Search for Biomarkers of Neurodegenerative Diseases in Idiopathic REM Sleep Behavior Disorder

August 5, 2021 updated by: Dr. Zhang Jihui, Chinese University of Hong Kong

A 7-year Prospective Study of Idiopathic REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Cohort in Chinese Population: Determining the Optimal Characteristics of Biomarkers to Predict Neurodegenerative Diseases

This study is a prospective study with a mean of 7-year follow-up interval, aims to monitor the progression of α-synucleinopathy neurodegeneration by the evolution of prodromal markers and development of clinical disorders in patients with idiopathic REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (iRBD) and healthy controls.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a parasomnia characterized by dream enactment behaviors and REM sleep without muscle atonia (excessive EMG activity) during REM sleep.Increasing studies revealed that iRBD eventually converts to α-synucleinopathy, such as Parkinson's disease (PD), dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB), and multiple system atrophy (MSA). Recent studies reported that over 80% of patients with iRBD eventually developed neurodegeneration at a mean interval of 14 years after iRBD onset or diagnosed. Thus, iRBD is regarded as a precursor of α-synucleinopathies. In addition to iRBD, a large series of other non-motor symptoms also present before the emergence of typical motor symptoms of PD, including autonomic dysfunction, olfactory loss, color vision impairment, neurocognitive impairment,neuroimaging of dopamine dysfunction, daytime sleepiness, and psychiatric disorders. In recent years, several longitudinal studies have found that patients with iRBD with a higher rate of these markers may have a faster progression of neurodegeneration. On the other hand, a variety of external risk factors of PD including environmental toxic exposure, lifestyle factors, and some medications have long been recognized, which affect numerous fundamental cellular processes by interaction with genetic predisposition.

However, several knowledge gaps still need further studies to uncover. First, few studies have explored the predictive value of dynamic change of biomarkers in prodromal stage of PD. Second, few previous prospective studies also employed a control group to compare the change of these prodromal markers between patients and healthy controls over time. Third, as some of previous studies employed a retrospective study design, potential recall bias may contaminate the results. Moreover, the sample sizes of most previous studies investigating biomarkers were relative small (n < 80) and follow-up durations in most study are relatively short, which may have limited the statistical power to detect the risk factors with mild to moderate effect size. Finally, as previous reported longitudinal studies of iRBD mainly focused on Caucasian or other ethnic groups, there is only limited data about neurodegenerative biomarkers in Chinese iRBD. In conclusion, prospective longitudinal studies with larger sample size, regular follow-up, and relative long follow-up duration are needed to better map the progression of neurodegeneration.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

182

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Department of psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The participants in this proposed study will be recruited from our on-going cohort of RBD and control

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

for iRBD at baseline:

  1. Fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for iRBD. As patients with iRBD were recruited during a long period, the diagnosis of RBD was based on ICSD and ICSD-2 (before 2014), and ICSD-3 (2014 and thereafter) criteria. The diagnosis for all patients were confirmed by video-PSG. In summary, patient diagnosed with RBD should present excessive EMG activity during REM sleep on video-PSG assessment and report a history of repeated dream enactment behaviors;
  2. Having neurocognitive test and neurological examination since 2008;
  3. Free of neurodegenerative diseases at the last visit.

for controls without iRBD at baseline:

  1. Age- and sex- matched with patients with iRBD;
  2. Free of narcolepsy and other neurological diseases;
  3. Without any RBD features as confirmed by both clinical history and video-PSG;
  4. Without neurodegenerative diseases;
  5. Having neurocognitive test and neurological examination at baseline.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with narcolepsy;
  2. Patients with known neurodegenerative diseases;
  3. Pseudo-RBD (e.g., RBD symptoms were eliminated after severe obstructive sleep apnea had treated with continuous positive airway pressure therapy.);
  4. Early-onset RBD (e.g., before the age of 50 years old) which might have a different pathogenesis from iRBD.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder
Subjects with the diagnosis of idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder
Controls without iRBD
Healthy controls without the diagnosis of idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The overall conversion rate of iRBD to neurodegenerative diseases
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 7 year follow up
The overall conversion rate of iRBD to neurodegenerative diseases. The diagnoses of neurodegenerative diseases will be ascertained by neurologists according to the standard diagnostic criteria.
Changes from baseline to 7 year follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes of the likelihood ratio of probability of prodromal Parkinson's disease in each individual
Time Frame: Baseline and 7 year
The dynamic changes of the likelihood ratio of probability of prodromal Parkinson's disease in the patients with iRBD and healthy controls will be calculated based on the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) research criteria for prodromal Parkinson's disease.
Baseline and 7 year
Conversion rate of iRBD to neurodegenerative diseases in patients with high and low likelihood ratio of probability of prodromal Parkinson's disease in each individual
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 7 year follow up
Conversion rate of iRBD to neurodegenerative diseases in patients with high and low likelihood ratio of probability at baseline, the level of likelihood ratio was defined based on the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) research criteria for prodromal Parkinson's disease.
Changes from baseline to 7 year follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Yaping Liu, PhD, Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Study Director: Siu Ping Lam, MBChB, Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Study Director: Shirley Xin Li, PhD, The University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 15, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 31, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Researcher in other sleep centers are also conducting similar study, there may be a plan for further collaboration on sharing the database

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on REM Sleep Behavior Disorder

3
Subscribe