Minimally Invasive Calcaneal Fracture Fixation vs Standard Lateral Approach

April 13, 2024 updated by: peter mamdouh shehata, Assiut University

Minimally Invasive Calcaneal Fixation Via Sinus Tarsi Approach Vs Standard Lateral Extensile Approach in Calcaneal Fracture ( Randomized Controlled Trial )

a comparison between the standard lateral extensile approach and minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach in this research.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Calcaneal fracture occurred in about 2% of patients; they represented almost 60% of all tarsal fractures.

Calcaneal fractures are caused by high velocity Force to the heel, mostly vehicle accident or fall from height. There are many factors affect the fracture pattern: age of the patient, weight , type of fall . Male patients predominated (75%) and younger than 50 years. In most cases, these fractures are bilateral and conjoined with lumbar spine fractures.

According to the result of computed tomography (CT) scanning. The calcaneal fractures can be classified into 4 categories, among which the SANDERS TYPE Ⅱ and Ⅲ fractures are the most common types.2 Thus the development of effective and safe treatment strategies for these two fracture types has always been an issue among orthopedic surgeons.

The treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures has always been controversial. Currently open reduction and internal fixation through L-Shape extensile incision has been considered as the gold standard surgical therapy for calcaneal fractures. This approach provide a large view to expose the fracture, allowing accurate reduction of the deformed posterior facet and convenient placement of the plate to achieve stable fixation. Postoperatively, plaster cast is worn for 2 weeks, walking with the crutches for additional 8-12 weeks is prescribed, and return to work is achieved after 6-9 months. However, the high incidence (approximately 30%) of complications associated with this approach, including wound dehiscence and deep infection , remain a non-negligible problem .

To lower the wound complications , a minimally invasive approaches has been introduced such as percutaneously applied distraction systems K-wires or screw fixation of intra-articular fractures , the use of elizarov device , percutaneous arthroscopy assisted osteosynthesis and Sinus Tarsi approaches . The sinus tarsi approach has become one of the most frequently applied minimally invasive approaches because of its ability to provide adequate exposure for the posterior facet, the anterolateral fragment and the lateral wall. Wound complication rate with this approach have been reported to range from 0% to 15.4% . Nevertheless, the poor visualization of the lateral wall of the calcaneus through this small incision makes it difficult to insert the conventional plate for obtaining a stable fixation. Thus, the development of a plate that is adaptable to the anatomic characteristics of the calcaneus and sinus tarsi approach is important.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

225

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt
        • AssiutU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. patients with calcaneal fractures according to Sanders classification, are Sanders type II or type III.
  2. closed calcaneal fractures

Exclusion Criteria:

- 1)patients with calcaneal fractures classification according to sanders classification , are sanders type I or IV 2)patients who have systemic comorbidity as( cardic ,diabetec ,cirrhotic patients, etc.) or smokers or local lesion as (blisters,vasculopathy , swelling etc.).

3) open calcaneal fractures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: lateral extensile approach in calcaneal fractures fixation
Lateral extensile approach is the standard approach for intra-articular calcaneal fractures .
The standard extended lateral approach with L-shaped incision was made in this group, which originated vertically from 5 cm over lateral malleolus or the midpoint between the fibula and Achilles tendon and ended on the base of the fifth metatarsal . The incision is made directly to the bone at the corner to create a full-thickness flap. Attention must be paid to protect the sural nerve and peroneal tendons as well.
Experimental: minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach in calc.fixation
Sinus tarsi approach become one of the most frequently applied minimally invasive approaches.
An incision is made from the tip of the lateral malleolus toward the base of the fourth metatarsal bone. The incision lies in a plane between the superficial peroneal nerve and the sural nerve. Care is taken to bluntly dissect after the skin incision to protect the sural nerve or branches of the superficial peroneal nerve. By mobilizing the sinus tarsi fat pad dorsally, the incision was deepened. The extensor digitorum brevis muscle is sharply elevated off of the anterior process with the lateral root of the inferior extensor retinaculum and reflected dorsally and distally. The peroneus brevis and peroneus longus tendons are split, allowing exposure to the sinus tarsi and visualization of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AOFAS( American association of foot and ankle score )for hind foot
Time Frame: baseline
american association foot and ankle score
baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiological bohler angle
Time Frame: baseline
restoration of bohler of hind foot
baseline
Wound complications
Time Frame: baseline
wound dehiscence, infection, etc
baseline
Union rate
Time Frame: baseline
the percentage of union in each arm
baseline
Time needed before full weight bearing ( from 3 to 6 month )
Time Frame: baseline
the time the patient take for full weight bearing , usually take from 3 to 6 months in each arm
baseline
Radiological gissane angle
Time Frame: Baseline
Restoration of gissane angle of hind foot
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: wael Y Eladly, professor, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • calcaneal fractures

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Calcaneus Fracture

Clinical Trials on Lateral extensile approach in calcaneal fractures fixation

Subscribe