Rehabilitation Strategies Following Oesophagogastric and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Cancer (RESTORE II)

April 5, 2022 updated by: Prof Juliette Hussey, University of Dublin, Trinity College

Rehabilitation Strategies Following Oesophagogastric and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Cancer (RESTORE II) - A Randomised Controlled Trial

The RESTORE II randomized controlled trial will examine the efficacy of a 12 week multidisciplinary rehabilitation program consisting of supervised and home-based exercise,1:1 dietetic counselling, and group education sessions for survivors of upper gastrointestinal cancer, namely cancers of the oesophagus, stomach, pancreas, and liver.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Curative treatment for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers is associated with numerous side-effects including sarcopenia and nutritional compromise, increasing morbidity, compromising functional capacity and decreasing health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in survivorship. As survival improves in UGI cancer, there is increasing focus on optimizing survivorship, however research examining rehabilitation programs in this newly-emergent complex clinical cohort is lacking.

The investigators recently designed, implemented, and evaluated the Rehabilitation Strategies following Oesophagogastric Cancer (RESTORE) program, a novel multidisciplinary rehabilitation program tailored for oesophagogastric cancer survivorship. The feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the RESTORE program was established and there is now recognized need to further examine program efficacy in a definitive trial.

Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, RESTORE II, implemented as a 2-armed randomized controlled trial, will examine if multidisciplinary rehabilitation can improve functional capacity and HRQOL in UGI cancer survivors. RESTORE II will prescribe a 12-week program of supervised aerobic and resistance training, self-directed unsupervised exercise, individualized dietetic counselling and multidisciplinary education for patients who are >3 months following oesophagectomy, gastrectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, or major liver resection. A sample of 60 participants per arm will be recruited to establish a mean increase in functional capacity (cardio-respiratory fitness) of 3.5 ml/kg/min with 90% power, 5% significance and 20% drop-out.

Quantitative assessments including cardiopulmonary fitness and functional exercise capacity will be completed at baseline, post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention (Objective 1). HR-QOL will be quantitatively assessed pre and post-intervention, at 3-months post-intervention and 1 year post-enrollment (Objective 2). Impact on physical, mental and social well-being will be qualitatively examined during focus groups immediately post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention (Objective 3). The implementation costs of RESTORE II will be analysed in consideration of clinician salaries, overheads and equipment costs (Objective 4). Bio-samples will be collected pre and post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention, establishing the first National UGI Cancer Survivorship Biobank (Objective 5). A patient centered approach to enhancing trial recruitment in this complex cohort will also be evaluated (Objective 6).

Following this evaluation, the RESTORE II program will provide a unique model of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in nutritionally complex UGI cancer survivors.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Linda O'Neill, PhD
  • Phone Number: +35318964809
  • Email: oneilll8@tcd.ie

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Leinster
      • Dublin, Leinster, Ireland, D08 W9RT
        • Recruiting
        • Trinity College
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients >3-months post oesophagectomy, total gastrectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy or major liver resection +/- neo-adjuvant/adjuvant chemo/chemoradiotherapy with curative intent
  • Completion of adjuvant oncological therapy
  • Successful completion of baseline cardiopulmonary exercise test
  • Medical clearance to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ongoing serious post-operative morbidity
  • Evidence of active or recurrent disease
  • Co-morbidities that would preclude safe exercise participation;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group
12 week multidisciplinary program consisting of; i) supervised and home-based aerobic and resistance training, ii) 1:1 dietary counselling, and iii) group education sessions.
Detailed in arm description
No Intervention: Control
Usual care control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Cardiorespiratory Fitness from Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Cardiorespiratory fitness will be determined by Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET)
Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical Performance
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Physical Performance will be measured with the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Lower Limb Muscle Strength
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Lower limb muscle strength (llbs)will be measured by a leg press 1-RM
Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Hand Grip Strength
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Hand grip strength (kg) will be measured with hand held dynamometry
Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Physical Activity
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Physical Activity levels will be measured by accelerometry (ACTIGRAPH GT3X+)
Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Body Mass Index
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Body mass index will be measured as the ratio of weight (kg) to height in metres squared.
Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Waist Circumference
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Waist circumference (cm) will be measured at the mid-point between the iliac crest and the 12th rib following gentle expiration.
Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Mid Arm Circumference
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Mid Arm circumference (cm) will be measured at the mid-point between the olecranon process of the ulna and the acromion process of the scapula.
Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Fat Mass
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Fat mass(kg) will be measured with the Seca mBCA 515.
Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Fat Free Mass
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Fat free mass (kg) will be measured with the Seca mBCA 515.
Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Skeletal Muscle Mass
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Skeletal muscle mass(kg) will be measured with the Seca mBCA 515.
Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Dietary Quality
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Dietary quality will be scored using the WCRF/AICR index which determines adherence to healthy eating guidelines for cancer survivors.
Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Health Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), Three month Follow-up (T2), One-year post intervention (T3)

Quality of Life will be determined by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30).

Scores are reported on a linear scale from 0-100. A high score in a functional scale indicates greater function. A high score in a symptom scale indicates greater symptom burden.

Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), Three month Follow-up (T2), One-year post intervention (T3)
Health Related Quality of Life (Specific to Oesophago-gastric cancer)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), Three month Follow-up (T2), One-year post intervention (T3)

For Oesophago-gastric Cancer Patients Quality of Life will be further assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Oesophago-gastric Cancer Subscale the QLQ-OG25.

Scores are reported on a linear scale from 0-100. A high score in a functional scale indicates greater function. A high score in a symptom scale indicates greater symptom burden.

Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), Three month Follow-up (T2), One-year post intervention (T3)
Health Related Quality of Life (Specific to Hepatocellular carcinoma)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), Three month Follow-up (T2), One-year post intervention (T3)
For Liver Cancer Patients Quality of Life will be further assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Hepatocellular carcinoma subscale (QLQ-HCC18) Scores are reported on a linear scale from 0-100. A high score in a functional scale indicates greater function. A high score in a symptom scale indicates greater symptom burden.
Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), Three month Follow-up (T2), One-year post intervention (T3)
Health Related Quality of Life (Specific to Pancreatic carcinoma)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), Three month Follow-up (T2), One-year post intervention (T3)

For Pancreatic Cancer Patients Quality of Life will be further assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Pancreatic cancer Subscale (QLQ-PAN26).

Scores are reported on a linear scale from 0-100. A high score on a functional scale indicates greater function. A high score on a symptom scale indicates greater symptom burden.

Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), Three month Follow-up (T2), One-year post intervention (T3)
Fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Fatigue will be assessed using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) questionnaire. It is scored from 0-20. A cut off score of >or =13 indicates severe fatigue.
Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Qualitative Approach
Time Frame: Immediately after the program intervention and Three-months post intervention
Focus groups and interviews will be carried out with participants from the intervention arm to gain their perspectives of the impact of the program on physical and mental well-being.
Immediately after the program intervention and Three-months post intervention
Cost Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post program completion
The costs of the program will be set against the effects on HRQOL
Up to 1 year post program completion
Bio-sample Collection
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)
Serum and Plasma samples will be collected at each time-point to establish a survivorship Biobank for UGI cancer.
Baseline (T0), Immediately after the program intervention (T1), and Three month Follow-up (T2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Juliette Hussey, PhD, Professor in Physiotherapy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 25, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HRB-DIFA RESTORE II Trial

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trials on RESTORE II Program

3
Subscribe