Use of Multiparametric MRI in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer: a Prospective Analysis

February 23, 2022 updated by: Johan Abeloos, AZ Sint-Jan AV

Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer: a Prospective Analysis

The investigators aim to validate specific MRI parameters that could improve diagnostic accuracy of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with a squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region. Moreover, we aim to explore specific MRI parameters that could improve diagnostic accuracy of bone invasion and tumour relapse, as well as predict treatment response and survival in this target population.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: The locoregional control rates in patients with advanced head and neck cancer remain suboptimal. Accurate diagnosis of metastatic cervical lymph nodes, bone invasion, or tumour relapse in a previously irradiated or operated field remains challenging. Technological advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enable to quantify diffusion and perfusion of the tumour and its surrounding tissues, which could improve diagnostic performance. Moreover, they could provide additional information about radiation and/or chemotherapeutic efficiency in an individual patient.

Objectives: The investigators aim to validate specific MRI parameters that could improve diagnostic accuracy of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with a squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region. Moreover, we aim to explore specific MRI parameters that could improve diagnostic accuracy of bone invasion and tumour relapse, as well as predict treatment response and survival in this target population.

Methods: In this trial, a validation cohort will be recruited in a prospective manner, to validate the MRI parameters that showed clinically acceptable discriminant value based on the retrospective study. The values of the selected MRI parameters will be calculated in metastatic lymph nodes of the affected group, for comparison with their values measured in the lymph nodes of a prospectively recruited control group, comprising patients who require the same standardized MRI protocol for evaluation of a Whartin tumour or pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland without malignant transformation, and in whom both the parotid gland lesion and the cervical lymph node are surgically removed for histological confirmation. All included patients of the 'affected group' will also undergo a preoperative positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), according to international guidelines, and will preferably receive a multiparametric MRI at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post treatment as part of routine follow-up.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bruges, Belgium
        • Division of Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Surgery, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Histopathologically proven SCC in the HN region (affected group)

- Histopathologically proven Whartin tumour or pleomorphic adenoma in the HN region without malignant transformation (control group)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who received a pretreatment multiparametric MRI according to a standardized protocol
  • Histopathologically proven SCC in the HN region (affected group)
  • Histopathologically proven Whartin tumour or pleomorphic adenoma in the HN region without malignant transformation (control group)
  • Patients in whom a or multiple clearly distinguishable cervical lymph node(s) can be observed radiologically, and which can be correlated unambiguously with the pathology report

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not fulfilling abovementioned criteria
  • thyroid or skin cancer
  • considerable artefact on MRI
  • previously surgery, irradiation or chemotherapy in the HN region

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
affected
All patients with a histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region
control
Whartin tumour or pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland without malignant transformation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
discriminatory value of MRI perfusion curve between tumoural and non-tumoural cervical lymph nodes
Time Frame: preoperative
MRI parameters will be considered validated if they enable differentiation between a metastatic cervical lymph node and a non-tumoural lymph node, as based on the final pathology report as the 'gold standard'
preoperative
discriminatory value of MRI ADC value between tumoural and non-tumoural cervical lymph nodes
Time Frame: preoperative
MRI parameters will be considered validated if they enable differentiation between a metastatic cervical lymph node and a non-tumoural lymph node, as based on the final pathology report as the 'gold standard'
preoperative
discriminatory value of MRI D value between tumoural and non-tumoural cervical lymph nodes
Time Frame: preoperative
MRI parameters will be considered validated if they enable differentiation between a metastatic cervical lymph node and a non-tumoural lymph node, as based on the final pathology report as the 'gold standard'
preoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
discriminatory value of perfusion curve between bone invasion and no bone invasion
Time Frame: preoperative
MRI parameters will be considered validated if they enable differentiation between tumoural bone invasion and no bone invasion, as based on the final pathology report as the 'gold standard'
preoperative
discriminatory value of predefined perfusion curve between post-therapeutic sequelae and tumour relapse
Time Frame: follow-up until 5 years postoperative
MRI parameters will be considered validated if they enable differentiation between post-therapeutic sequelae and tumour relapse, as based on the final pathology report as the 'gold standard'
follow-up until 5 years postoperative
predictive value of the MRI parameter Ktrans for treatment outcome
Time Frame: end of adjuvant radiochemotherapy (approx 10 weeks postoperative)
predictive value of MRI parameters for treatment outcome, measured through tumoural response at therapy end based on the RECIST criteria
end of adjuvant radiochemotherapy (approx 10 weeks postoperative)
predictive value of predefined Ktrans for overall and disease-free survival
Time Frame: postoperative follow-up at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36,48 and 60 months
predictive value of MRI parameters for treatment outcome, measured through tumoural response at therapy end based on the RECIST criteria
postoperative follow-up at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36,48 and 60 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Johan Abeloos, MD, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • B049201838067

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Head and Neck Cancer

3
Subscribe