Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy Between of Interscalene Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone

April 10, 2024 updated by: Meg Rosenblatt, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of a Single Shot Interscalene Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine to Bupivacaine With Dexamethasone as an adjuvant-a Randomized Controlled Trial

Pain management after shoulder surgeries poses a unique challenge to the surgeon as well as the anesthesiologist. Regional anesthesia in the form of interscalene approach to the brachial plexus as an adjunct to general anesthesia or as a sole primary technique comes to one's rescue. Interscalene block either as single shot or as a catheter is an established modality for effective analgesia which facilitates early mobilization helping in physical therapy and early discharge.

With the help of local anesthetic injected as a single shot, analgesia usually lasts less than 24 hours. Recent research in regional anesthesia is advancing towards adjuvants which will prolong the duration of local anesthesia. This has introduced the concept of "multimodal perineural analgesia (MMPNA)" whereby multiple agents with differing mechanisms of action are used with the goal of providing perineural analgesia while avoiding exposure to high and potentially toxic levels of individual agents. Some of the commonly used adjuvants in clinical studies are fentanyl, buprenorphine, morphine, tramadol, magnesium, epinephrine, ketamine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), midazolam, parecoxib, ketorolac, clonidine, dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, neostigmine and potassium. They find a distinct place in wide spread clinical practice as an off-label use.

Steroids have a long history of safe use in epidural space for treatment of radicular pain due to nerve irritation. Dexamethasone is used routinely as a part of anti- emetic prophylaxis and anti-inflammatory effect. Methyl prednisone was the first steroid to be used as an adjuvant. Dexamethasone was first used as an adjuvant in 2003.

It has been hypothesized that steroids induce a degree of vasoconstriction, thereby reducing local anesthetic absorption, tend to have an opioid sparing effect. Another theory suggests that it increases the activity of inhibitory potassium channels on nociceptive C-fibers (via glucocorticoid receptors), thus decreasing their activity.

Several studies have demonstrated promising results with the use of 8mg of perineural dexamethasone. No neuronal injury has been reported in in vivo studies. Though there are several studies which report usage of dexamethasone in varying doses of 2mg to 8mg, the optimal effective dose of dexamethasone as an adjuvant for nerve block remains unknown. Some studies have suggested perineural is more effective than IV as an adjuvant .

Liposomal bupivacaine, a formulation where bupivacaine is encapsulated into multivesicular liposomes, making it a slow and controlled release from the liposomes, was originally indicated for wound infiltration at the surgical site to provide post-surgical analgesia. Studies have demonstrated efficacy up to 24 hours in femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty. Recent approval of liposomal bupivacaine in interscalene block for shoulder surgeries by FDA opens an arena unexplored in the world of regional anesthesia.

Current opioid epidemic, a crisis in health care forces healthcare providers to consider alternate analgesic modalities without compromising patient comfort. Regional anesthesia has revolutionized peri-operative pain management by avoiding opioids and their side effects. Use of adjuvants to the current regional techniques holds promise in postsurgical analgesia.

The researchers propose to compare the analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine to bupivacaine with dexamethasone as an adjuvant in interscalene block with catheters for shoulder surgeries. Till date, there is not a single study comparing the three in current literature.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There have been several studies demonstrating efficacy of dexamethasone in prolonging the analgesic effect when administered both perineurally and intra-venously as an adjuvant to local anesthesia demonstrating a dose effect relationship. Liposomal bupivacaine has shown promising results in total knee arthroplasty and there are a limited number of studies demonstrating efficacy in total shoulder arthroplasty.

If by comparing dexamethasone as an adjuvant to bupivacaine and liposomal formulation is deciphered, it can help in avoiding costs associated with liposomal bupivacaine extending post-operative analgesia avoiding narcotics and reducing health care costs. And comparing the two to the standard catheters helps us understand if they have a role in pain management in the future.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients between age 18-80 years undergoing elective primary total shoulder arthroplasty procedure.
  • All patients who speak read and understand English will be included for follow up purposes.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • ASA 5
  • presence of coagulopathy
  • severe lung disease
  • contralateral diaphragmatic palsy
  • insulin-dependent diabetes
  • hepatic disease/failure
  • kidney disease/failure
  • pregnancy
  • chronic opioid use (defined as opioid use for >3 months), or allergy to any of the study medications.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Interscalene catheter
Interscalene catheter 0.5 % bupivacaine 15cc with rescue catheters attached to a PCA pump with bupivacaine infusion at 6cc /hour.
0.5% bupivacaine
rescue catheters attached to a PCA pump
Experimental: Interscalene single shot with liposomal bupivacaine
Liposomal bupivacaine 10cc of exparel with 0.5% bupivacaine 5cc, total 15cc with rescue catheter attached to a PCA pump with normal saline at 6cc/hour infusion.
10 cc
Other Names:
  • Exparel
Experimental: Interscalene with bupivacaine and dexamethasone
Interscalene single shot with bupivacaine and dexamethasone as adjuvant 0.5% bupivacaine 14cc with 1 cc of 4mg dexamethasone, total 15cc with rescue catheter attached to a PCA pump with normal saline at 6cc/hour infusion.
0.5% bupivacaine
1 cc of 4mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical Rating Score for Pain
Time Frame: at 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours
Numerical rating score for pain is assessed from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain.
at 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to First Analgesic Request
Time Frame: Day 1
Time to first analgesic request on Day 1
Day 1
Total Narcotic Consumption
Time Frame: hospital stay, up to 48 hours
Total narcotic consumption in mg morphine equivalents (MME) during hospital stay
hospital stay, up to 48 hours
Arm Weakness
Time Frame: at 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours
Arm weakness as assessed by flexion and extension at wrist -- total scale from 1 to 10, with 10 being most weakness
at 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours
Arm Numbness
Time Frame: at 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours
Arm numbness assessed by the sensation at deltoid area. Sensation total scale from 1 to 10, with higher number indicating most sensation.
at 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours
Time of Analgesia Duration
Time Frame: Day 1
The duration for which the patient has no pain on Day 1
Day 1
Time of Motor Recovery
Time Frame: Day 1
Time of motor recovery on Day 1
Day 1
Sensory Intact
Time Frame: at 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours
Sensory testing by using pinprick in the region of C5 dermatome. Scale from 1 to 10, with higher score indicating more sensation.
at 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours
Hand Strength
Time Frame: at 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours
Hand strength assessed by using dynamometer, a device for measuring the amount of static force that can squeeze around a dynamometer, in kilograms.
at 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours
PACU Length of Stay
Time Frame: Day 1
Post-anesthesia Care Unit length of stay in hours on Day 1
Day 1
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: up to 3 days
Length of stay for duration of hospital admission
up to 3 days
Number of Complication Events
Time Frame: up to 3 days
Number of complications - any associated complications like nausea, vomiting, dizziness, horner's syndrome, hoarseness and dyspnea
up to 3 days
Number of Participants With Quality of Sleep Rating
Time Frame: average of 3 days
Patient to rate their quality of sleep as good, average, or bad
average of 3 days
Number of Participants With Patient's Satisfaction
Time Frame: during the hospital stay, up to 3 days
Number of Participants with Patient satisfaction. Patients were asked if they were satisfied.
during the hospital stay, up to 3 days
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
Time Frame: baseline and one week post-op
PROMIS global assessment assesses physical and mental activities of daily living scored from 0 (poor) to 5 (excellent) at first post-operative visit as compared to baseline. Each scale from 0-100, higher score indicates better health outcomes.
baseline and one week post-op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 18, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shoulder Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine

Subscribe