Non Invasive Ventilation on Peripheral Muscle Function and Aerobic Performance (NIV)

June 8, 2022 updated by: Patri-cia Angelica de Miranda Silva Nogueira, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Acute Effects of NIV on Peripheral Muscle Function and Aerobic Performance in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Piloty Study

Background: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) reduces respiratory load and demands on peripheral muscles. Methods: This study aims to evaluate the acute effects of bi-level NIV on peripheral muscle function during isokinetic exercise and aerobic performance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. This is a pilot crossover study performed with a non-probabilistic sample of 14 moderate to very severe COPD patients. Procedures carried out in two days. Dyspnea, quality of life, lung function, respiratory muscle strength, functional capacity (6-minute walk test - 6MWT), and isokinetic assessment of the quadriceps were assessed. Blood samples (lactate, lactate dehydrogenase, and creatine kinase concentration) were also collected. Right after, NIV was performed for 30 minutes (bi-level or placebo, according to randomization) followed by new blood sample collection, 6MWT, and isokinetic dynamometer tests. Before and after evaluations, the subjective perception of dyspnea and fatigue in the lower limbs was quantified. After a wash-out period of seven days, participants returned, and all assessments were performed again.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rio Grande Do Norte
      • Natal, Rio Grande Do Norte, Brazil, 59082-100
        • Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically stable COPD patients (diagnosed according to the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease), of both sexes, without exacerbation or changes in medication for at least one month before the study, and no dyspnea during daily activities (grades 2, 3, and 4 of the Medical Research Council - MRC scale) were included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those with a diagnosis of neoplasia, orthopedic or neurological conditions affecting exercise capacity, peripheral arterial obstructive disease, heart failure, kidney or liver disease, did not adapt, or failed to complete the study procedures, were excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: placebo
The same pressure chosen by the subject during adaptation was used in the placebo intervention; however, a T tube was connected between the equipment and the circuit, creating a leak and leaving the circuit open. The tube characteristics were: 22 x 18 x 22 mm nebulizer T-connector.
Experimental: bi-level
For the NIV intervention, two levels of positive airway pressure (bi-level) were used: the positive inspiratory airway pressure (IPAP) was fixed at 6 cmH2O (centimeters of water), which could be gradually increased up to 14 cmH2O (2 cmH2O every minute), depending on the patient's comfort. and gradually increased to 14 cmH2O (2 cmH2O every minute), While the expiratory airway pressure (EPAP) was set at 3 cmH2O, it could be gradually increased up to 7 cmH2O (1 cmH2O every minute), depending on the patient's comfort.while expiratory airway pressure (EPAP) was fixed at 3 cmH2O and gradually increased to 7 cmH2O (1 cmH2O every minute).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lung function
Time Frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
Lung function was assessed using a spirometer (Koko Digidoser, Longmont, USA), according to the American Thoracic Society/European Throracic Society recommendations14. At least three tests were performed, with a variation of less than 5%, and the highest value obtained was compared with predicted values for the Brazilian population.
change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
Respiratory muscle strength
Time Frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
Respiratory muscle strength was assessed using a digital manometer (MVD 300 - Brazil). Maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures were performed from residual volume and total lung capacity, respectively, and values were compared with previously reference values for the Brazilian population
change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
Functional capacity
Time Frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) was performed in a flat 30-m corridor, according to the ATS recommendations17. Subjects were instructed to keep walking for six minutes, and standardized verbal incentives were given each minute. The perception of dyspnea (using the 10-point Borg scale) were assessed at rest, at the end of the 6MWT, and two minutes after the test. In this test, the walked distance (in meters) was considered for analysis.
change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
COPD Assessement Test
Time Frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
The Portuguese version of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. Subjects were instructed to choose only one option in each item of the questionnaire (cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness, limited activities, confidence leaving home, sleeplessness, and energy). Item scores range from 0 to 5 points resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 40 points. The clinical impact of COPD was assessed according to the following stratification: mild (6-10), moderate (11-20), severe (21-30), and very severe (31-40)20.
change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
Disease severity
Time Frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
COPD severity was assessed using the BODE index (body mass index [B], degree of airway obstruction [O], dyspnea [D], and exercise capacity [E]). For each variable, the following scores were assigned: body mass index (BMI), from 0 to 1 point; degree of airflow obstruction (FEV1% predicted), from 0 to 3 points; dyspnea (MRC scale), from 0 to 3 points; exercise capacity (walked distance in the 6MWT), from 0 to 3 points. The final score of the index ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quadriceps femoris performance
Time Frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
QF (Quadriceps femoris) strength was evaluated with subjects performing 20 repetitions at the same speed. The protocol established was designed to reach a fatigue threshold in the QF muscle. Dyspnea and perceived level of exertion (Borg scale) were also assessed before and after isokinetic evaluation.
change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
Biochemical analyzes
Time Frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes intervention
Before and after procedures, venous blood samples were collected by a blinded experienced pharmacist to analyze lactate, LDH enzyme, and CK (creatine kinase) concentration. Samples were processed, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes at room temperature. The serum concentration was assessed using a specific enzyme kit for each biomarker, following manufacturer's recommendations.
change from baseline and 30 minutes intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Patrícia Nogueira, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 24, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on Non-invasive ventilation bi-level

3
Subscribe