CTC Changes and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-negative Breast Cancer

January 19, 2022 updated by: Jianyi Li, Shengjing Hospital

Circulating Tumor Cell Changes and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-negative Breast Cancer: a Cohort Trial

Chemotherapy before operation for malignant tumors can reduce the size of tumors to a certain extent, even eliminate micrometastases. Chemotherapy can also detect the sensitivity of chemotherapeutic drugs and create opportunities for breast-conserving or surgical treatment for patients. This may lead to high survival opportunities for triple-negative breast cancer patients who are not sensitive to targeted therapy or endocrine therapy. However, during neoadjuvant therapy, CT or MRI tests are needed to monitor the patient's condition. Therefore, if there is any deterioration, to consider changing the treatment regimen or immediately carrying out surgery is necessary. However, because of the need for multiple imaging examinations during neoadjuvant therapy, which will increase medical costs, to explore a cheaper examination method is necessary . Circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood are derived from the shedding of breast cancer lesions. Detection of these circulating tumor cells may monitor the therapeutic effect on breast cancer, and the cost of detecting circulating tumor cells is much lower than that of conventional PET-CT, which can obviously reduce the medical costs of patients. However, there is no clinical study on the changes of circulating tumor cells and the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer in and outside China.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Triple-negative breast cancer refers to breast cancer with negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor. Triple-negative breast cancer has poor differentiation, high invasiveness and high recurrence rate, accounting for 15.0%-23.8% of breast cancer. Due to the phenotypic specificity of triple-negative breast cancer, both targeted therapy and endocrine therapy are insensitive, making chemotherapy an important part in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.

In 1982, Frei proposed the concept of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which is to apply chemotherapy before surgery for malignant tumors. Chemotherapy can reduce the size of tumors to some extent, even eliminate micrometastases, detect the sensitivity of chemotherapy drugs, and create opportunities for patients to have breast-conserving or surgical treatment. For triple-negative breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with synchronous combination of anthracyclines and taxanes or intensive sequential combination of anthracyclines and taxanes is the first choice. Simultaneously, chemotherapeutic drugs such as platinum, albumin, and paclitaxel as well as poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors can be added according to the patient's condition. However, during neoadjuvant therapy, a CT or MRI test is needed to monitor the patient's condition, so if there is any deterioration, to consider changing the treatment plan or immediately performing surgery is necessary. However, because of the need for multiple imaging examinations during neoadjuvant therapy, which increases the medical costs, to explore a low cost inspection method is necessary.

Circulating tumor cells are a new type of tumor molecular marker. Circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood originate from breast cancer (primary and metastatic lesions) shedding. Detection of these circulating tumor cells may monitor the therapeutic effect on breast cancer. The cost of detecting circulating tumor cells is much lower than that of conventional PET-CT, which can noticeably reduce medical expenses of patients. However, there is no clinical study on the changes of circulating tumor cells and the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer in and outside China. This study aims to explore the correlation between the changes of circulating tumor cells and the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer, and to compare the time intervals between the changes of circulating tumor cells and the changes of efficacy in patients with different sensitivities of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, so as to provide experimental evidence for predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy by observing the changes of circulating tumor cells in clinic.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Liaoning
      • Shengyang, Liaoning, China, 110042
        • Recruiting
        • Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 110004
        • Recruiting
        • Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Totally 200 patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be consecutively enrolled in the trial and grouped according to their sensitivity.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • triple-negative breast cancer confirmed by breast biopsy;
  • stage III breast cancer (IIIA-C) assessed by CT or MRI;
  • neoadjuvant chemotherapy;
  • informed consent of patients and their family members.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • use of second-line chemotherapy regimen;
  • bilateral breast cancer;
  • inflammatory breast cancer;
  • pregnant or breast-feeding;
  • distant metastasis;
  • a history of other cancers or chest radiotherapy;
  • a history of abnormal blood test or other infectious symptoms.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Sensitivity group
100 patients will be assigned into sensitivity group according to the actual situation of them.
Taxanes or/and anthracycline-based therapy will be used in this group. That is, intravenous injection of 90 mg/m2 epirubicin (trade name: Pharmorubicin, Pfizer, Shanghai, China; drug approval number: H20100155) + 135 mg/m2 paclitaxel liposome (trade name: Taxotere, Sanofi (Hangzhou) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China; drug approval number: J20090104), every 3 weeks as a course of treatment. The efficacy will be evaluated every 2 courses. After the 6th course, mastectomy will be performed according to the patient's conditions.
Drug resistance group
100 patients will be assigned into drug resistance according to the actual situation of them.
Taxanes or/and anthracycline-based therapy will be used in this group. That is, intravenous injection of 90 mg/m2 epirubicin (trade name: Pharmorubicin, Pfizer, Shanghai, China; drug approval number: H20100155) + 135 mg/m2 paclitaxel liposome (trade name: Taxotere, Sanofi (Hangzhou) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China; drug approval number: J20090104), every 3 weeks as a course of treatment. The efficacy will be evaluated every 2 courses. After the 6th course, mastectomy will be performed according to the patient's conditions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Time Frame: At 18 weeks
The efficacy will be evaluated by the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) score, which is based on CT or X-ray results. (1) Complete response (CR): disappearance of all lesions; (2) partial response (PR): 30% decrease in sum of all target lesions in longest axis measurement; (3) stable disease (SD): the sum of the longest diameter of all lesions decreases but does not reach PR or increases but does not reach PD; (4) progressive disease (PD): 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter or appearance of new lesions. SD: One or more non-target lesions and/or tumor markers are higher than normal and persistent.
At 18 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Time Frame: At 6 and 12 weeks
The efficacy will be evaluated by the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) score, which is based on CT or X-ray results. (1) Complete response (CR): disappearance of all lesions; (2) partial response (PR): 30% decrease in sum of all target lesions in longest axis measurement; (3) stable disease (SD): the sum of the longest diameter of all lesions decreases but does not reach PR or increases but does not reach PD; (4) progressive disease (PD): 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter or appearance of new lesions. SD: One or more non-target lesions and/or tumor markers are higher than normal and persistent.
At 6 and 12 weeks
Detection of circulating tumor cells
Time Frame: At 3 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
At 3 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 2.5 ml of blood will be taken from median elbow vein of upper arm, and the number of circulating tumor cells is ≤ 2 or CD133 ≤ 1.
At 3 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Miller-Payne grading score
Time Frame: Before and 18 weeks after chemotherapy
The Miller-Payne grading system is as follows: Grade 1: no reduction in overall cellularity; grade 2: up to 30% reduction of cellularity; grade 3: between an estimated 30% and 90% reduction in tumor cellularity; grade 4: a marked disappearance of more than 90% of tumor cells; grade 5: no invasive malignant cells identifiable in sections from the site of the tumor, but ductal carcinoma in situ may be present.
Before and 18 weeks after chemotherapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 31, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 20, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Taxanes or/and anthracycline-based therapy

Subscribe