voice Therapy in Management of Vocal Nodules

January 15, 2026 updated by: Nada Ali Kamel, Assiut University

Intralesional Steroid Injection Versus Accent Method of Voice Therapy in Management of Vocal Nodules: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Vocal nodules represent 16 % of benign vocal fold lesions.They are caused by chronic voice abuse or misuse and often occur in children and adult females. The resultant dysphonia leads to personal, social and occupational problems.

The first line of treatment is voice rest and voice therapy. The Accent method is a holistic technique for behavior readjustment voice therapy which targets various voice parameters as loudness, pitch and timbre. However, voice rest and voice therapy are sometimes difficult to be carried out in patients with voice-related occupations. So, complete resolution may not be possible in all patients. When voice therapy is inefficient, resection is performed by laryngeal microsurgery under general anesthesia. However, the role of surgery is much restricted.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

An intralesional steroid injection to vocal nodules has come to the forefront as another treatment choice. Steroids decrease the synthesis and maturation of collagen, suppress fibroblast function, and inhibit the antibacterial phagocytic action of some defense cells and vasoactive substances release.These actions are considered to be functional for treating vocal nodules. Many studies, investigated steroid injection in benign lesions including nodules, reported that 93-100% of the nodules either disappeared or improved. The reported nodules recurrence rate after 2 years was 26.7- 31%.

However, to our knowledge, no previous study has compared vocal nodule steroid injection with a group receiving voice therapy to accurately assess the clinical role of vocal fold steroid injection.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Asyut, Egypt
        • Assiut University Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- 1- Female patients diagnosed with bilateral vocal fold soft edematous nodules with preserved or minimally impacted stroboscopic waves , don't exceed base 2.5 mm and apex .5mm.

2- age: 18-55 years. 3- Normal articulation, resonance and language ability. 4- Normal hearing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1- Previous voice therapy or micro-phono-surgery. 2- Use of drugs (which may cause changes in laryngeal function, mucosa, or muscle activity).

    3- History of allergies, lung disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, or other concomitant vocal pathology (e.g., vocal polyp and vocal cyst).

    4- Current psychiatric, neurological conditions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: study group
female patients with vocal fold nodules undergoing intralesional steroid injection
0.1- 0.3 mm percutaneous intralesional injection
Other Names:
  • Epirelefan
Active Comparator: control group
female patients with vocal fold nodules undergoing Smith Accent voice therapy
regular sessions of smith accent voice therapy (about 24 sessions, twice session / week) for 3 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective measurements of patient's assessment of voice severity
Time Frame: Before intervention
Measurements of scores of Arabic Voice Handicap Index
Before intervention
Objective measurements of vocal nodules size
Time Frame: before intervention
Measurements of base and rise of nodules using videostroboscopic examination
before intervention
Objective measurements of vocal pitch
Time Frame: Before intervention
Measurements of acoustic analysis: fundamental frequency (Hz)
Before intervention
Objective measurements of vocal waveform frequency aperiodicity
Time Frame: Before intervention
Measurements of acoustic analysis: jitter (%)
Before intervention
Objective measurements of vocal waveform amplitude aperiodicity
Time Frame: Before intervention
Measurements of acoustic analysis: shimmer (dB)
Before intervention
Objective measurements of vocal waveform periodicity to aperiodicity ratio
Time Frame: Before intervention
Measurements of acoustic analysis : harmonic to noise ratio(dB)
Before intervention
Objective measurements of glottal efficiency
Time Frame: Before intervention
Measurements of aerodynamic parameter : Maximum phonation time (seconds)
Before intervention
Subjective measurements of severity of dysphonia
Time Frame: Before intervention
Measurements of change of Grade of Dysphonia, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Straining by auditory perceptual assessment using the GRBAS scale. Grades ranging from 0 (normal) up to 3 (severe)
Before intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Subjective measurements of severity dysphonia
Time Frame: 1 week and 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after intervention
Measurements of change of Grade of Dysphonia, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Straining by auditory perceptual assessment using the GRBAS scale. Grades ranging from 0 (normal) up to 3 (severe)
1 week and 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after intervention
Change in subjective measurements of patient's assessment of voice severity
Time Frame: 1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after intervention
Measurements of change in scores of Arabic Voice Handicap Index
1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after intervention
Change in objective measurements of vocal nodules size
Time Frame: 1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after intervention
Measurements of change in base and rise of nodules using videostroboscopic examination
1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after intervention
Change in objective measurements of vocal pitch
Time Frame: 1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after intervention
Measurements of change in acoustic analysis including fundamental frequency (Hz)
1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after intervention
Change in objective measurements of vocal waveform frequency aperiodicity
Time Frame: 1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after intervention
Measurements of change in acoustic analysis : jitter (%)
1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after intervention
Change in objective measurements of vocal waveform amplitude aperiodicity
Time Frame: 1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after intervention
Measurements of change in acoustic analysis : shimmer (dB)
1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after intervention
Change in objective measurements of vocal waveform periodicity to aperiodicity ratio
Time Frame: 1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after intervention
Change in measurements of acoustic analysis : harmonic to noise ratio (dB)
1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after intervention
Change in objective measurements of glottal efficiency
Time Frame: 1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after intervention
Measurements of change in aerodynamic parameter: Maximum phonation time (seconds)
1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nada A Kamel, M.Sc., Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 29, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 28, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vocal Nodules in Adults

Clinical Trials on Smith Accent method of voice therapy

Subscribe