Non-invasive Home Ventilation in Patients With Severe Hypercapnic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (SOMNOVENT')

Non-invasive Home Ventilation in Patients With Severe Hypercapnic COPD: Standard Versus Löwenstein Mode of Management of Dynamic Hyperinflation; Effects on Hematosis and Sleep.

In COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, the prognosis is poor and the treatment with non invasive ventilation is actually well established. However the best mode of ventilation is not well known.

In severe COPD patients various disorders of respiratory mechanics result in insufficient ventilation, which can be life-threatening or create NIV discomfort. The main characteristic of these disorders is a cyclical closing of small airways that can limit an expiratory flow and provoked some fluctuations in flow curve. To our knowledge, the management of dynamic hyperinflation seems to play an important role in explaining the effect of the NIV. Few studies have examined the effects of the machine's adjustments on dynamic hyperinflation.

The main objective of this study is to analyze the impact of specific ventilatory modes supposed to reduce the dynamic hyperinflation on the hematosis, by studying transcutaneous pressure of carbon dioxide, in severe hypercapnic COPD patients ventilated by NIV. Two modes of ventilation will be compared. First one is an algorithmic mode developed by the company Löwenstein (AirTrap Control, Trigger Lockout and the Expiratory Pressure Ramp). The second one is a standard algorithmic mode, used in the same ventilator. These two ventilatory modes will be evaluated in each patient, during two consecutive nights in current living conditions at home.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Doubs
      • Besançon, Doubs, France, 25000
        • CHRU Jean Minjoz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients followed in the pneumology department of the Besançon university hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of COPD using Gold 2017 criterion
  • Optimal medical treatment of COPD, ie. inhaled steroids, long-acting β2-agonist, long-acting anticholinergic, according to GOLD 2017 guidelines.
  • At least one acute exacerbation of COPD with hypercapnic respiratory failure
  • Introduction of NIV distant to acute exacerbation of COPD with persisting hypercapnia (> 7kPa) on arterial blood gas at rest.
  • NIV equipment from the service provider "Don Du Souffle (DDS)".
  • Patient able to give their consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to NIV (consensus conference of SFAR-SPLF-SRLF)
  • Obstructive sleep apnea with apnea/hypopnea index > to 20/h
  • BMI > 35 kg/m2
  • Low compliance with NIV treatment (<3h per day)
  • Acute exacerbation COPD during inclusion or pH <7.30 in routine blood gas arterial
  • Severe heart failure (New York Heart Association stage IV/IV)
  • Unstable angina
  • Severe arrhythmias
  • Severe renal insufficiency stage > 4
  • Other conditions than COPD resulting in hypercapnia
  • Pregnancy
  • Patient without health insurance
  • Patient excluded by another study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Crossover
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
standard mode
after adjusting pressure and different modes of ventilation to each individual patient. Each one of them will receive NIV using Löwenstein mode during one night at home. Patients will be under transcutaneous PCO2 measurement and polysomnographic surveillance.
NIV using standard mode or Lowenstein mode
Lowenstein mode
after adjusting pressure and different modes of ventilation to each individual patient. Each one of them will receive NIV without Löwenstein mode during one night at home. Patients will be under transcutaneous PCO2 measurement and polysomnographic surveillance.
NIV using standard mode or Lowenstein mode

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean carbon dioxide partial pressure-level during non invasive ventilation
Time Frame: 2 nights
Mean pCO2 level over night calculated using transcutaneous measurement of partial pressure of carbon dioxide under non invasive ventilation. Device : transcutaneous capnography (PtcCO2); SenTec Digital Monitoring System
2 nights

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of respiratory events during non invasive ventilation
Time Frame: 2 nights
According to consensus group, nocturnal respiratory events are : unintentional leak, obstruction at different levels of the upper airways and asynchrony (ineffective effort, auto-triggering, and double triggering, premature or delayed cycling)
2 nights
Sleep quality
Time Frame: 2 nights
Changes in data of polysomnography (total sleep time (TST) ; total recording time ; sleep latency, sleep efficiency (TST/time in bed) ; time in each stages plus percent of TST in each stage ; stage REM latency ; wake time after sleep onset ; arousal index)
2 nights
Ventilation quality
Time Frame: 2 nights
Subjective changes in quality of ventilator by specific auto questionnaire (quality of night, feeling, dyspnea, quality of ventilation, respiratory disturbance caused by NIV, sleep disturbance caused by NIV). The patient answers to each question using a "likert scale" in terms of intensity. The second questionnaire is the S3-NIV which is a tool for the routine clinical assessment of patients undergoing home NIV.
2 nights

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 27, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 27, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 27, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on Non Invasive Ventilation

3
Subscribe