Comparison of Coronary Lithoplasty and Rotablation

November 30, 2023 updated by: University of Giessen

Comparison of Coronary Lithoplasty and Rotablation for the Interventional Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Stenoses - ROTA.Shock-Trial

This study compares a new method of treating severely calcified coronary lesions, the intracoronary lithoplasty, with the current gold standard, the rotablation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Severe coronary calcification is still a challenge for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Reduction of the calcified plaque mass is necessary to achieve adequate stent expansion during further course. Rotablation has been the only reliable option to treat extremely calcified coronary lesions for a long time. Coronary lithoplasty has been recently introduced as a new promising treatment option in this special subset. It provides the unique opportunity to break severely calcified plaque structures even inside deeper layers of the vessel wall. Aim of this study is to compare rotablation and coronary lithotripsy for treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions. Plaque structure, plaque volume, as well as lumen diameters will be analyzed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) before and after debulking, as well as after stent implantation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gießen, Germany, 35392
        • University of Gießen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age>18 yrs
  • Stable coronary heart disease or acute coronary syndromes
  • Single or multi vessel disease. Vessel is defined as, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries. Any branch within the vessel is considered part of the vessel.
  • Written informed consent was obtained before the procedure
  • Severely calcified coronary lesion with indication for rotablation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known renal insufficiency (serum creatinine clearance <30ml/min/1.73m² or receiving dialysis)
  • Known allergy against protocol-required medications including ASS, prasugrel, ticagrelor, clopidogrel, heparin. History of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Lesion length > 32mm
  • Bifurcation lesions requiring 2-Stent-Strategies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Rotablation
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention using Rotablation
Experimental: Coronary Lithoplasty
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention using Lithoplasty

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Minimal Stent Area (End of the Procedure)
Time Frame: 0 days
0 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Minimal/Mean/Maximal Stent Diameter
Time Frame: 0 days
0 days
Minimal/Mean/Maximal Lumen area
Time Frame: 0 days
0 days
Minimal/Mean/Maximal Lumen diameter
Time Frame: 0 days
0 days
Mean/Maximal Stent area
Time Frame: 0 days
0 days
Incidence of target lesion failure
Time Frame: 0 months; 1 month; 6 months
0 months; 1 month; 6 months
Incidence of target vessel failure
Time Frame: 0 months; 1 month; 6 months
0 months; 1 month; 6 months
MACE rate
Time Frame: 0 months; 1 month; 6 months
0 months; 1 month; 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Florian Blachutzik, Dr., University of Gießen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 28, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 28, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 28, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Rotablation

Subscribe