- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04041817
Pulmonary and Ventilatory Effects of Trigger Modulation in Intubated ICU (Trigger)
Pulmonary and Ventilatory Effects of Trigger Modulation in Intubated ICU Patients Spontaneously Breathing With Pressure Support Ventilation. A Physiopathology Exploratory Study.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The use of invasive mechanical ventilation is one of the most frequent therapies in intensive care units (ICUs). There are several types of indications, depending on the failure: essentially neurological, hemodynamic or respiratory.
In recent years, the notion of lung damage induced by mechanical ventilation (VILI) has led to major changes in ventilator settings in both ICUs and operative rooms (Ors). The reduction of the tidal volume (TV) to 6-8 mL/kg of ideal body weight, the use of an individualized positive end-of-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the possible use of pulmonary aeration optimization therapies (alveolar recruitment manoeuvres, prone positioning sessions...) have become essential to increase patient's survival.
Withdrawal of invasive mechanical ventilation remains a daily issue and traditionally requires the transition from fully controlled ventilation to pressure support ventilation. Among specific settings of the latter, the adjustment of the trigger value (or threshold for triggering the ventilator) has not been explored to date. The trigger threshold corresponds to the sensitivity of the ventilator to detect patient's inspiratory effort and then deliver the predefined pressure support to inflate the lungs and deliver a tidal volume. The lower (or more sensitive) the trigger threshold, the smallest patient's effort will be rewarded. On the other hand, the higher the threshold, the greater the inspiratory effort required from the patient. Usually, this value is set by default to the minimum level to avoid self-triggering of the ventilator. With the objective to optimize pulmonary aeration, the use of higher trigger levels could increase diaphragmatic work (with a potential re-training and reinforcement effect) and contribute to better alveolar recruitment in the postero-inferior territories that are traditionally the most impacted, following a higher diaphragmatic motion. The authors propose to explore the impact of different trigger levels on pulmonary aeration (evaluated by electrical impedance tomography) and ventilatory parameters, in order to validate our hypotheses and before considering a trial with the objective of defining individualized trigger levels, according to patient's respiratory mechanics and pulmonary parenchyma morphology, with potential benefits on ventilator weaning.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63000
- Service de Réanimation Adultes et Soins Continus
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years
- Patient hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit of Clermont-Ferrand's Hospital
- Patients with mechanical invasive ventilation in spontaneous ventilation with inspiratory support (intubation or tracheostomy)
- Trigger level set to minimum
- Patient under sedation compatible with spontaneous ventilation (SV) with inspiratory support (AI) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEP) Patient calm (RASS between -2 and 0) Consent for participation or consent from patient's next of kin or inclusion according to an emergency procedure Patient benefiting from the French social security scheme
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to participate in the proposed study
Contraindication to the installation of a nasogastric tube:
- Severe disorder of uncorrected blood clotting
- Known nasosinus lesion
- Oesophageal varices recently ligated (<48h)
Contraindication to the use of the electro-impedancemetry technique by tomography
- Thoracic lesions
- Chest dressings
- Pace-maker / Implantable Defibrillator
- Known lesion of central respiratory centers, including patients with neurological injury
- Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (according to Berlin criteria)
- Patients with restrictive or obstructive pulmonary pathology
- Patients admitted post-operatively for surgery that may affect the diaphragmatic function ( thoracic or abdominal supra-mesocolic)
- Patients with abdominal distention (ileus, intra-abdominal hyperpressure)
- Patient whose BMI is greater than 35 kg.m-2
- Pregnant patient
- Patient under guardianship,
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Trigger increasing steps
Trigger variations will be performed following increasing steps of 2 L/min every 15 minutes. End expiratory lung volume and lung aeration will be conducted using elecrical impedance tomography. Diaphragmatic motion and thickening will be analyzed by ultrasonography. Work of breathing will be evaluated using gastric and oesophageal pressure measurements. Measurements will be conducted during the last minute of each step. |
Trigger variations will be performed following increasing steps of 3 L/min every 15 minutes, from 0.2 to 15 L/min (0.2 - 3 - 6 - 9 - 12 - 15).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Lung volume (end expiratory lung volume, EELV) at each trigger level
Time Frame: T0 (before the first trigger step)
|
The main endpoint is the difference between the lung volume (EELV) measured by electroimpedancemetry by tomography (EIT) at the end of each trigger level (15th minute) and the basal value measured at the beginning of the protocol
|
T0 (before the first trigger step)
|
|
Lung volume (end expiratory lung volume, EELV) at each trigger level
Time Frame: T15 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°1)
|
The main endpoint is the difference between the lung volume (EELV) measured by electroimpedancemetry by tomography (EIT) at the end of each trigger level (15th minute) and the basal value measured at the beginning of the protocol
|
T15 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°1)
|
|
Lung volume (end expiratory lung volume, EELV) at each trigger level
Time Frame: T30 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°2)
|
The main endpoint is the difference between the lung volume (EELV) measured by electroimpedancemetry by tomography (EIT) at the end of each trigger level (15th minute) and the basal value measured at the beginning of the protocol
|
T30 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°2)
|
|
Lung volume (end expiratory lung volume, EELV) at each trigger level
Time Frame: T45 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°3)
|
The main endpoint is the difference between the lung volume (EELV) measured by electroimpedancemetry by tomography (EIT) at the end of each trigger level (15th minute) and the basal value measured at the beginning of the protocol
|
T45 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°3)
|
|
Lung volume (end expiratory lung volume, EELV) at each trigger level
Time Frame: T60 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°4)
|
The main endpoint is the difference between the lung volume (EELV) measured by electroimpedancemetry by tomography (EIT) at the end of each trigger level (15th minute) and the basal value measured at the beginning of the protocol
|
T60 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°4)
|
|
Lung volume (end expiratory lung volume, EELV) at each trigger level
Time Frame: T75 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°5)
|
The main endpoint is the difference between the lung volume (EELV) measured by electroimpedancemetry by tomography (EIT) at the end of each trigger level (15th minute) and the basal value measured at the beginning of the protocol
|
T75 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°5)
|
|
Lung volume (end expiratory lung volume, EELV) at each trigger level
Time Frame: T90 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°6)
|
The main endpoint is the difference between the lung volume (EELV) measured by electroimpedancemetry by tomography (EIT) at the end of each trigger level (15th minute) and the basal value measured at the beginning of the protocol
|
T90 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°6)
|
|
Lung volume (end expiratory lung volume, EELV) at each trigger level
Time Frame: T105 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°7)
|
The main endpoint is the difference between the lung volume (EELV) measured by electroimpedancemetry by tomography (EIT) at the end of each trigger level (15th minute) and the basal value measured at the beginning of the protocol
|
T105 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°7)
|
|
Lung volume (end expiratory lung volume, EELV) at each trigger level
Time Frame: T120 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°8)
|
The main endpoint is the difference between the lung volume (EELV) measured by electroimpedancemetry by tomography (EIT) at the end of each trigger level (15th minute) and the basal value measured at the beginning of the protocol
|
T120 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°8)
|
|
Lung volume (end expiratory lung volume, EELV) at each trigger level
Time Frame: T135 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°9)
|
The main endpoint is the difference between the lung volume (EELV) measured by electroimpedancemetry by tomography (EIT) at the end of each trigger level (15th minute) and the basal value measured at the beginning of the protocol
|
T135 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°9)
|
|
Lung volume (end expiratory lung volume, EELV) at each trigger level
Time Frame: T150 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°10)
|
The main endpoint is the difference between the lung volume (EELV) measured by electroimpedancemetry by tomography (EIT) at the end of each trigger level (15th minute) and the basal value measured at the beginning of the protocol
|
T150 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°10)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Homogeneity of pulmonary aeration
Time Frame: Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
Evaluation of homogeneity of pulmonary aeration with Center Of Ventilation by EIT
|
Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
|
Homogeneity of pulmonary aeration
Time Frame: Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
Evaluation of homogeneity of pulmonary aeration with Global Inhomogeneity index by EIT
|
Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
|
Regional impedance variation
Time Frame: Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
Evaluation of regional impedance variation (TIV: Tidal Impedance Variation) by EIT
|
Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
|
Atelectrauma
Time Frame: Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
Assessement of atelectrauma (RVD: Regional Ventilation Delay) by EIT
|
Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
|
Lung volume variations
Time Frame: Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
Evaluation of lung volume variations by EIT (EELI : End Expiratory Lung Impedance)
|
Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
|
Transpulmonary pressure
Time Frame: Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
Evaluation of maximum transpulmonary pressure (alveolar stress)
|
Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
|
Alveolar strain defined as the ratio between tidal volume and Functional Residual Capacity
Time Frame: Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
Alveolar strain defined as the ratio between tidal volume and Functional Residual Capacity
|
Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
|
Transpulmonary driving pressure
Time Frame: Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
Evaluation of transpulmonary driving pressure
|
Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
|
Work of breathing
Time Frame: Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
Evaluation of work of breathing (WOB) value (P01)
|
Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
|
Work of breathing
Time Frame: Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
Evaluation of inspiratory occlusion pressure values (P01)
|
Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
|
Energy delivered
Time Frame: Measurement during the last minute of each trigger step
|
Evaluation of energy delivered to lungs patient
|
Measurement during the last minute of each trigger step
|
|
Diaphragm thickening
Time Frame: Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
Evaluation of the diaphragmatic thickening by ultrasound
|
Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
|
Diaphragm motion
Time Frame: Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
Evaluation of the diaphragmatic motion by ultrasound
|
Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
|
Patient's weight
Time Frame: Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
Study of the impact of patient's weight
|
Through study completion, 150 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Trigger - RBHP 2018 GODET
- 2018-A03307-48 (Other Identifier: ANSM)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on ICU Patients
-
University of LuebeckRecruiting
-
University of UtahCompleted
-
Lebanese American University Medical CenterUnknown
-
Medical University of GdanskUniversité de MontréalNot yet recruitingICU Patients | Caregiver
-
Montefiore Medical CenterCompleted
-
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of MunichUniversity Hospital Muenster; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, GermanyUnknown
-
Hospital Departamental de VillavicencioCooperative University of Colombia; Clínica PrimaveraRecruitingTrauma Injury | Trauma Patients in ICU | Trauma (Including Fractures) | Trauma Patients | Trauma ICU PatientsColombia
-
Ali YalmanCompletedIntubated ICU PatientsTurkey (Türkiye)
Clinical Trials on Trigger setting of pressure support ventilation
-
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustUnknownCOPD | Neuromuscular Disease | Chest Wall Disease | Obesity HypoventilationUnited Kingdom
-
Capital Medical UniversityRecruitingVentilator-Induced Lung Injury | Critical Care | Acute Hypoxic Respiratory FailureChina
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensCompletedCOPD Exacerbation | Weaning FailureFrance
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensWithdrawnNoctural Ventilatory Mode and Weaning DurationFrance
-
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and...CompletedChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | Invasive Mechanical Ventilation | Adaptive Support VentilationIndia
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown
-
Universidade Federal de PernambucoReal Hospital Português de Beneficência em PernambucoCompleted
-
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)Cystic Fibrosis FoundationSuspended
-
Izmir Dr Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Surgery...CompletedRespiratory Failure | All Intubated PatientsTurkey
-
Massachusetts General HospitalMedtronic - MITGTerminatedRespiration, ArtificialUnited States