Pilocarpine Use After Kahook Goniotomy (PAACK)

November 7, 2025 updated by: Montefiore Medical Center

A Prospective Randomized Control Trial of Pilocarpine Use After Combined Cataract/Kahook Dual Blade Surgery

The goal of this study is to determine whether using pilocarpine provides added benefit to the success of combined cataract + Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, and its treatment consists of lowering intraocular pressure to prevent damage to the optic nerve and loss of vision. Current methods for lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) include topical and oral medications, laser trabeculoplasty, microincisional glaucoma surgery (MIGS), and traditional incisional surgeries such as trabeculectomy and aqueous tube shunts. MIGS have become more popular in recent years as less invasive methods than traditional surgeries that effectively reduce IOP and help reduce the medication burden on patients. There are multiple available MIGS procedures, most of which act by increasing trabecular outflow. One such procedure is the goniotomy via Kahook Dual Blade (KDB), which is usually performed in combination with cataract surgery. KDB is an FDA approved device used to perform a goniotomy via an internal approach. Strips of the nasal angle trabecular meshwork are removed providing a direct pathway for aqueous outflow from the anterior chamber into the collector channels.

Pilocarpine, a parasympathomimetic agent, is a glaucoma medication that works by causing contraction of the ciliary muscle leading to opening of the trabecular meshwork. Due to its frequent dosing requirement and large number of ocular and systemic side effects, pilocarpine has largely fallen out of favor for the treatment of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), except in patients for whom few other alternatives exist. However, pilocarpine is often used after goniotomy surgery. The rationale for its use after goniotomy procedure is for its miotic effect, which theoretically may prevent the formation of peripheral anterior synechiae. Formation of peripheral anterior synechiae can lead to the closure of the cleft that is generated and the possibility of failure of the procedure. While the theoretical benefit of pilocarpine has been proposed, its actual benefit has never been proven. This study will evaluate whether goniotomy via KDB / Cataract surgery without pilocarpine is non-inferior to the same surgery procedure followed by treatment with pilocarpine.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

142

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • New York
      • The Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Recruiting
        • Montefiore Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Wen-Jeng (Melissa) Yao, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Wen-Jeng (Melissa) Yao, MD
      • The Bronx, New York, United States, 10466
        • Recruiting
        • Montefiore Wakefield Campus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with ocular hypertension or open angle glaucoma undergoing combined cataract surgery with KDB in a single surgical center at Montefiore Medical Center with a single provider

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with previous history of eye surgeries (including laser procedures)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pilocarpine, Prednisolone acetate and Ofloxacin
This group will use 2% pilocarpine in the postoperative period, for one month, in addition to standard postoperative drops (Prednisolone acetate and Ofloxacin)
pilocarpine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 2% (20 mg/mL)
Other Names:
  • Isopto®
Prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension 1%
Other Names:
  • Pred Forte
Ofloxacin Drops
Other Names:
  • Ocuflox
  • Floxin
Active Comparator: Prednisolone acetate and Ofloxacin (standard of care)
This group will use only the standard Prednisolone acetate and Ofloxacin, without pilocarpine.
Prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension 1%
Other Names:
  • Pred Forte
Ofloxacin Drops
Other Names:
  • Ocuflox
  • Floxin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients with lowering of intraocular pressure (IOP)
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year following procedure
The percentage of patients who had a reduction in IOP of 20% or more from baseline will be summarized by study arm using descriptive statistics.
From baseline to 1 year following procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients whose regimen was reduced by 1 medication or more
Time Frame: Up to 1 year following procedure
The proportion/percentage of patients whose regimen was reduced by 1 medication or more during each routine post-operative monitoring visit following the combined cataract and KDB surgery procedure will be summarized by study arm using descriptive statistics.
Up to 1 year following procedure
Hypotensive medications
Time Frame: Up to 1 year following procedure
The number and type of ocular hypotensive medications used following the procedure will be summarized by study arm using descriptive statistics.
Up to 1 year following procedure
Rate of progression towards further glaucoma surgery - Humphrey Visual Fields (HVF)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year following procedure
The rate of progression towards additional glaucoma surgeries will be assessed using Humphrey Visual Fields (HVF) testing. Automated HVF testing will be used to detect and monitor the progression of glaucoma by mapping the patient's peripheral vision and detecting areas of vision loss. The rate of progression is assessed through software that assesses both trend and event analysis. Software trend analysis will be used to quantify how much vision is lost up to 1 year. Visual field loss rate will be summarized by study arm and reported using descriptive statistics.
Up to 1 year following procedure
Rate of progression towards further glaucoma surgery - Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year following procedure
The rate of progression towards additional glaucoma surgery will also be assessed using OCT scanning. OCT scanning will be used to obtain a quantitative measurement of structural of the retinal nerve fiber layer over time. OCT can reveal structural changes that often precede functional visual field loss and be an earlier indicator of progression. The rate of structural loss over time as measured by change in retinal nerve fiber thickness will be summarized and reported by study arm and reported using descriptive statistics.
Up to 1 year following procedure
Need for additional glaucoma surgery
Time Frame: Up to 1 year following procedure
The need for additional glaucoma surgery will be determined by the number of patients who require additional glaucoma surgery following the scheduled cataract and KDB surgery. The number/percentage of patients requiring additional glaucoma surgery will be summarized by study arm using descriptive statistics.
Up to 1 year following procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wen-Jeng (Melissa) Yao, MD, Montefiore Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glaucoma

Clinical Trials on Pilocarpine

Subscribe