Medication Reconciliation in an Emergency Department: How to Prioritize Patients ?

May 17, 2019 updated by: Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

OPTICONCIL: Implementation of Medication Reconciliation Process in an Emergency Department : Which Patients Should be Prioritized and How to Optimize Patients' Therapeutics?

Medication reconciliation has proven its efficiency in improving patients' care, especially for emergency patients.

This study aimed to identify risk factors of unintended medication discrepancies (UMD) in an emergency department. Secondary objectives were to identify the number and type of UMD, correction rate of UMD and the impact of emergency department organisation on UMD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Emergency patients are at high risk of medication errors, for different reasons: emergency admission, patients who don't know their at-home treatment (polymedicated, cognitive disorders, etc) and who don't have their medical prescriptions available.

Medication reconciliation has proven its efficiency in improving patients' care, especially for emergency patients. However, prioritization is essential to ensure a better efficiency of pharmaceutical resources.

In our center, a pharmacy resident has been assigned to medication reconciliation in the emergency department since November 2017, in collaboration with a clinical pharmacist. Every morning, 3 to 4 patients benefit from medication reconciliation (patients who will be transfered to another unit within our hospital).

The main objective was to identify risk factors of unintended medication discrepancies (UMD) in order to prioritize patients who will benefit from this newly implemented activity.

Secondary objectives were to identify the number and type of UMD, correction rate of UMD and the impact of emergency department organisation on UMD.

All patients who beneficiated from medication reconciliation in the emergency department between November 2017 and April 2018 were included. Were not included patients with a medication reconciliation performed but transfered to another hospital right after the emergency department visit.

This was a retrospective, monocentric, observational study. Number of patients required was 200. Variables collected were:

  • demographics (age, sex, lifestyle, comorbidities),
  • emergency care variables (date and time of medical care beginning, ambulance arrival, adressing type, medical prescriptions availability, main diagnosis, date and hour of medical prescriptions in the emergency department, prescriber (pharmacy/doctor), destination unit of patients)
  • organizational variables (number of daily emergency visits, number of patients hospitalized within the emergency department),
  • medical notes information on at-home treatment (number of missing information, of incorrect information, number of prescriptions in at-home treatment)
  • medication reconciliation variables (date of medication reconciliation, number of sources of information needed, number of actual prescriptions in at-home treatment, number of intended medication discrepancies, number and type of UMD, time needed for medication reconciliation).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ile-de-France
      • Paris, Ile-de-France, France, 75014
        • Groupe hospitalier Paris saint Joseph

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients who beneficiated from medication reconciliation in the emergency department between November 2017 and April 2018

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients who beneficiated from medication reconciliation in the emergency department between November 2017 and April 2018

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients transfered to another hospital right after the emergency department visit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Emergency patients with medication reconciliation
All patients who beneficiated from medication reconciliation in the emergency department between November 2017 and April 2018
No intervention was performed other than collecting data on patients' medical files

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Variables influencing the number of UMD in the emergency department
Time Frame: Nov2017-Apr2018
Variation of the number of UMD for each variable was measured to identify the impact of each factor on medication errors (linear regression). Variables measured were the variables described in the protocol section.
Nov2017-Apr2018

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number and type of UMD
Time Frame: Nov2017-Apr2018
Nov2017-Apr2018
Correction rate of UMD
Time Frame: Nov2017-Apr2018
Nov2017-Apr2018
Impact of organizational variables on the number of UMD
Time Frame: Nov2017-Apr2018
Nov2017-Apr2018

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Corny, PharmD, Pharmacy Department

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OPTICONCIL

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Emergency Service, Hospital

Clinical Trials on Medication reconciliation

Subscribe