Physiotherapy in Lumbar Disc Pathologies

February 2, 2021 updated by: GUL BALTACI, Guven Health Group

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of four physical therapy treatment approaches for lumbar region pathologies. Eighty volunteers who have back pain will be included in the study. Subjects will be randomly divided into four groups; Group 1: Soft tissue mobilisation techniques and stabilization exercises (n=20), Group 2: Kinesiotape and stabilization exercise (n=20), Group 3: Stabilization exercises (n=20), Group 4: Reflexology and stabilization exercises (n=20).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All patients will be measured with visual analog scale for pain level, goniometric measurement for range of motion, hamstring tension and sit and reach for flexibility, isokinetic evaluation for strength in 60degree/ sec, Side plank position test for trunk stabilization.

Function will be measured with Oswestry Disability Index. Manual muscle testing for flexion, extension, lateral flexion of back, flexion, extension, abduction of hip, flexion, extension of knee and inversion, eversion of ankle will be assessed. Group 1, 2 and 4 will be started to treatment twice a week for 4 weeks after first evaluation. Group 3 will be had home exercise programme after first evaluation.

Groups will be assessed again at 4th and 8th weeks after treatment. Multiway variant analysis will bee done within each group before the treatment and at follow-up. When differences observed, Tukey test will be used to find out the group that caused the differences.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06770
        • Anima Rapha Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 55 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The participants between the ages of 25 and 55 years,
  • Having a minimum pain level (at activity) of 3 out of 10 on visual analog scale
  • Having low back pain for at least 3 months with lumbar disc pathology (bulging or protrusion) diagnosed by clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging.

Exclusion criteria:

  • sacroiliac and lumbar degenerative pathologies,
  • another pathology related to neurological deficits,
  • physiotherapy previously received for at least 12 months,
  • any surgery affecting the lumbar region.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: FACTORIAL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Soft tissue mobilization&stabilization exercises

The following manual therapy techniques will be applied:

  1. Soft Tissue Mobilization;
  2. Pretzel Maneuvers;
  3. Pelvis Backward-Distraction;
  4. Trunk Rotation;
  5. Multifidus Mobilization; and
  6. Piriformis Transverse Friction Massage
Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain intensity, goniometric measurements for the range of motion and hamstring flexibility, the sit and reach test for flexibility, an isokinetic evaluation for strength at 60°/sec, and a side-plank position test for trunk stabilization were measured. The functional status was evaluated with the Oswestry Disability Index. All groups were assessed at the beginning, after a four-week treatment and four weeks of follow-up.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Kinesiotape&stabilization exercises
The Kinesio® Taping muscle technique, with 10-25% of the stretch of the tape, will be applied to the sacrospinalis, quadratus lumborum, gluteus medius/maximus and piriformis muscles, based on the the weakness that patient's muscles had. Factors interfering with tape adhesion, such as sweat or hair, will be removed before the application. The tape can stay in place for 3-5 days due to its water resistant and breathable properties
Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain intensity, goniometric measurements for the range of motion and hamstring flexibility, the sit and reach test for flexibility, an isokinetic evaluation for strength at 60°/sec, and a side-plank position test for trunk stabilization were measured. The functional status was evaluated with the Oswestry Disability Index. All groups were assessed at the beginning, after a four-week treatment and four weeks of follow-up.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Stabilization exercises
The core stabilization exercise treatment program consisted of the following exercises: a posterior pelvic tilt exercise, lower abdominal muscle isometric strengthening, hip adductor muscle isometric strengthening, lumbar stabilization exercises with a Swiss ball, upper and lower abdominal muscle strengthening exercises with a Swiss ball, oblique abdominal muscle strengthening exercises with a Swiss ball, quadratus lumborum muscle stretching with a Swiss ball, back extensor muscle strengthening exercises with a Swiss ball, a slump exercise (sciatic nerve stretching), lumbar lordosis exercises with a Swiss ball, bridge exercises with a Swiss ball, single leg bridge exercises on a Swiss ball, posture exercises, push-up exercises with a Swiss ball, and squat exercises with a Swiss ball
Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain intensity, goniometric measurements for the range of motion and hamstring flexibility, the sit and reach test for flexibility, an isokinetic evaluation for strength at 60°/sec, and a side-plank position test for trunk stabilization were measured. The functional status was evaluated with the Oswestry Disability Index. All groups were assessed at the beginning, after a four-week treatment and four weeks of follow-up.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Reflex therapy&Stabilization exercises
Mobilization of each vertebra and pulls were applied from the medial side of the toe to the medial malleolus and to the heel by hand or with the help of an apparatus, including the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine reflex zones. Finally, the procedure was finished by making a V-shaped maneuver with a thumb in the direction of spinal nerve exits.
Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain intensity, goniometric measurements for the range of motion and hamstring flexibility, the sit and reach test for flexibility, an isokinetic evaluation for strength at 60°/sec, and a side-plank position test for trunk stabilization were measured. The functional status was evaluated with the Oswestry Disability Index. All groups were assessed at the beginning, after a four-week treatment and four weeks of follow-up.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain intensity
Time Frame: 8weeks
All patients will be assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity at rest, at night and during activity. VAS is a 100-mm line with no marks along it, anchored with the words "no pain" on one side and "the most severe pain" on the other. The subjects were simply instructed to place a mark along the line at a level representing the intensity of their pain.
8weeks
range of motion
Time Frame: 8weeks
Trunk and hip range of motion measurements were taken with a universal goniometer. Active trunk flexion and extension, lateral flexion, and hip flexion and extension will recorded. Hamstring flexibility will be also measured with universal goniometry using the passive 90/90 test. For this test, the patients will be positioned supine, lying on the back, with the knee and hip stabilized at 90° of flexion. The goniometer will be pivoted at the lateral condyle of the femur, and knee extension will be measured in order to determine the loss of the range of motion due to hamstring tightness.
8weeks
muscular strength
Time Frame: 8weeks
All patients were assessed with isokinetic testing for strength at 60°/sec. Isokinetic testing is commonly used for testing and training of patients in clinics. It calculates the muscle power at the full range of motion, providing the opportunity to act at the angular velocity. An IsoMed 2000 (D&R GmbH, Germany) will be used bilaterally for isokinetic evaluation of hip flexion and abduction at 60°/sec. After proper positioning, the patient will be asked to push the force arm of the system as strongly as possible at this angular velocity in the flexion and abduction directions. The peak torque and total work values will be recorded.
8weeks
Trunk stabilization test
Time Frame: 8weeks
A side-plank position test was used for evaluation of trunk stabilization. The test is one of the most functional stabilization tests and examines trunk strength, endurance and stabilization during synchronized extremity movements. Basically, the lateral core muscles are assessed but oblique abdominal muscles and hip flexors are also examined. Patients are positioned in side lying, with 90° elbow flexion, 60° shoulder abduction, legs extended and whole body aligned. After trial repetition, patients are asked to raise their pelvis off the ground and stay in that position as long as possible without disrupting the smoothness of the motion. The test is finished when the position is disrupted or the patient falls.
8weeks
Functional performance
Time Frame: 1hour
The functional status will be evaluated with the Oswestry Disability Index. Knowing the symptoms and disabilities of low back pain patients gives us valuable information for planning the treatment process. The Oswestry Disability Index has 10 main topics, namely, pain intensity, self-care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleep quality, sexual function, social life, and traveling. Each section is scored from 0 to 5 points. The degree of disability increases as the score increases.
1hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 2, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 2, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 2, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Disc Herniation

Subscribe