Does Improving Vagal Tone Increase Mitochondrial Bioenergetics

May 27, 2021 updated by: Chelimsky, Gisela Grotewold, Medical College of Wisconsin
This study evaluates the effect of auricular neurostimulation on mitochondrial bioenergetics and inflammation through vagal nerve modulation via non-invasive percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulator in children with functional gastrointestinal disorders.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In understanding the pathophysiology of pediatric functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID), it has been documented that subjects have decreased vagal tone. Vagal tone in turn modulates mitochondrial bioenergetics and plays a role in anti inflammatory effects. Further defining these brain-body connections that underlie FGID's could help guide future treatment.

The investigators postulate that a 4 week neuro-stimulation with an Electro Auricular Device that has already shown to increase vagal tone will produce an increase in mitochondrial bioenergetics and decrease in inflammatory markers in this patient group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Medical College of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 18 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English-speaking and able to verbalize their condition and concerns about nausea, pain and other symptoms
  • Subjects will meet Rome IV criteria for functional nausea, irritable bowel syndrome, dyspepsia or functional abdominal pain as determined by a pediatric gastroenterologist
  • Patients must have an intact external ear that is free of infection or severe dermatological conditions, have stable vital signs for their respective age, no history of seizures and no currently implanted electrical device

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mental retardation or pervasive developmental disorder or epilepsy
  • Psychosis
  • Genetic or chromosomal disorders
  • Pregnancy
  • Subjects who admit to substance abuse during screening
  • Patients with findings of peptic ulcer disease, H.pylori gastritis, celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, allergic disorders, or any chronic condition or medication that may cause nausea or pain
  • Patients who are treated with opioids or who had any changes in their medical regimen in the past four weeks prior to study
  • Patients with a history of allergy to adhesives

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Percutaneous neurostimulation
Subjects will have 4 weeks of active therapy.
Percutaneous neurostimulation using NSS-2 Bridge device
Other Names:
  • NSS-2 Bridge by Innovative Health Solutions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To Measure Different Mitochondrial Bioenergetic Markers, Including Basal Respiratory Capacity
Time Frame: Baseline, at follow-up visit 4 (Week 4) and at follow up visit 5 (Week 8 or 12)
Blood draw will be tested for mitochondrial function, including basal respiratory capacity, ATP production and spare respiration and to detect changes in protein which can be an indicator for inflammation. Basal Respiratory Capacity (pmol/min) is better when value is higher.
Baseline, at follow-up visit 4 (Week 4) and at follow up visit 5 (Week 8 or 12)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To Measure Heart Rate Variability
Time Frame: At date of baseline assessment (beginning of therapy). Also assessed at follow-up visit 4 (Week 4) and 5 (Week 8 or 12)
EKG tracing will be used to analyze Heart Rate Variability as an indirect measure of vagal nerve output and central autonomic control.
At date of baseline assessment (beginning of therapy). Also assessed at follow-up visit 4 (Week 4) and 5 (Week 8 or 12)
To Measure Functional Disability Inventory
Time Frame: At date of baseline assessment (beginning of therapy). Also assessed at follow-up visit 4 (Week 4) and visit 5 (8 or 12)

The Functional Disability Inventory (FDI) questionnaire will be used to assess change in symptoms. Participants will rank physical trouble or difficulty completing 15 different daily activities (Eating regular meals, Being at school all day, Walking up stairs, etc.) on a scale of 0-4.

Scale:0-No trouble

  1. A little trouble
  2. Some Trouble
  3. A lot of Trouble
  4. Impossible

Higher scores (4) indicate more difficulty functioning due to physical health. The total score ranges from 0 to 60 among 15 questions. The individual score for all 15 questions are added together for the total score. If all 15 questions are answered as 0- no trouble then the total score would be 0 (lowest difficulty). If all 15 questions are answered as 4-Impossible, then the total score would be 60 (highest difficulty). An assortment of answers will fall within this 0-60 range depending on the difficulty level answer for each question.

At date of baseline assessment (beginning of therapy). Also assessed at follow-up visit 4 (Week 4) and visit 5 (8 or 12)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gisela Chelimsky, MD, Medical College of Wisconsin

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 6, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 24, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 24, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dyspepsia

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous neurostimulation

3
Subscribe