Biological Classification of Mental Disorders (BeCOME)

October 18, 2023 updated by: Max-Planck-Institute of Psychiatry

The Biological Classification of Mental Disorders Study: Towards a New Taxonomy of Mental Disorders

BeCOME intends to include at least 1000 individuals with a broad spectrum of affective, anxiety and stress-related mental disorders as well as 500 individuals unaffected by mental disorders. After a screening visit, all participants undergo in-depth phenotyping procedures and omics assessments on two consecutive days. Several validated paradigms (e.g., fear conditioning, reward anticipation, imaging stress test) are applied to stimulate a response in a basic system of human functioning (e.g., acute threat response, reward processing, stress response) that plays a key role in the development of affective, anxiety and stress-related mental disorders. The response to this stimulation is then read out across multiple levels. Assessments comprise omics, physiological, neuroimaging, neurocognitive, psychophysiological and psychometric measurements. The multilevel information collected in BeCOME will be used to identify data-driven biologically-informed categories of mental disorders using cluster analytical techniques. A subgroup of affected individuals (patients of the outpatients clinic of the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry) are longitudinally observed regarding the stability of omics markers, vital parameters and symptom severity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background:

A major research finding in the field of Biological Psychiatry is that symptom-based categories of mental disorders map poorly onto dysfunctions in brain circuits or neurobiological pathways. Many of the identified (neuro)biological dysfunctions are "transdiagnostic", meaning that they do not reflect diagnostic boundaries but are shared by different ICD/DSM diagnoses. The compromised biological validity of the current classification system for mental disorders impedes rather than supports the development of treatments that not only target symptoms but also the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. The Biological Classification of Mental Disorders (BeCOME) study aims to identify biology-based classes of mental disorders that improve the translation of novel biomedical findings into tailored clinical applications.

Methods:

BeCOME intends to include at least 1000 affected individuals (recruited through advertisements/self-referral or visits in the institute's outpatient clinic or in collaborating practices) with a broad spectrum of affective, anxiety and stress-related mental disorders as well as 500 individuals unaffected by mental disorders (advertisements/self-referral). After a screening visit, all participants undergo in-depth phenotyping procedures and omics assessments on two consecutive days. Several validated paradigms (e.g., fear conditioning, reward anticipation, imaging stress test) are applied to stimulate a response in a basic system of human functioning (e.g., acute threat response, reward processing, stress response) that plays a key role in the development of affective, anxiety and stress-related mental disorders. The response to this stimulation is then read out across multiple levels. Assessments comprise omics, physiological, neuroimaging, neurocognitive, psychophysiological and psychometric measurements. The multilevel information collected in BeCOME will be used to identify data-driven biologically-informed categories of mental disorders using cluster analytical techniques. Moreover, the subgroup of patients from the outpatient clinic of the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry is followed-up at study days 14, 28 and 56 as well as 4 and 12 months after baseline for changes in a subset of parameters (omics, vital parameters and selected psychometric measures).

Discussion:

The novelty of BeCOME lies in the dynamic in-depth phenotyping and omics characterization of individuals with mental disorders from the depression and anxiety spectrum of varying severity. The investigators believe that such biology-based subclasses of mental disorders will serve as better treatment targets than purely symptom-based disease entities, and help in tailoring the right treatment to the individual patient suffering from a mental disorder. BeCOME has the potential to contribute to a novel taxonomy of mental disorders that integrates the underlying pathomechanisms into diagnoses.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Elisabeth B Binder, Prof. Dr. Dr.
  • Phone Number: +49 (0) 89-30622-586
  • Email: binder@psych.mpg.de

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Bavaria
      • Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 80804
        • Recruiting
        • Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry
        • Contact:
          • Elisabeth B Binder, Prof. Dr. Dr.
          • Phone Number: +49 (0) 89-30622-586
          • Email: binder@psych.mpg.de

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

individuals with varying degrees and a broad range of mental disorders from the anxiety and depression spectrum

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of an affective, anxiety or stress-related mental disorder according to the criteria of DSM-IV or DSM-5 (Depressive disorders;Anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorders: agoraphobia with and without panic disorder, panic disorder, social phobia, specific phobia, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder; Stress and trauma-associated mental disorders (e.g. posttraumatic stress disorder).
  • or no mental disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intake of any psychotropic medication/substance for a minimum of 2 months before study day 1.
  • Current illness in the field of organic mental disorders;
  • Affective disorders caused by a medical condition
  • Organic mental disorders (e.g. dementia)
  • Current disorders of schizophrenia;
  • Current eating disorder;
  • Mental retardation and profound developmental disorders;
  • Severe neurological or internal medical illness;
  • Posttraumatic or post-ischemic brain damage or elapsed cerebral hemorrhage;
  • Acute suicidality;
  • Pregnancy and postpartum period;
  • Magnetic resonance imaging contraindications (e.g. non-MR compatible metal implants including cardiac pacemakers, claustrophobia);
  • Myopia <-6 D, which cannot be compensated by contact lenses or MR compatible glasses (Cambridge Research Systems, Rochester, UK);
  • Current substance abuse;
  • Current or past substance dependence;
  • Risky alcohol consumption, screened with the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test - Consumption questions (AUDIT-C) and defined as score of ≥5 in males and of ≥4 in females.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
externally recruited participants
Self-referred affected and non-affected participants responding to advertisements
no intervention
In-house patients
Patients seeking treatment in the outpatient clinic of the Max-Planck-institute of Psychiatry
no intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identification of data-driven biologically-informed categories ("biotypes") of anxiety, depressive and stress-related mental disorders
Time Frame: cross-sectional (baseline)
The study is exploratory. Following an Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) approach, the study will use multi-level information for clustering of patients anxiety, depressive and stress-related mental disorders.
cross-sectional (baseline)
Comparison of the new biotypes (biological classification approach) to traditional symptom-based diagnostic categories (DIA-X/M-CIDI)
Time Frame: cross-sectional (baseline)
Assessment of anxiety, depressive and stress-related disorders using the diagnostic interview (computerized Munich version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, DIA-X/M-CIDI) according to the traditional classification approach in order to assess the distribution of "biotypes" across traditional diagnostic categories of affective and anxiety disorders.
cross-sectional (baseline)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stability/change in methylation over time
Time Frame: baseline and at days 14, 28 and 56 after baseline
longitudinal analysis only in patients who are treated at the MPIP (group 2), DNA extraction from blood for the determination of epigenetic markers (DNA methylation) for the determination of the stability of methylation patterns from baseline up to study day 56.
baseline and at days 14, 28 and 56 after baseline
Stability/change in body mass index (BMI) over time
Time Frame: baseline and at day 56 after baseline
longitudinal analysis only in patients who are treated at the MPIP (group 2), comparison of body mass index (BMI, calculated as kg/m^2) at study day 56 to body mass index at baseline
baseline and at day 56 after baseline
Stability/change in blood pressure over time
Time Frame: baseline and at days 14, 28 and 56 after baseline
longitudinal analysis only in patients who are treated at the MPIP (group 2), changes of blood pressure between baseline and study day 56.
baseline and at days 14, 28 and 56 after baseline
Stability/change in gene expression over time
Time Frame: baseline and at days 14, 28 and 56 after baseline
longitudinal analysis only in patients who are treated at the MPIP (group 2), messenger RNA extraction from blood for the determination of changes in gene expression from study day 1 up to study day 56.
baseline and at days 14, 28 and 56 after baseline
Stability/change in BDI-II (Beck-Depression-Inventory-II) sum score
Time Frame: baseline and every follow-up assessment: day 14, 28 and 56 as well as 4 and 12 months after baseline)
longitudinal analysis only in patients who are treated at the MPIP (group 2), Beck depression inventory, revised version (BDI-II) will be used for the assessment of changes in depression severity (indicated by the sum score, range from 0 to 63) from study day 1 up to 12 months after study day 1
baseline and every follow-up assessment: day 14, 28 and 56 as well as 4 and 12 months after baseline)
Stability/change in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS) sum score
Time Frame: baseline and every follow-up assessment: day 14, 28 and 56 as well as 4 and 12 months after baseline)
longitudinal analysis only in patients who are treated at the MPIP (group 2), the observer-based Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS) will be used for the assessment of changes in MADRS depression sum score (range from 0 to 60) from study day 1 up to 12 months after study day 1
baseline and every follow-up assessment: day 14, 28 and 56 as well as 4 and 12 months after baseline)
Stability/change in the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time Frame: baseline and every follow-up assessment: day 14, 28 and 56 as well as 4 and 12 months after baseline)
longitudinal analysis only in patients who are treated at the MPIP (group 2), the sum score of the state scale of the STAI (range from 20 to 80) will be used for the assessment of changes in state anxiety from study day 1 up to 12 months after study day 1
baseline and every follow-up assessment: day 14, 28 and 56 as well as 4 and 12 months after baseline)
Stability/change in the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS) score over time
Time Frame: baseline and every follow-up assessment: day 14, 28 and 56 as well as 4 and 12 months after baseline)
longitudinal analysis only in patients who are treated at the MPIP (group 2), the sum score of Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS), range from 0 to 65, will be used for the assessment of changes in the severity of panic and agoraphobia.
baseline and every follow-up assessment: day 14, 28 and 56 as well as 4 and 12 months after baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elisabeth B Binder, Prof. Dr. Dr., Max-Planck-Institute of Psychiatry

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 9, 2015

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on no intervention

Subscribe