Assessment of Breast Cancer-Related Arm Lymphedema

November 23, 2021 updated by: Peking University People's Hospital

Assessment of Breast Cancer-Related Arm Lymphedema-Comparison of Traditional Measurement Methods and Indocyanine Green(ICG)Lymphography

Lymphedema is a serious complication of breast cancer treatment. Reported prevalence of lymphedema following treatment for breast cancer varies, ranging from 7-45%. The reason for the wide variation in the reported incidence of lymphedema is the different measurement techniques used and the absence of an agreed diagnostic criteria. Nowadays, the common method include limb circumference measurement、volume measurement、bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and self-report. Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages. A variety of publications have demonstrated the ability of bioimpedance to diagnose subclinical lymphedema. As a new method for detecting lymphedema, some study have also shown indocyanine green(ICG)lymphography can have a certain value for the detection of subclinical lymphedema. Early detection can reduce the incidence of late-stage lymphedema in postoperative patients. Therefore, we want to explore the ability of these methods. We are going to perform baseline arm circumference measurements and bioelectrical impedance measurements for all preoperative breast cancer patients in our center. In addition, the arm circumference measurement、volume measurement、bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) 、self-report and indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography will be performed on patients who go to the lymphedema clinic after breast cancer surgery. First, we want to establish the threshold and reference value range based on the impedance value of patients with lymphedema and people without lymphedema.Second, we are going to examine the relationship between the most commonly used methods of lymphedema and also to test which method is more sensitive for the diagnosis of clinical and subclinical lymphedema. Finally, we want to explore the ability of ICG lymphography in detecting sub-clinical lymphedema.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Breast cancer is a common malignant disease that threatens the health of women. As a serious complication of breast cancer treatment, lymphedema is caused by chronic accumulation of lymph fluid in the interstitial spaces of the affected limb or surrounding areas. Reported prevalence of lymphedema following treatment for breast cancer varies, ranging from 7-45%. One reason for the wide variation in the reported incidence of lymphedema is the different measurement techniques used and the absence of an agreed diagnostic criteria. Nowadays, the common method include limb circumference measurement、volume measurement、bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and self-report. Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages. A variety of publications have demonstrated the ability of bioimpedance to diagnose subclinical lymphedema. As a new method for detecting lymphedema, some study have also shown indocyanine green(ICG)lymphography can have a certain value for the detection of subclinical lymphedema. Early detection can reduce the incidence of late-stage lymphedema in postoperative patients. Therefore, we want to explore the ability of these methods. We are going to perform baseline arm circumference measurements and bioelectrical impedance measurements for all preoperative breast cancer patients in our center. In addition, the arm circumference measurement、volume measurement、bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) 、self-report and indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography will be performed on patients who go to the lymphedema clinic after breast cancer surgery.First, we want to establish the threshold and reference value range based on the impedance value of patients with lymphedema and people without lymphedema.Second, we are going to examine the relationship between the most commonly used methods of lymphedema and also to test which method is more sensitive for the diagnosis of clinical and subclinical lymphedema. Finally, we want to explore the ability of ICG lymphography in detecting sub-clinical lymphedema.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1600

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Peking University People's Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Group1: Patients who visit the clinic; Group2: Preoperative subjects diagnosed with breast cancer.

Description

The eligibility criteria for patients who visit the clinic:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with breast cancer who underwent axillary surgery.
  • Patients who have complaints about upper extremity lymphedema and are willing to undergo examination.
  • Sign the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral breast cancer.
  • A history of allergy to contrast agents.
  • There are arteriovenous thrombosis in the affected limb.
  • Regional lymph node recurrence
  • Did not sign informed consent.
  • Serious heart, brain and other diseases.
  • The primary lymphatic system diseases (such as lymphatic leakage).
  • Only one side of the limb received ICG angiography.

The eligibility criteria for preoperative subjects diagnosed with breast cancer:

Inclusion Criteria:

• Preoperative subjects diagnosed with breast cancer at our breast center.

Exclusion Criteria:

• We strictly excluded all possible causes of lymphedema. Subjects whose clinical stage of lymph node is N2 or higher were excluded. Subjects with lymphedema -related diseases or kidney disease, inflammatory breast cancer, a history of axillary surgery, radiotherapy to the upper limbs or the chest wall, soft tissue infection, pregnancy, congestive heart-failure, administration of diuretics (which may have significantly changed the hydration status) and implanted devices (e.g., pacemakers), were also excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients who visit clinic
Postoperative patients who have undergone axillary surgery for breast cancer and went to clinic due to complaints of upper limb discomfort.(The expected number of subjects in this group is 300)
All of these methods are used for patients visiting the lymphedema clinic to assess whether they have developed lymphedema.
Other Names:
  • ICG: indocyanine green
  • CM: circumference measurement
  • VD: volume displacement
Preoperative breast cancer patients
Preoperative subjects diagnosed with breast cancer were enrolled as non-lymphedema group. (The expected number of subjects in this group is 1300)
These two methods are routine evaluation methods for breast cancer patients before surgery
Other Names:
  • CM: circumference measurement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity and specificity of indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography
Time Frame: 2017-2022
Sensitivity means the ability of detecting patients with true lymphedema. Specificity means the ability of detecting non-lymphedema patients.
2017-2022
The incidence of lymphedema
Time Frame: 2017-2022
The incidence of lymphedema assessed by different methods when patients first visit clinic
2017-2022
The cutoff value of BIS
Time Frame: 2017-2022
studies on the threshold value established by Inbody 720 device have been extremely limited. We aimed to determine its reference range and cutoff values.
2017-2022
The occurrence of lymphedema after follow-up
Time Frame: 2017-2022
Patients who don't develop lymphedema when the first visit to the lymphedema clinic, the occurrence of lymphedema after follow-up.
2017-2022

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wang Shu, Peking University People's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Subscribe