Impact of a Breath-controlled Video Game App

Impact of a Breath-controlled Video Game App on Preoperative Anxiety, Induction Behavior and Parent Experience: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The proposed research study will assess the impact of a newly developed, breath-controlled app and custom-designed tablet (equipped with a breathing sensor) on the patient and parent's preoperative anxiety and anesthesia induction experience.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Aim 1: Determine whether induction distress differs between patients using the breathing-controlled app and those using standard care interventions: The investigators will measure patient compliance with induction using the Child Induction Behavioral Assessment (CIBA). The investigators predict that patients using the breathing-controlled app will demonstrate significantly better induction compliance. Older children (ages 6-8) are typically more cooperative with induction than younger children (ages 3-5 years). Both age groups will be studied to determine whether there are age-related differences impacting receptiveness to the app.

Aim 2: Compare patient anxiety between the breath-controlled app and control group. The investigators will measure child preoperative anxiety (modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale, the "mYPAS-SF"). The investigators predict there will be significantly lower anxiety (mYPAS-SF) during induction for children in the breath-controlled app group.

Aim 3: Compare parent anxiety between the breath-controlled app and control group. The investigators will measure parental anxiety using the Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety, the "VAS-A". The investigators predict there will be significantly lower anxiety (mYPAS-SF) during induction for parents in the breath-controlled app group.

Aim 4: Determine overall family satisfaction with the induction experience. A survey will be administered to assess satisfaction levels with induction behavioral interventions and determine whether these scores differ between the intervention and standard care group. The investigators predict that satisfaction scores will be higher in the intervention group than the control group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 8 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presenting to Same Day Surgery department at CCHMC Liberty campus
  • Outpatient or 23 hour admission
  • Any surgery or procedure under anesthesia
  • Ages 3 to 8 years
  • Male or female
  • Any ethnicity
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification status I or II
  • Patient has never had a prior anesthetic
  • Family and participant communicate primarily in English & signed English anesthesia consent
  • Normal neurocognitive development
  • Patient is undergoing inhalation induction using an anesthesia mask
  • Parent/guardian is present for induction
  • Patient does not receive a premedication for anxiety

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurocognitive delays
  • Developmental delays/Behavioral diagnoses, such as (but not limited to) ADHD, Autism, Oppositional defiant disorder, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, Anxiety disorder
  • Patient takes medications routinely for behavioral issues
  • Tracheostomy
  • Inpatient or planned >23 hour admission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: standard care
Standard care non-pharmacologic interventions during anesthesia induction
standard care non-pharmacologic interventions during anesthesia induction
Experimental: breath-controlled app
breath-controlled app and custom-designed tablet (equipped with a breathing sensor)
breath-controlled app and custom-designed tablet (equipped with a breathing sensor)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary aim (induction distress)
Time Frame: During anesthesia induction
Induction distress (Child induction behavioral assessment tool, the "CIBA"), scored by reviewing behavioral descriptions of 3 categories, "Smooth, "Moderate", or "Difficult"
During anesthesia induction

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary aim (anxiety)
Time Frame: Child preoperative anxiety (in Same Day Surgery) and anxiety during anesthesia induction (measured during induction)
Child anxiety (modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale, the "mYPAS-SF"), scored 23-100, 100 = highest anxiety score
Child preoperative anxiety (in Same Day Surgery) and anxiety during anesthesia induction (measured during induction)
Secondary aim (anxiety)
Time Frame: Parental preoperative anxiety (in Same Day Surgery) and anxiety during anesthesia induction (measured immediately after induction)
Parental anxiety (Visual Analog Scale for anxiety, the "VAS-A"), scored 0-100, 100 = highest anxiety score
Parental preoperative anxiety (in Same Day Surgery) and anxiety during anesthesia induction (measured immediately after induction)
Secondary aim (satisfaction)
Time Frame: Immediatly after anesthesia induction
Family satisfaction with the induction experience (survey, Likert scale, 1= poor; 10 = excellent)
Immediatly after anesthesia induction

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abby Hess, DNP, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 26, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 27, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019-0654

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety Acute

Clinical Trials on standard care

3
Subscribe