Mindfulness-based Dance/Movement Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain

April 13, 2021 updated by: Drexel University

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and credibility of a mindfulness-based dance/movement therapy (M-DMT) protocol that is delivered online; to assess and improve methodological procedures for conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) test of M-DMT; and to demonstrate proof of principle by gathering information about the process of change between M-DMT and a control condition.

This is the first study to address the potential of M-DMT as a creative, non-opioid intervention for chronic back pain. Therefore, the findings of this study will provide important methodological and protocol data and substantive pilot data necessary for the next phase of this line of research, namely a fully powered RCT to evaluate efficacy and treatment mechanisms of action. Data obtained as part of this study will be instrumental for informing the systematic evaluation of M-DMT for chronic back pain care.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19102
        • Recruiting
        • Drexel Universitsy
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Bradt, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • age > 18 years
  • current non-specific cLBP that has persisted at least 3 months, and has resulted in pain on at least half the day in the past 6 months
  • proficient in English
  • average pain severity and interference ratings >3/10 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale
  • if taking pain medication(s), dosage must be stabilized for a minimum of 3 months
  • patients agree not to seek additional therapies for the duration of this study beyond those already included in their current treatment regimen or new treatments prescribed by their physician
  • naïve to DMT.
  • those who have adequate computer literacy (e.g., know how to use a computer to perform basic tasks such as open/send emails, use internet, fill-out online surveys) and access to the virtual delivery format (i.e., internet service and a personal computer device such as laptop, desktop, tablet PC).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • severe and/or progressive medical, neurological, substance dependence within the last 6 months or severe mental illness (i.e., psychosis, mania) that would prevent active participation
  • cognitive impairment that prohibits informed consent
  • back surgery in the last 6 months
  • low back pain attributable to a recognizable, known specific pathology (e.g. infection, tumor, osteoporosis, fracture, structural deformity, inflammatory disorder, radicular syndrome, or cauda equina syndrome
  • wheelchair-bound or unable to move without assistance
  • involvement in impending litigation or judgment for disability or worker's compensation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindfulness-based dance/movement therapy
Participants assigned to the M-DMT group condition will receive care as usual plus 12 weekly 90-minute group M-DMT sessions delivered online by a board-certified dance/movement therapist. The therapist is instructed to follow the M-DMT manualized protocol.
M-DMT includes benefits of physical activity, group psychotherapy, mindfulness training, and an art-based intervention in a unified practice. Each online session focuses on different psycho-educational topics about chronic low back pain management and links these topics with specific M-DMT activities that incorporate mindfulness-based principles and techniques.
Other Names:
  • Dance/Movement Therapy
Active Comparator: Chronic pain social support group
Participants assigned to the control condition will participate in a 12-session (90-minute session/week) online social support group.

The therapist will facilitate online open group discussions about participants' experiences with or reactions to the topic of discussion and will promote empathy among group members. The therapist will use client-centered, reflective listening techniques but will not prescribe any specific recommendations for change.

Each week, SSG participants will receive emails with brief information about the topic discussed during the group session.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of Recruitment: Number of participants eligible
Time Frame: Baseline
Number of participants eligible for randomization to the study intervention
Baseline
Recruitment Rate
Time Frame: Baseline
Proportion of participants randomized relative to total trial referrals
Baseline
Recruitment time
Time Frame: Baseline
Number of participate enrolled per month
Baseline
Feasibility of recruiting male participants: Proportion of male participant enrolled
Time Frame: Baseline
Proportion of male participant enrolled to the study
Baseline
Treatment Completion Rate
Time Frame: 12 weeks following receipt of treatment
We expect 80% of participants to complete at least 9/12 M-DMT sessions
12 weeks following receipt of treatment
Retention Rate
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Proportion of participants who complete follow-up questionnaires
24 weeks
Reason for withdrawal
Time Frame: 12 weeks following receipt of treatment
Assessed by an open-ended question, "What was the reason for discontinuing your participation?" administered by a study staff during a phone interview
12 weeks following receipt of treatment
M-DMT intervention credibility and expectancy
Time Frame: 1 week
Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (range 3-27; higher scores reflect greater treatment expectancy and rationale credibility)
1 week
Treatment Fidelity
Time Frame: 1-12 weeks
Treatment fidelity assessment form developed by the researcher (range: varies between sessions depending on the number of items included in the particular session; A total score of 80% and higher reflects adequate treatment fidelity)
1-12 weeks
Treatment satisfaction and acceptability: Likert-scale survey
Time Frame: 12 weeks post-randomization
via Likert-scale surveys; on scale of 1 to 5, 1 being not satisfied; 5 being very satisfied (i.e higher number, better outcome).
12 weeks post-randomization
M-DMT intervention acceptability
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Exit interview based on an interview protocol developed by the researcher
12 weeks
Adverse Event
Time Frame: 1 -12 weeks
Number of adverse events
1 -12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity: PROMIS® Pain Intensity-Short Form (SF)3a
Time Frame: Change from Baseline pain intensity at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
PROMIS® Pain Intensity-Short Form (SF)3a (A 5-point (from 1= Had no pain to 5= Very Severe) rating scale is used in each of the 3 items; higher results mean higher intensity of pain.
Change from Baseline pain intensity at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Pain interference: PROMIS® Pain Interference -8a
Time Frame: Change from Baseline pain interference at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
PROMIS® Pain Interference -8a (A 5-point (from 1= Not at all to 5= Very much) rating scale is used on each of the 8 items; higher scores reflect greater pain interference
Change from Baseline pain interference at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Chronic pain acceptance: Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from Baseline chronic pain acceptance at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (A seven-point (from 0= Never to 6 = Always) rating scale is used in each of the 20 items; higher results mean high pain acceptance)
Change from Baseline chronic pain acceptance at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Mindfulness
Time Frame: Change from Baseline mindfulness at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (A 4-point (Rarely/not at all to almost always) rating scale is used in each of the 12 items; higher values reflect higher mindful qualities
Change from Baseline mindfulness at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Physical activity (Accelerometry data)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline physical activity at 12, and 24-week time points
An accelerometer, ActiGraph GT9X will be used to measure the change in participants physical activity between baseline and 2 endpoints (12 and 24 weeks)
Change from Baseline physical activity at 12, and 24-week time points
Physical activity (Self-report data)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline physical activity at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Self-report assessment of physical activity will be done through UCLA Activity Scale (One item out of 10 will be checked to best describe current activity level)
Change from Baseline physical activity at 6, 12, and 24-week time points

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical Function
Time Frame: Change from Baseline physical function at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
PROMIS® Physical function-20a (A 5-point (5= without any difficulty to 1= Unable to do) rating scale is used in each of the 20 items; higher values reflect higher abilities to physically function
Change from Baseline physical function at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Depression
Time Frame: Change from Baseline depression at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
PROMIS® Emotional Distress-Depression-SF 4a (A 5-point (1= Never to 5= Always) rating scale is used in each of the 4 items; higher values reflect higher levels of depression
Change from Baseline depression at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Sleep Disturbance
Time Frame: Change from Baseline sleep disturbance at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
PROMIS® Sleep Disturbance-4a (A 5-point (5= Very poor to 1= Very good) rating scale is used in each of the 4 items; higher values reflect higher levels of sleep disturbances
Change from Baseline sleep disturbance at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Pain Catastrophizing: Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline pain catastrophizing at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Pain Catastrophizing Scale - short form(SF)-4a (A 4-point (0= Not at all to 4= All the time) rating scale is used in each of the 4 items; higher scores reflect greater pain catastrophizing
Change from Baseline pain catastrophizing at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: Change from Baseline kinesiophobia at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (A 4-point (1= Strongly disagree to 4= Strongly agree) rating scale is used in each of the 11 items; higher values reflect higher levels of kinesiophobia
Change from Baseline kinesiophobia at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Patient Perception of Change
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Score on single item Patient Global Impression of Change Rating (range: 1 (No change) to 7 (a great deal better))
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Minjung Shim, PhD, Drexel University
  • Principal Investigator: Adam Gonzalez, PHD, Stony Brook University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low-back Pain

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness-based dance/movement therapy (M-DMT)

3
Subscribe