The Pathogenesis of Chronic Diarrhoea After Treatment for Cancer in Cecum and the Ascending Colon

August 31, 2021 updated by: University of Aarhus

Many patients suffer from chronic diarrhoea after surgical treatment for cancer in the right side of the colon.

The investigators' main hypothesis is that colon cancer patients with chronic diarrhoea have a higher risk of bile acid malabsorption compared with colon cancer patients without diarrhoea.

The investigators also expect that a part of the cases of bile acid malabsorption is caused by underlying bacterial overgrowth in the small bowel.

The investigators assume that patients with severe bile acid malabsorption have a lower value of FGF19 in the blood compared to patients with moderate or none bile acid malabsorption.

Furthermore, it is assumed that patients with chronic diarrhoea and documented bile acid malabsorption after surgical treatment for right-sided colon cancer will get improved bowel function when treated with a bile acid binder, or antibiotics in case of bacterial overgrowth.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Patients with chronic diarrhoea after surgical treatment of right-sided colon cancer will be compared to patients without diarrhoea after right-sided colon cancer treatment.

All patients will be asked to answer a short questionnaire regarding bowel function, and they will all have standard blood tests taken to exclude non-cancer related causes of diarrhoea. Besides these standard tests, the value of FGF19 will be measured in a blood sample from the fasting participants. All participants will undergo SeHCAT scan to determine the presence of bile acid malabsorption among right-sided colon cancer patients with and without diarrhoea. In addition, a glucose breath test will be performed to examine, if the patients have small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.

Patients with a positive glucose breath test, and thus bacterial overgrowth, will be treated with antibiotics, followed by another SeHCAT scan, glucose breath test, and measurement of gastrointestinal transit time. In addition, they will be asked to complete the questionnaire regarding bowel function again. All cases with an abnormal SeHCAT scan will be treated with a bile acid binder, and the patients will be asked to complete the questionnaire one more time, and the GITT measurement will be repeated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8200
        • Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary adenocarcinoma in cecum or the ascending colon
  • Right-sided hemicolectomy
  • Understanding, speaking and reading Danish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous major gastrointestinal, urological or gynaecological surgery or oncological treatment
  • Radiation therapy
  • Recurrence of colon cancer
  • Metastasis
  • Permanent stoma
  • Pregnancy
  • Reduced cognitive level that makes it plausible that the patient do not understand the study or is not capable of participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Positive breath test
Patients with a positive breath test are treated with antibiotics.
Ciprofloxacin or Rifaximin for 10 days.
Active Comparator: Positive SeHCAT scan
Patients with a positive SeHCAT scan are treated with a bile acid binder.
Cholestyramine or Colesevelam lifelong.
No Intervention: No intervention
Patients with a normal breath test and a normal SeHCAT scan receive no intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in SeHCAT retention after 7 days.
Time Frame: The SeHCAT scan consists of a baseline measurement and a measurement after 7 days.
The diagnosis of bile acid malabsorption in cases vs. controls is determined by a positive SeHCAT scan.
The SeHCAT scan consists of a baseline measurement and a measurement after 7 days.
Serum concentration of FGF19
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 month.
The serum value of FGF19 is measured by a blood sample.
Through study completion, an average of 1 month.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of bacteria in the small bowel
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 month.
The diagnosis of bacterial overgrowth in the small bowel is determined by a breath test.
Through study completion, an average of 1 month.
Symptom relief after treatment with antibiotics or bile acid binder
Time Frame: After 3 months.
This will be estimated based on self-reported symptoms: A bowel function questionnaire with 30 questions regarding different aspects of bowel function. The patients should state if they have the symptoms daily, 1-6 times per week, less than once a week, or never.
After 3 months.
Quality of life after treatment with antibiotics or bile acid binder
Time Frame: After 3 months.
This will be estimated based on self-reported symptoms: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 version 3.0. A questionnaire with 30 individual questions summing up to form one global health status, five functional subscales, three symptom scales and six single items addressing different aspects of quality of life. The scales range from 0-100 with a higher score representing a higher level of functioning or a higher degree of symptoms, respectively.
After 3 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Søren Laurberg, MD DMSc, Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 28, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 26, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 26, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1-10-72-301-16
  • 1-16-02-137-17 (Other Identifier: Danish Data Protection Agency)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diarrhea

Clinical Trials on Antibiotics

Subscribe