The Comparison of HYAJOINT Plus and Hyalgan Hyaluronan Supplement for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain

August 22, 2018 updated by: SciVision Biotech Inc.

Safety and Effectiveness of HYAJOINT Plus Synovial Fluid Supplement for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Pain

The aim of this study was to compare single injection HYAJOINT Plus Synovial Fluid Supplement used on the single and repeat treatment of knee osteoarthritis that has the same safety and effectiveness as three-injection hyaluronan, Hyalgan.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The study was a random, evaluator-blinded, controlled, single center clinical trial. Recruiting patients who have been suffered from the osteoarthritis pain under conventional nonpharmacologic therapy or analgesics for a long time and randomly divided into two groups, HYAJOINT Plus or Hyalgan group, when the inclusion criteria was met and the inform consent was obtained. They were followed for 56 weeks including visits at 4, 12, 26, 39, and 52 weeks post-treatment for the safety and effectiveness evaluation. After complete 52-week visit, subjects would received HYAJOINT Plus on the target knee. These subjects were followed for 4 weeks to assess the safety of repeat treatment or cross reactions of the use from three-injections to single-injection hyaluronan treatment. The primary endpoints were the incidence of any adverse events during the study, as well as the objective assessment of pain visual analog scale at baseline and every visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic knee osteoarthritis for at least 6 months despite nonoperative treatment and/or physical therapy
  • Average knee pain score ≧ 30 mm on a 100-mm VAS
  • Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3 knee osteoarthritis based on radiographs taken within previous 6 months 18
  • If the VAS pain score of the contralateral knee with radiographic evidence of bilateral knee osteoarthritis was < 30 mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hip OA
  • Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4 on target knee
  • Clinical apparent active symptoms like infections
  • Intra-articular injections of hyaluronan within the past 6 months
  • Previous orthopaedic surgery on spine or lower limb
  • Intra-articular injections of steroid type drugs within the past 3 months
  • Diagnosed as Lupus erythematosus, Rheumatoid arthritis, Hemiparesis, Neoplasm or received hemodialysis
  • Known allergy to avian proteins or hyaluronic acid products
  • Women ascertained or suspected pregnancy or lactating

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HYAJOINT Plus group
The HYAJOINT Plus group received one intraarticular injection of 3 ml HYAJOINT Plus and be followed for 52 weeks. A single injection of HYAJOINT Plus was performed if criteria was met at 52 weeks, and a 4-weeks follow-up of adverse events was conducted.
Single-injection, 60 mg / 3 ml (2%) cross-linked hyaluronan
Active Comparator: Hyalgan group
The Hyalgan group received intraarticular injection of 2 ml Hyalgan for three continuously weeks and be followed for 52 weeks. A single injection of HYAJOINT Plus was performed if criteria was met at 52 weeks, and a 4-weeks follow-up of adverse events was conducted.
Three-injection, 20 mg / 2 ml (1%) linear hyaluronan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS pain score
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The change from baseline in a Visual analog scale score for pain. The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'no pain' and '100' with 'worst pain'.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The reported adverse events
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
Any adverse events reported by the patients during the study period and physical examination findings by the evaluator after injections and at each follow-up visit.
1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
WOMAC, Likert Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
a 24-item questionnaire with 3 subscales measuring pain, stiffness, and physical function. Total score is 96 and lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
VAS stiffness score
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The change from baseline in the Visual analog scale score for stiffness. The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'no stiffness' and '100' with 'worst stiffness'.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
Timed Up-and-Go test (TUG)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
A simple measurement of time in seconds for a subject to rise from an armchair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
VAS satisfaction score
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
Patients rate their treatment satisfaction based on a 100 mm VAS. The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'least satisfaction' and '100' with 'highest satisfaction'.
1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 4, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 19, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 12, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on HYAJOINT Plus

3
Subscribe