Neurophysiological, Behavioral, and Cognitive Networks in Movement Disorders

November 1, 2023 updated by: J. Nicole Bentley, University of Alabama at Birmingham
The purpose of this study is to investigate the brain activity associated with motor and non-motor symptoms of movement disorders, including Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor. These movement disorders commonly have significant non-motor features, such as depression, cognitive and memory impairment, decreased attention, speech and language disturbances, and slower processing speeds. The investigators are interested in the brain activity associated with these motor and non-motor symptoms, and propose to investigate changes in brain activity while the investigators perform recordings of the surface and deep structures of the brain, in addition to the typical recordings the investigators perform, during routine deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Movement disorders are a prominent cause of disability worldwide. In the United States, it is estimated that more than 4 million people suffer from Parkinson's disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), and dystonia, making them some of the most prevalent of neurologic disorders. Of these, PD is the most common, and is primarily characterized by tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia. However, though primarily characterized by motor symptoms, many patients also have prominent non-motor features, including depression and cognitive impairment, with deficiencies in processing speed, memory, attention, and learning. Some of the most debilitating cognitive deficiencies include deficits in goal-directed response selection and response inhibition, language, and/or speech difficulties, all of which substantially contribute to reduced quality of life.

Unfortunately, these features of movement disorders are less well-studied and lack effective treatment options, necessitating that new treatments be investigated. Deep brain stimulation (DBS), while a highly effective treatment for the cardinal features of PD, is essentially ineffective for, and can even worsen other cognitive domains, and there are few studies currently investigating how different parameters of DBS may improve these symptoms. In addition, speech abnormalities are common with Parkinson's disease and DBS can sometimes worsen speech problems. These impairments consists primarily of hypophonia, but cognitive deficits can result in actual language disturbance. It is often difficult to know whether the speech problems are related to language processing or articulation (related to the movement disorder). In an effort to begin addressing these questions, we propose to study motor and non-motor symptoms in patients with movement disorders, and to correlate movement and cognition with underlying neural electrophysiology.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • Recruiting
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible for DBS surgery based on multi-disciplinary consensus review
  • Have a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease or Essential Tremor
  • A minimum of 18 years of age
  • Willingness to participate in the paradigms described in the protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide full and informed consent
  • Are not surgical candidates due to co-morbid conditions or pregnancy
  • Have not undergone an adequate trial of conservative medical management
  • Have a clinical presentation for which DBS surgery is not indicated
  • Are not able to participate in study-related activities

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment
Parkinson's Disease Patients receiving DBS electrodes
After creation of the burr hole and prior to DBS electrode placement, 1-2 subdural strip electrodes will be placed anteriorly or posteriorly from the cranial opening. These electrodes are routinely placed using this technique for seizure mapping, with arrays of electrodes (up to 6) being placed around the perimeter of the opening.14 Subdural strips vary in length and contact size (e.g., the 6-contact Ad-Tech strip), and are currently placed predominantly for studies of sensorimotor function,13 including at our institution (IRB-140327003). Placement over prefrontal areas is performed at other institutions.11-13 The DBS surgery will then proceed according to routine practice, and following lead placement in the optimal desired location, the research task paradigm will begin.
No Intervention: Control
Control subjects will be non-Parkinson's Disease patients with essential tremor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy via Simon Task (% correct)
Time Frame: Baseline

In the Simon task, participants are instructed to respond with a right or left button press (Right = Red, Left = Blue) according to how a word is printed on a screen ("RED" or "BLUE"), regardless of the color in which the word is printed.

This is a measurement of accuracy (% correct, ranging from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better performance)

Baseline
Response times via Simon Task (sec)
Time Frame: Baseline

In the Simon task, participants are instructed to respond with a right or left button press according to the word "RIGHT" or "LEFT" that appears on a screen, regardless of where on the screen it actually appears.

This is a measurement response times (continuous measure, from 0-4000 milliseconds) between correct and incorrect responses.

Baseline
Simon Effect on Response times (sec)
Time Frame: Baseline
Participants will perform the Simon task as described, and the Simon effect will be calculated as the difference in response times between congruent and incongruent trials
Baseline
Simon Effect on Accuracy (% correct)
Time Frame: Baseline
Participants will perform the Simon task as described, and the Simon effect will be calculated as the difference in accuracy between congruent and incongruent trials
Baseline
UPDRS 3 motor score (0-108)
Time Frame: Baseline
Participants will undergo motor evaluation using the validated United Parkinson's disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part 3
Baseline
Dementia Rating Scale Score (0-144 points)
Time Frame: Baseline
Participants will undergo neuropsychological testing as part of routine care, including the Dementia Rating Scale
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy via Simon Task (% correct)
Time Frame: 6 months

In the Simon task, participants are instructed to respond with a right or left button press (Right = Red, Left = Blue) according to how a word is printed on a screen ("RED" or "BLUE"), regardless of the color in which the word is printed.

This is a measurement of accuracy (% correct, ranging from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better performance)

6 months
Response times via Simon Task (sec)
Time Frame: 6 months

In the Simon task, participants are instructed to respond with a right or left button press according to the word "RIGHT" or "LEFT" that appears on a screen, regardless of where on the screen it actually appears.

This is a measurement response times (continuous measure, from 0-4000 milliseconds) between correct and incorrect responses.

6 months
Simon Effect on Response times (sec)
Time Frame: 6 months
Participants will perform the Simon task as described, and the Simon effect will be calculated as the difference in response times between congruent and incongruent trials
6 months
Simon Effect on Accuracy (% correct)
Time Frame: 6 months
Participants will perform the Simon task as described, and the Simon effect will be calculated as the difference in accuracy between congruent and incongruent trials
6 months
UPDRS 3 motor score (0-108)
Time Frame: 6 months
Participants will undergo motor evaluation using the validated United Parkinson's disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part 3
6 months
Comparison of hemispheric differences in power spectral density (p-value, parametric two-tailed t-test)
Time Frame: 0-3 months
We will compare changes in right and left-hemispheric power spectral density
0-3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation of prefrontal power spectra between outpatient EEG and intraoperative ECOG (correlation coefficient)
Time Frame: 0-6 months
Participants will perform the Simon task during pre- and post-operative study visits. Power spectra will be compared to intraoperative power spectra.
0-6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nicole Bentley, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB-300003605

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Movement Disorders

Clinical Trials on Response Inhibition and Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's disease

3
Subscribe