Pulsatile Pressure Waveform to Confirm Correct Placement of the Epidural in Laboring Patients

February 24, 2016 updated by: Ilana Sebbag, Lawson Health Research Institute

Efficacy of the Presence of a Pulsatile Pressure Waveform to Confirm Correct Placement of the Epidural Needle and Catheter in Laboring Pregnant Patients: a Feasibility Study

Epidural analgesia is highly effective for labor pain relief and is widely chosen by pregnant patients. However, placement of the epidural needle can be challenging in pregnant patients due to lax tissue ligaments and edema so that the traditional loss of resistance method (LOR) used to find the space may be subtle leading to retries which may delay onset of analgesia as well as increase the risk of complications. The ability to transduce a pulsatile pressure waveform from epidural needles placed in non-laboring patients correlates highly with successful placement of the epidural needle. We wish to evaluate the efficacy of obtaining a pulsatile pressure waveform with correct epidural needle placement in laboring women.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

Patients requesting epidural labor analgesia will be eligible for recruitment. After written informed consent is obtained, placement of monitors and aseptic technique, the 17G epidural needle will be placed using the loss of resistance (LOR) technique to air or saline at the lumbar level chosen by the anesthesiologist. When LOR occurs, the needle will then be filled with 2 mL NaCl 0.9% from that syringe and the pressure monitoring accessory will be connected to the needle. The second investigator will then connect the high pressure tubing to the acessory without touching it, and the pressure will be zeroed at level of the needle insertion. Pressure will then be transduced and the waveform, recorded. An epidural catheter (SIMS Portex) will then be passed through the needle and advanced 5 cm beyond the tip of the epidural needle. After securing the epidural catheter in place, the patient will be placed on the lateral position. The catheter will then be filled NaCl 0.9% from a syringe and a high-pressure tubing extension leveled at the spine level will be connected to the catheter and the pressure will be transduced and recorded. Data recorded will include 2 parameters: 1) The presence or absence of a pulsatile waveform, and 2) The actual pressure read at the epidural space, in mmHg. Those readings will be obtained in 2 distinct moments: at a " rest" state, meaning during an interval between contractions, and at an "active" state, during the first contraction after the epidural catheter is placed. A test dose of 3 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine1:200.000 will then be given to exclude potential spinal or intravascular injection. After 3 minutes, a loading dose of 10mL of 0,125% bupivacaine will be given for labor analgesia and the presence or absence of a bilateral sensorial block at T10 or higher at 30 min will be assessed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5
        • Victoria Hospital- LHSC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female Patients
  • ASA I-III
  • Term Pregnancy (>37 weeks)
  • 18 years or older
  • Early Labour (<6 cm of cervical dilation)
  • BMI<40

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any contraindication to epidural analgesia placement (coagulopathy, sepsis, infection at site, increased ICP, hypovolemia, unstable ischemic heart disease, unstable neurologic disease, severe aortic stenosis, prior spinal surgery, LA allergy)
  • Serious concern for maternal or fetal wellfare.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Epidural Pressure Waveform

Study Population:

  • Term pregnancy
  • in labour
  • 18 years of age or older.
When loss of resistance occurs, a high-pressure tubing extension will be connected to the needle and the pressure will be transduced and the waveform, recorded. An epidural catheter will then be passed through the needle and connected to a high-pressure tubing extension and the pressure will be transduced and recorded. A test dose of 3 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:200.000 will then be given to exclude potential spinal or intravascular injection. After 3 minutes, a loading dose of 10 mL of 0,125% bupivacaine will be given for labor analgesia and the presence or absence of a bilateral sensorial block at T10 or higher at 30 min will be assessed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Epidural Needle Insertion Success
Time Frame: 30 min after loading dose
Presence of a pulsatile pressure waveform at the epidural needle as a good predictor of a successful epidural block 30 min after local anesthetic injection
30 min after loading dose

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Epidural Pressure in mmHg
Time Frame: 5 min after epidural needle insertion
Epidural pressures during uterine contractions and in-between contractions in mmHg
5 min after epidural needle insertion
Epidural Waveform at the Catheter
Time Frame: Immediately after epidural catheter insertion
Presence or absence of an epidural waveform measured through the epidural catheter right after insertion
Immediately after epidural catheter insertion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Indu Singh, MD, FRCPC, University of Western Ontario, Schulich School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 25, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 106323

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Analgesia, Epidural

Clinical Trials on Epidural Pressure Waveform

3
Subscribe