CT Air-trapping for the Early Identification of Benralizumab Responders Among Eosinophilic Asthma Patients (BenraliScan)

July 17, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Computed Tomography Air-trapping Characterisation for the Early Identification of Benralizumab Responders Among Eosinophilic Asthma Patients

BenraliScan aims to obtain thoracic computed tomography imaging data to predict the future level of patient response to a monoclonal antibody. Because the clinical responses under study can take many months to manifest, early identification of patients most-likely to benefit from treatment and treatment rule-out for others will save considerable time for everybody involved.

The primary objective of BenraliScan is to determine the prognostic value (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) of air-trapping measures (Expiratory/Inspiratory ratios for Mean Lung Density (MLDe/i)) detected via quantitative thoracic computed tomography at baseline for improvement in exacerbation rate (the presence of a ≥50% reduction in baseline exacerbation rate versus the absence of a ≥50% reduction in baseline exacerbation rate) at 52 weeks among eosinophilic asthma patients treated with Benralizumab.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Secondary, exploratory objectives include:

  • To describe clinical improvement category sub-groups (e.g. non-responders versus strong responders) in terms of: target concomitant medication usage, symptomology, quality of life (questionnaires), exacerbation rates (and other adverse events) and lung function parameters, differential blood counts, serum club cell secretory protein (CCSP) levels, other quantitative thoracic computed tomography (QTCT) variables, sinus mucosal thickness.
  • To perform exploratory, prognostic-value studies (including but not limited to prognostic variables derived from changes occurring over 24 weeks and from clustering or factor mining at baseline and 24 weeks). These exploratory studies will include (but are not necessarily limited to) estimating the sensitivity/specificity of baseline/early imaging variables (or combination thereof) for predicting clinical response variables.
  • To describe the prognostic categories (e.g. predicted non-responder versus predicted responder) found in terms of: clinical improvement, target concomitant medication usage, symptomology, quality of life (questionnaires), exacerbation rates (and other adverse events) and lung function parameters, differential blood counts, serum CCSP levels, other QTCT variables, sinus mucosal thickness.
  • To create a centralised image library associated with the study.
  • To verify the reproducibility of the relationships found between mean lung density (upper and lower lung, inspiratory and expiratory), the fractal dimension of -850 HU segmentations, and clinical variables found during the SCANN'AIR study (NCT03102749).
  • To explore the association between bronchial homothety curves (the homothety of two consecutive bronchial measurements as a function of bronchial generation) and disease severity/progression.
  • To monitor patient safety throughout the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

59

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France, 13915
        • Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Marseille
      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • University Hospitals of Montpellier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 73 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Understanding and acceptance of the protocol
  • The patient has given his/her informed consent and signed the consent form
  • Affiliation with or beneficiary of the French national health insurance system
  • Female and male patients aged 18 to 75 years (inclusively) with a history of physician-diagnosed severe asthma (according to GINA criteria) requiring treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus long-acting beta-agonists for at least 12 months prior to inclusion
  • Documented current treatment with high daily doses of ICS (>1000 µg equivalent beclomethasone) plus at least one other asthma controller for at least 6 months prior to inclusion
  • History of at least 2 asthma exacerbations while on ICS plus another asthma controller that required treatment with systemic corticosteroids (any administration route) in the 12 months prior to inclusion. For patients receiving corticosteroids as a maintenance therapy, the corticosteroid treatment for the exacerbation is defined as a temporary increase in their maintenance dose.
  • Uncontrolled disease (Asthma Control Questionnaire >1.5)
  • Pre bronchodilator forced expiratory volume at 1 second (% predicted) between 40% and 85%, established according to the NHANESIII criteria
  • Blood eosinophilia ≥ 300 cells / µl at least once during the previous 12 months -OR- blood eosinophilia ≥ 300 cells / µl upon inclusion
  • Women of childbearing potential must use at least one acceptable and effective form of birth control
  • Weight ≥ 40 kg

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other respiratory diseases or associated lung infections
  • Patient treated with a monoclonal antibody in the 5 months preceding inclusion
  • Patient who participated in a therapeutic study in the month prior to inclusion
  • Patient deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • Major (adult) protected by the law (under any kind of guardianship)
  • Patient in an exclusion period determined by another protocol
  • Patient who participated in another research protocol with X-ray exposure in the past 12 months
  • Patient who has already participated in the present protocol
  • Hypersensitivity to benralizumab or to any of the excipients: histidine, histidine hydrochloride monohydrate, trehalose dehydrate, polysorbate 20 and water for injections
  • Exacerbation, antibiotics, or non-maintenance systemic steroids during the 6 weeks prior to inclusion
  • Subjects with untreated helminthic parasitic infection
  • Lactating or pregnant* females or females who intend to become pregnant
  • Subjects with a history of anaphylaxis to any biologic therapy
  • Subjects taking immunosuppressive medications (except oral prednisone and inhaled and topical corticosteroids)
  • Subjects with intercurrent illnesses (eg, viral illnesses) that may compromise the safety of the subject
  • Subjects who are febrile (≥ 38°C)
  • Currently smoking or smoking history ≥ 20 pack years
  • Subjects who have had basal cell carcinoma, localized squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or in situ carcinoma of the cervix are eligible provided that the subject is in remission and curative therapy was completed at least 12 months prior to the date of informed consent, and assent when applicable was obtained
  • Subjects who have had other malignancies are eligible provided that the subject is in remission and curative therapy was completed at least 5 years prior to the date of informed consent, and assent when applicable, was obtained

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: The study population
The study population corresponds to severe eosinophilic asthma patients (see eligibility criteria).
Benralizumab is administered for 48 weeks (week 0 to week 48) every 4 weeks for the first 3 injections (30 mg sc per injection), and then every 8 weeks for the following 5 injections.
Computed tomography of the thorax is performed at the beginning (week 0), middle (week 24) and towards the end (week 48) of Benralizumab therapy. A sinus scan is also added on weeks 0 and 48.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The prognositc value (sensitivity) of baseline expiratory to inspiratory mean lung density (MLDe/i) for predicting improvement in exacerbation rate
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The sensitivity and specificity of the baseline expiratory to inspiratory mean lung density (MLDe/i) for predicting improvement in exacerbation rate (the presence of a ≥50% reduction in baseline exacerbation rate versus the absence of a ≥50% reduction in baseline exacerbation rate) at week 52.
52 weeks
The prognositc value (specificity) of baseline expiratory to inspiratory mean lung density (MLDe/i) for predicting improvement in exacerbation rate
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The sensitivity and specificity of the baseline expiratory to inspiratory mean lung density (MLDe/i) for predicting improvement in exacerbation rate (the presence of a ≥50% reduction in baseline exacerbation rate versus the absence of a ≥50% reduction in baseline exacerbation rate) at week 52.
52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
52E: the number of exacerbations occurring during follow-up
Time Frame: 52 weeks
An exacerbation is defined as follows: worsening of symptoms (increased shortness of breath, cough, sputum, with or without fever) which necessitates unscheduled healthcare resource use, a need for >48h of oral corticosteroids. For oral steroids, a minimal dose of 0.25 mg/kg is required. For patients taking oral steroids on a long term basis, at least a doubling dose for 2 days is required.
52 weeks
52cFEV1 pre BD: The change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) pre BD from baseline
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
52cACQ: The change from baseline in the ACQ score
Time Frame: 52 weeks
'ACQ' refers to the Asthma Control Questionnaire: The ACQ-6 is a shortened version of the ACQ that assesses asthma symptoms (night-time waking, symptoms on waking, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheezing, and SABA use) omitting the FEV1 measurement from the original ACQ score. Patients are asked to recall how their asthma has been during the previous week by responding to one bronchodilator use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions are weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). The mean ACQ-6 score is the mean of the responses. Mean scores of ≤0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.75 and <1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score ≥1.5 indicates not well controlled asthma. Individual changes of at least 0.5 are considered to be clinically meaningful.
52 weeks
52CI: A clinical improvement score
Time Frame: 52 weeks

52CI: A clinical improvement score starting at zero and where points are added based on the following criteria:

  • 52E = 0 or 1 non-admitting† exacerbation (+1 point);
  • 52cFEV1 pre BD > 300 ml in asthma patients (+1 point);
  • 52cACQ > 0.5 (+1 point).
52 weeks
Concomitant medication use
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
The Asthma Control Questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 0
'ACQ' refers to the Asthma Control Questionnaire: The ACQ-6 is a shortened version of the ACQ that assesses asthma symptoms (night-time waking, symptoms on waking, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheezing, and SABA use) omitting the FEV1 measurement from the original ACQ score. Patients are asked to recall how their asthma has been during the previous week by responding to one bronchodilator use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions are weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). The mean ACQ-6 score is the mean of the responses. Mean scores of ≤0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.75 and <1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score ≥1.5 indicates not well controlled asthma. Individual changes of at least 0.5 are considered to be clinically meaningful.
Week 0
The Asthma Control Questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 24
'ACQ' refers to the Asthma Control Questionnaire: The ACQ-6 is a shortened version of the ACQ that assesses asthma symptoms (night-time waking, symptoms on waking, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheezing, and SABA use) omitting the FEV1 measurement from the original ACQ score. Patients are asked to recall how their asthma has been during the previous week by responding to one bronchodilator use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions are weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). The mean ACQ-6 score is the mean of the responses. Mean scores of ≤0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.75 and <1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score ≥1.5 indicates not well controlled asthma. Individual changes of at least 0.5 are considered to be clinically meaningful.
Week 24
The Asthma Control Questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 52
'ACQ' refers to the Asthma Control Questionnaire: The ACQ-6 is a shortened version of the ACQ that assesses asthma symptoms (night-time waking, symptoms on waking, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheezing, and SABA use) omitting the FEV1 measurement from the original ACQ score. Patients are asked to recall how their asthma has been during the previous week by responding to one bronchodilator use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions are weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). The mean ACQ-6 score is the mean of the responses. Mean scores of ≤0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.75 and <1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score ≥1.5 indicates not well controlled asthma. Individual changes of at least 0.5 are considered to be clinically meaningful.
Week 52
The SNOT22 Questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 0
The 22-question SNOT-22 is scored as 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be) with a total range from 0 to 110 (higher scores indicate poorer outcomes).
Week 0
The SNOT22 Questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 24
The 22-question SNOT-22 is scored as 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be) with a total range from 0 to 110 (higher scores indicate poorer outcomes).
Week 24
The SNOT22 Questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 52
The 22-question SNOT-22 is scored as 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be) with a total range from 0 to 110 (higher scores indicate poorer outcomes).
Week 52
The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)
Time Frame: Week 0
The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) is a 32-item, 4-domain questionnaire with a 2-week recall period. Each item is scored using a 7-point likert scale where scores range from 1 to 7 and higher scores indicate higher quality of life. Simple means are used to calculate the overall AQLQ score (as well as domain scores).
Week 0
The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)
Time Frame: Week 24
The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) is a 32-item, 4-domain questionnaire with a 2-week recall period. Each item is scored using a 7-point likert scale where scores range from 1 to 7 and higher scores indicate higher quality of life. Simple means are used to calculate the overall AQLQ score (as well as domain scores).
Week 24
The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)
Time Frame: Week 52
The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) is a 32-item, 4-domain questionnaire with a 2-week recall period. Each item is scored using a 7-point likert scale where scores range from 1 to 7 and higher scores indicate higher quality of life. Simple means are used to calculate the overall AQLQ score (as well as domain scores).
Week 52
Functional residual lung capacity
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
Functional residual lung capacity
Time Frame: Week 52
Week 52
Residual lung volume
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
Residual lung volume
Time Frame: Week 52
Week 52
The ratio of residual volume over total lung capacity
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
The ratio of residual volume over total lung capacity
Time Frame: Week 52
Week 52
Pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (litres)
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
Pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (litres)
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
Pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (litres)
Time Frame: Week 52
Week 52
Pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (% predicted)
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
Pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (% predicted)
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
Pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (% predicted)
Time Frame: Week 52
Week 52
Pre-bronchodilator forced vital capacity (litres)
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
Pre-bronchodilator forced vital capacity (litres)
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
Pre-bronchodilator forced vital capacity (litres)
Time Frame: Week 52
Week 52
Pre-bronchodilator forced vital capacity (% predicted)
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
Pre-bronchodilator forced vital capacity (% predicted)
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
Pre-bronchodilator forced vital capacity (% predicted)
Time Frame: Week 52
Week 52
Pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second / forced vital capacity
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
Pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second / forced vital capacity
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
Pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second / forced vital capacity
Time Frame: Week 52
Week 52
Post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (litres)
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
Post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (litres)
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
Post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (litres)
Time Frame: Week 52
Week 52
Post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (% predicted)
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
Post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (% predicted)
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
Post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (% predicted)
Time Frame: Week 52
Week 52
Complete blood count
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
Complete blood count
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
Complete blood count
Time Frame: Week 52
Week 52
Club cell secretory protein (CCSP) (ng / ml)
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
Club cell secretory protein (CCSP) (ng / ml)
Time Frame: Week 52
Week 52
The ratio of expiratory to inspiratory mean lung density
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
The ratio of expiratory to inspiratory mean lung density
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
The ratio of expiratory to inspiratory mean lung density
Time Frame: Week 48
Week 48
LAA-850: The % lung attenuation area at -850 hounsfield units
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
LAA-850: The % lung attenuation area at -850 hounsfield units
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
LAA-850: The % lung attenuation area at -850 hounsfield units
Time Frame: Week 48
Week 48
The fractal dimension of LAA-850
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
The fractal dimension of LAA-850
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
The fractal dimension of LAA-850
Time Frame: Week 48
Week 48
LAA-950: The % lung attenuation area at -950 hounsfield units
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
LAA-950: The % lung attenuation area at -950 hounsfield units
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
LAA-950: The % lung attenuation area at -950 hounsfield units
Time Frame: Week 48
Week 48
The fractal dimension of LAA-950
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
The fractal dimension of LAA-950
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
The fractal dimension of LAA-950
Time Frame: Week 48
Week 48
Normalized bronchial parietal thickness
Time Frame: Week 0
From bronchial morphometry characterization on computed tomography scan
Week 0
Normalized bronchial parietal thickness
Time Frame: Week 24
From bronchial morphometry characterization on computed tomography scan
Week 24
Normalized bronchial parietal thickness
Time Frame: Week 48
From bronchial morphometry characterization on computed tomography scan
Week 48
Thickness of the sinus mucosa
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
Thickness of the sinus mucosa
Time Frame: Week 48
Week 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sébastien Bommart, MD PhD, University Hospitals of Montpellier, France

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 9, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 9, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on 48 weeks of Benralizumab

3
Subscribe