EMPOWER Study, a Personalized Home Care Intervention for Older Heart Failure Patients

April 17, 2021 updated by: Jinjiao Wang, University of Rochester

Examining the Feasibility of EMPOWER - A Personalized Adherence Enhancement Intervention for Older Post-discharge Heart Failure Patients

The purpose of this study is to see how investigators may best improve treatment adherence and disease management for heart failure after hospital discharge. This is because the period after hospital discharge is critical to long-term recovery, overall quality of life, and prevention of future hospitalizations. In this study, a trained nurse interventionist will work with the participants to develop a personalized adherence enhancement strategy for heart failure diagnosis. The personalized adherence enhancement strategy is called EMPOWER.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14580
        • UR Medicine Home Care

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of moderate/severe heart failure at hospital admission, defined by ICD codes (ICD-9 428 or ICD-10 150), New York Heart Association class III/IV, and left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 40% (i.e., echocardiography)
  • discharge from heart failure-led hospitalization to home health care in approximately the previous week
  • intact or mildly impaired cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment eligibility scores greater than or equal to 18)
  • primary residence in four counties within 30 minutes distance to the University of Rochester

Exclusion Criteria:

  • end-of-life prognosis in the following 6 months that make it difficult to examine the changes in heart failure outcomes
  • currently receiving hospice care
  • conditions that impact the receipt of the intervention such as active suicidal ideation that is identified at baseline using the Geriatric Depression Scale and the Geriatric Suicide Ideation Scale
  • being non-English speaking
  • having serious visual and or hearing impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Behavorial intervention
EMPOWER includes 4 weekly home visit and 4 follow up booster phone calls every other week for the following 8 weeks. The trained nurse interventionist will address identified adherence barriers related to knowledge deficits about heart failure and its treatment including psycho-social barriers and logistic barriers with their primary care physician if necessary.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change in medication adherence
Time Frame: week 1 to week 4
Adherence will be calculated either by manual pill counting or by the Medication Event Monitoring System, a microelectronic monitoring device on the cap of medication containers.
week 1 to week 4
Mean change in medication adherence
Time Frame: week 1 to 3 months
Adherence will be calculated either by manual pill counting or by the Medication Event Monitoring System, a microelectronic monitoring device on the cap of medication containers.
week 1 to 3 months
mean change in adherence to low-sodium diet
Time Frame: week 1 to week 4

Adherence to low sodium diet will be assessed by the Dietary Sodium Restriction Questionnaire (DSRQ). The DSRQ is composed of 3 subscales: 1) attitude toward the behavior, 2) subjective norm, and 3) perceived behavioral control.

Attitude. There are 6 items in the Attitude subscale. The scores on this subscale ranged from 6 to 30, where a higher score indicates correct attitudes (better knowledge) about following a low-sodium diet.

Subjective norm. There are 3 items in the Subjective Norm subscale. The scores on this subscale ranged from 3 to 15, where a higher score indicates heavier influence of subjective norm of social contacts on one's adherence to low-sodium diet.

Perceived behavioral control. There are 7 items in the Perceived Behavioral Control subscale. The scores on this subscale ranged from 7 to 35, a higher score indicates a higher likelihood for each item to be a barrier in adherence to low-sodium diet.

week 1 to week 4
mean change in adherence to low-sodium diet
Time Frame: week 1 to 3 months

Adherence to low sodium diet will be assessed by the Dietary Sodium Restriction Questionnaire (DSRQ). The DSRQ is composed of 3 subscales: 1) attitude toward the behavior, 2) subjective norm, and 3) perceived behavioral control.

Attitude. There are 6 items in the Attitude subscale. The scores on this subscale ranged from 6 to 30, where a higher score indicates correct attitudes (better knowledge) about following a low-sodium diet.

Subjective norm. There are 3 items in the Subjective Norm subscale. The scores on this subscale ranged from 3 to 15, where a higher score indicates heavier influence of subjective norm of social contacts on one's adherence to low-sodium diet.

Perceived behavioral control. There are 7 items in the Perceived Behavioral Control subscale. The scores on this subscale ranged from 7 to 35, a higher score indicates a higher likelihood for each item to be a barrier in adherence to low-sodium diet.

week 1 to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jinjiao Wang, PhD, RN, University of Rochester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RSRB00003400

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on EMPOWER

3
Subscribe