Correlation of Intravascular Injection Rate and Severity of Cervical Neural Foraminal Stenosis

September 5, 2019 updated by: Saeyoung Kim, MD, PhD, Kyungpook National University Hospital

Correlation of Intravascular Injection Rate and Severity of Cervical Neural Foraminal Stenosis During Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection: a Prospective Study

This study evaluates whether there is a correlation between intravascular injection rate and severity of cervical foraminal stenosis during cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection (CTFESI) is useful option to improve cervical radicular pain. However, severe complication can occur by CTFESI such as epidural hematomas, infection, inadvertent intramedullary cord injections, and embolic infarct when inadvertent intra-arterial injection of particulate steroids has occurred.

The incidence of intravascular injection during CTFESI was known as 20.6% ~ 32.8% and it is higher than other level of spinal transforaminal epidural injection.

To avoid complication due to intravascular injection during CTFESI, risk factors was should be evaluated. However, there was no study about risk factors of intravascular injection during CTFESI. The investigators could assume the severity of cervical neural foraminal spinal stenosis could affect the incidence of intravascular injection, pain intensity and effectiveness during CTFESI.

Thus, the investigators designed this study to investigate whether there is a correlation between intravascular injection rate and severity of cervical foraminal stenosis during CTFESI.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

126

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of, 700-412
        • Recruiting
        • Kyungpook National University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with radiating pain from cervical spinal stenosis and herniated nucleus pulposus.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy, allergic to contrast media, patient refusal, and patients with persistent contraindication to nerve block such as coagulopathy and infection of the injection site.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SCREENING
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Moderate stenosis
Moderate cervical neural foraminal stenosis is narrowest width of the neural foramen was >50% of the width of the width of the extraforaminal nerve root at the level of the anterior margin of the superior articular process.
Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection is a useful option in the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radicular pain.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Severe stenosis
Severe cervical neural foraminal stenosis is narrowest width of the neural foramen was ≤50% of the extraforaminal nerve root width
Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection is a useful option in the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radicular pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intravascular injection
Time Frame: During procedure
Intravascular injection is defined as contrast media spreading out through the vascular channel during injection of contrast media under real time fluoroscopy
During procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Before treatment and at 1 month after treatment
Pain intensity will be evaluated using a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Before treatment and at 1 month after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 31, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 9, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-06-009-001

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Analgesia, Epidural

Clinical Trials on Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection

3
Subscribe