Pre-therapeutic MRI Assessment of Early Stage Rectal Cancer and Significant Rectal Polyps to Avoid Major Resectional Surgery: A New Approach to the Management of Early Stage Rectal Cancer. (PRESERVE)

September 23, 2019 updated by: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
This multicentre, prospective, randomised, feasibility trial aims to change UK practice by enabling more patients with early rectal cancer to safely undergo local excision rather than major surgery thus maintaining quality of life without compromising survival outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The national bowel cancer screening programme (BCSP) has shown an increase in detection rates of early rectal cancer (ERC). This is treated effectively with radical surgery, offering excellent oncological outcome, but has a major impact on patient quality of life. The diagnosis of early stage rectal cancer, allows an opportunity for effective oncological treatment, with preservation of the rectum avoiding the deleterious effects of unselective use of radical surgery and unselected use of radiotherapy. Our previous work has led to High-Spatial-Resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the established modality for providing reliable information about extramural disease prior to radical surgery.

This trial will use a new MRI staging protocol to identify more patients with early rectal cancer to enable accurate mapping for more precise patient selection for local excision. Improved success with local excision will result in greater rates of organ preservation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

146

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • mrT3b tumour or less on initial assessment
  • Absence of mrEMVI / mrN1c deposits
  • mrCRM clear >1mm
  • Rectal lesion as defined on MRI/Endoscopy. (If patients are registered at endoscopy and later found, on MRI, not to have a rectal ERC, they should be withdrawn from the study)
  • Over 18 years of age
  • Of adequate performance status to be able to undergo surgery if necessary

Exclusion Criteria:

  • are requiring neoadjuvant therapy for MRI-staged advanced rectal cancer
  • have metastatic disease
  • have a second malignancy where there is <95% certainty of survival from the treated disease
  • are unable to consent or withhold consent
  • have biopsy-proven malignancy which is not adenocarcinoma (Patients do not need to have had a biopsy prior to registration. However, if after excision the ERC is found to either not be an adenocarcinoma or be benign, the patient should be withdrawn from the study.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Low risk
MR Staged >1mm muscularis preserved and technically feasible to perform local excision. Pathology assessment on sample with confirmation of adenocarcinoma. Sample assessed to be low risk based on PRESERVE Risk Score of 0. (Margin Clear >0mm from the diathermy margin and Sm1/2 or Haggitt 1/2/3) Six monthly follow up from date of surgery.
6 monthly surveillance
Active Comparator: Moderate Risk - RT&Surveillance
MR Staged >1mm muscularis preserved and technically feasible to perform local excision. Pathology assessment on sample with confirmation of adenocarcinoma. Sample assessed to be low risk based on PRESERVE Risk Score of 1. (Margin positive -0mm to the diathermy margin, or SM3 or Haggitt 4, or LVI) Patient randomized to receive radiotherapy (RT) and regular surveillance, with 3 monthly follow-up from the date of surgery.
as per local policy
Active Comparator: Moderate Risk - Surveillance
MR Staged >1mm muscularis preserved and technically feasible to perform local excision. Pathology assessment on sample with confirmation of adenocarcinoma. Sample assessed to be low risk based on PRESERVE Risk Score of 1. (Margin positive -0mm to the diathermy margin, or SM3 or Haggitt 4, or LVI) Patient randomized to surveillance arm with regular surveillance, with 3 monthly follow-up from the date of surgery.
3 monthly surveillance
Active Comparator: High Risk
MR Staged >1mm muscularis preserved and technically feasible to perform local excision. Pathology assessment on sample with confirmation of adenocarcinoma. Sample assessed to be low risk based on PRESERVE Risk Score of >2. (Margin positive - 0mm to the diathermy margin, Margin positive/or unassessable due to piecemeal removal - 0mm to the tumour margin, Sm3 or Haggitt 4, Poorly differentiated/mucinous, LVI, T2) Patient is considered for surgery, receives radiotherapy and surveillance, with 3 monthly follow-up from date of surgery.
as per local policy
Active Comparator: TME (Total mesorectal excision) Surgery
For patients where it is considered technically feasible to do LE but MR staged<1mm muscularis preserved, or it is considered not feasible to perform a local excision. Patients undergo TME surgery. Pathology assessment on sample with confirmation of adenocarcinoma. Patient receives 6 monthly follow-up from date of surgery.
6 monthly surveillance

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demonstrate a change in rectal preservation rates
Time Frame: 36 months
Demonstrate a change in rectal preservation rates in patients with pT1 and pT2 tumours.
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To measure the accuracy of MRI T staging when compared with pathology.
Time Frame: 36 months
To measure the accuracy of MRI T staging when compared with pathology.
36 months
Rates of missed lesions for local excision
Time Frame: 36 months
Report on rates of missed lesions suitable for local excision.
36 months
Rates of lesions not for local excision
Time Frame: 36 months
Report on rates of lesions not feasible for local excision
36 months
Cost comparison
Time Frame: 36 months
Compare costs to the NHS/other healthcare systems of major surgery versus local excision for pT1/T2 ERC.
36 months
Measure impact on patient quality of life
Time Frame: 36 months
Measure impacts of local excision and rectal preservation on patient reported quality of life outcome measures compared with stage matched patients undergoing major surgery due to patient choice or technical inability to undertake locale scission. Measurement tools used for assessment are the LARS (low anterior resection syndrome) score, the EQ-5D and Stoma Care Quality of Life Questionnaire.
36 months
Measure relapse-free rates at 1 year post surgery / local excision.
Time Frame: 36 months
Put in a separate point saying: Measure survival rates at 1 year post surgery / local excision.
36 months
Assess the quality of local excision surgery
Time Frame: 36 months
To assess the quality of local excision surgery, using review of pathology slides and reports, commenting on completeness of excision, excision margins and en bloc manner of resection (local excision specimens).
36 months
Assess patient willingness to be randomised
Time Frame: 36 months
Assess patient willingness to be randomised by qualitative questionnaire
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2032

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2032

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Surveillance 6 monthly

3
Subscribe