- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03963570
The Effectiveness of a Self-managed Digital Exercise Programme to Prevent Falls in Older Community-dwelling People (SafeStepRCT)
The Effectiveness of a Self-managed Digital Exercise Programme to Prevent Falls in Older Community-dwelling People -The Safe Step Randomized Controlled Trial
The overall aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a digital self-management exercise program in preventing falls in community dwelling older people.
Participants will be recruited in Sweden through the website (www.sakrasteg.se) providing study information. On the website interested seniors will get information about the aim and procedures of the study as well as inclusion and exclusion criteria. If seniors themselves judge that they are eligible to participate in the study they can register by providing their email address. After baseline assessment, through self-reports in a digital survey, participants will be randomized to either an exercise intervention or a control group in a 1:1 ratio. The investigators aim to include 1400 participants and recruitment will be ongoing continuously for one year.
The exercise intervention is delivered through the Safe Step application, developed in co-creation with seniors and an interdisciplinary research team. Safe Step provides a large repository of evidence based exercises in video formats alongside falls preventive information and advice. With support of this application the user can compose an individualized exercise program with balance and strength exercises suitable for their needs. To help the user adhere to the program a set of behaviour change techniques is provided by the program. The user can set their own goals, get reminders and positive feedback form a virtual physiotherapist, and follow their own progress. Advice on how to integrate the exercises into everyday activities is also offered. The participants will exercise on their own with the help of the application during one year, with a recommendation of 30 minutes at least 3 times/week.
In addition to the exercise intervention the participants will every month get an email with falls preventive information in short videos, they will also be asked to report any falls by responding to a survey attached to the message. The exercise group will be compared to a control group that will receive the same information emails as the exercise group, but no individual exercise advice.
The interventions will last for 1 year with follow up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 month in addition the monthly fall reports. Due to the nature of the study, with no face to face contact, all outcome measures are self-reports and self-tests in digital surveys. The primary outcome is fall rate. The study follows the CONSORT guidelines and CONSORT EHEALTH criteria.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Umeå, Sweden, 90187
- Caring Science Buildning, Umeå University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 70 years or older
- Have fallen or experienced a decline in perceived postural balance during the last year
- Have access to a smartphone or a tablet and uses it regularly
- Have an own email address and uses it
- Ability to understand verbal and written instructions in Swedish
- Can rise from a standard height chair without a person helping
- Independently mobile without a walking aid indoors
Exclusion Criteria:
- Progressive disease where there is likely to be a decline in strength or balance over the next year
- Perceived memory dysfunction that affect everyday life activities
- Taking part in more than 3 hours each week of strenuous physical exercise which makes them out of breath (e.g. dance, gymnastics, gym exercises, running or skiing)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Safe Step - digital exercise program
Participants randomized to the experimental group will receive full access to the Safe Step application and create their own individual program of strength and balance exercises.
During 1 year the participants are recommended to exercise at least 30 minutes, 3 times a week and continuously progress their program.
In addition they will every month receive an email with general falls prevention information in a short video.
|
After receiving the Safe Step application the participants view an instruction movie on how to use the application to create and progress their own individual exercise program. The exercises, presented in video format, are organized into 10 predetermined groups with a main focus to improve balance (3 groups), increase lower-limb strength (4 groups), and improve gait/step (3 groups). The participants choose an exercise suitable for their needs from each group to compose a program of ten exercises. They can use the app to plan their exercises, set reminders, register their exercise, and view statistics of their progress. A virtual physiotherapist deliver motivational messages and feed-back. At the end of every month, of the 1 year intervention period, the participants will receive an email asking them to report any falls during the past month by answering a short digital survey. This message will provide a new video each month with general falls prevention information besides exercise. |
|
Other: Control group
During 1 year, the participants randomized to the control group will receive an email every month with general falls prevention information in a short video.
|
Participants randomized to the control condition will only be given information.
They will receive exactly the same email messages as the intervention group with falls prevention information and a request to report any falls.
At the end of the 12 month intervention we will, in addition to the other questions, ask if they have started to do any exercises during the intervention period.
After the 12 month follow-up assessment the control group will be offered the Safe Step application.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fall rate
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Falls will be registered every month through a short digital survey, received by email, asking the participant if they had any falls during the last month.
If answering yes a few additional questions about when the fall occurred, any resulting injuries and hospital visits will be asked.
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Perceived Exertion
Time Frame: Change; Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
The Borg Scale of Perceived Exertion during the 30 second chair stand test, rated on a scale between 6 (none) to 20 (maximal exertion).
|
Change; Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
|
Self-rated balance
Time Frame: Change; Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
Answering the question: "How do you perceive you balance?" on a 5-level ordinal scale ranging from "very good" to "very bad".
|
Change; Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
|
Self-rated leg-strength
Time Frame: Change; Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
Answering the question: "How do you perceive your leg muscle strength?"
on a 5-level ordinal scale ranging from "very good" to "very bad".
|
Change; Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
|
Falls efficacy
Time Frame: Change; Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I).
Concerns about falling is rated for 16 activities (e.g.
cleaning the house) on a scale from 1 (not at all concerned ) to 4 (very concerned ).
Ratings for each of the 16 activities are summed to a total score ranging from 16 (no concern about falling) to maximum 64 (severe concern about falling)
|
Change; Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
|
Use of the information videos
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
Answering the question: "Have you watched the videos we sent you by e-mail during the last 3 months?"
on a 4-level ordinal scale.
|
3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
|
Experienced positive effects of the exercise intervention
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
Exercise intervention: Self-report of any positive effects of the exercise intervention besides effects on balance and strength.
On a nominal scale including an optional text field.
|
3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
|
Experienced negative effects of the exercise intervention
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
Exercise intervention: Self-report of any negative effects (adverse events) of the exercise intervention besides effects on balance and strength.
On a nominal scale including an optional text field.
|
3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
|
Physical activity
Time Frame: Change: Baseline, 12 months
|
Self-reported minutes/week, pre-defined alternatives in 30 minutes blocks up to more than 2 hours.
|
Change: Baseline, 12 months
|
|
Self-rated improvements in balance
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Answering the question: "If you compare with when you started this study a year ago, how would you assess balance today?" on a 5-level ordinal scale on a 5-level ordinal scale ranging from "much better" to "much worse".
|
12 months
|
|
Self-rated improvements in leg-strength
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Answering the questions: "If you compare with when you started this study a year ago, how would you assess the muscle strength in your legs today?" on a 5-level ordinal scale ranging from "much better" to "much worse".
|
12 months
|
|
Rate of attrition
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Drop-outs and with-draws in the study
|
12 months
|
|
New exercise routines
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Participants will be asked if they have started to do any exercises (besides the study intervention) during the intervention period.
|
12 months
|
|
Costs related to the interventions
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Participants will be asked to report if they have had any cost related to the intervention during the intervention period e.g. for internet access or equipment.
|
12 months
|
|
Number of fallers
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Falls will be registered every month through a short digital survey, received by email, asking the participant if they had any falls during the last month.
If answering yes a few additional questions about when the fall occurred, any resulting injuries and hospital visits will be asked.
|
12 months
|
|
Functional leg strength
Time Frame: Change; Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
Self-administered chair stand test (i.e.
number of stands during 30 seconds).
|
Change; Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
|
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: Change; Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
Health related quality of life is assessed by the EuroQol 5 dimension 5 level self-report questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, and a Visual Analogue scale (VAS). Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. A 1-digit number express the level selected for each dimension. The digits for 5 dimensions can be combined in a 5-digit number describing the respondent's health state. It should be noted that the numerals 1-5 have no arithmetic properties. The VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale (ranging from 0-100) with endpoints labelled "the best health you can imagine" and "the worst health you can imagine". . |
Change; Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
|
Exercise adherence throughout the intervention
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Exercise intervention: Adherence to predefined minutes of 3x30 min/week reported continuously through an integrated exercise diary in the Safe step application and by self-report at follow up assessments.
|
12 months
|
|
Sociodemographic characteristics
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Reach of recruitment will be assessed based on self-reported sociodemographic characteristics of participants included.
|
Baseline
|
|
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Cost-effectiveness of the interventions with respect to falls
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marlene Sandlund, Assist. Prof, Umeå University
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- SafeStepRCT
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Accidental Falls
-
The Hospital District of SatakuntaCompleted
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceRecruitingAccidental FallsFrance
-
Shirley HuangJintronixRecruiting
-
Sigma Theta Tau InternationalRecruiting
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreVA Maryland Health Care SystemCompletedAccidental FallsUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineUS Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCompleted
-
Universidad Miguel Hernandez de ElcheSocio- Health Center Puente Real ( Health Care for Older © ) of BadajozCompleted
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityCompletedAccidental FallsHong Kong
-
Montana State UniversityCompletedAccidental FallsUnited States
-
University of PittsburghBoston University; Foundation for Physical Therapy, Inc.; Mt. Ascutney Hospital...CompletedAccidental FallsUnited States
Clinical Trials on Safe Step - digital exercise program
-
World BankRecruitingAdolescent Behavior | Sexual and Reproductive Health | Life Skills | Digital Skills | Earning OutcomesNigeria
-
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute...RecruitingFrailty | Fall Injury | Old Age; Atrophy | Age-Related Atrophy | Age-Related SarcopeniaCanada
-
Umeå UniversityThe Swedish Research Council; Forte; Glasgow Caledonian UniversityCompleted
-
Pamukkale UniversityCompletedMultiple SclerosisTurkey
-
The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University...Beijing Children's Hospital; Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingCongenital Heart Disease in Children | Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)China
-
University of VermontCompleted
-
Umeå UniversityCompleted
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompleted
-
University of California, San DiegoNot yet recruitingSexual Violence | Safety | Alcohol | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)
-
University of California, BerkeleyFundacion Cantaro AzulCompleted