Self-Management in Parents of Technology-Dependent Children

Resourcefulness Intervention to Promote Self-Management in Parents of Technology-Dependent Children

Parent caregivers of children with chronic conditions who require life-saving technology such as mechanical ventilation or feeding tubes must maintain a high level of vigilance 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. They usually provide a majority of their children's care and are often overwhelmed by the caregiving demands thus neglect health promotion behaviors that result in a deterioration of their own mental and physical health. The goal of this study is to test a cognitive-behavioral resourcefulness intervention that will improve these caregivers' mental and physical health and health promotion behaviors while they continue to provide vital care for these vulnerable children.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Parents; Caregivers; Self-Management; Chronic Illnesses, Multiple
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Resourcefulness Training©

Detailed Description

Parent caregivers of children who require life-saving technology such as mechanical ventilation or feeding tubes must maintain a high level of vigilance 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. They report greater levels of stress, compromised self-management behaviors and poorer psychological and physical health than other caregiver groups which dramatically increases their mortality risk. Technology-dependent children (approximately 600,000) are among the sickest and most vulnerable subset of children with complex chronic conditions in the United States. They comprise 20% of all children discharged from the hospital to home, yet account for 61% of healthcare spending for children, up to $110 billion annually. Despite the adverse consequences for caregivers, there are no interventions to meet their specific needs. Resourcefulness Training, (cognitive-behavioral self-management intervention) has been shown to improve psychological and physical outcomes, mediate the effects of stress, and enhance the care provided to care-recipients. A Resourcefulness Training Intervention (RTI) will be tested in a randomized trial against an attention control group. The RTI includes face-to-face session for teaching social (help-seeking) and personal (self-help) resourcefulness skills, ongoing web access to the RTI video and video vignettes of caregivers of technology-dependent children describing resourcefulness skill application in daily life, 4 weeks of skills' reinforcement using daily log, weekly phone calls for the first 4 weeks, and booster sessions at 2 and 4 months post enrollment. The Attention Control group will receive weekly phone calls for the first 4 weeks and at 2 and 4 months post enrollment plus any usual care. The aims of the study are to: 1) Determine whether the RTI versus Attention Control improves psychological (mental HRQoL depressive cognitions, depressive symptoms, appraised stress, burden) and physical outcomes (physical HRQoL, chronic stress [hair cortisol]) over 9 months in parents of technology-dependent children, after controlling for covariates (parent race/ethnicity and gender, family income, and children's functional status, type of technology). 2) Determine whether changes in psychological and physical outcomes are mediated by changes in parents' levels of resourcefulness based on intervention condition. 3) Compare self-management behavior (sleep, positive health practices) over 9 months in parents who received RTI versus Attention Control. 4) Explore whether resourcefulness is a mediator between intervention condition and self-management behaviors controlling for baseline self-management behavior over 9 months. 5) Explore the relationship between self-management behavior and parent psychological and physical outcomes based on intervention condition. Our study will be the first to test a cognitive-behavioral RTI for this caregiver population. 6) Compare target children's ER visits, hospital days over 9 months based on parent intervention condition. If shown to be efficacious, it can be replicated with other caregivers of children with complex chronic conditions with strong potential for translation into practice.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 202
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Ohio
    • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106-5065
      • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• parent primary caregiver (biological, adoptive, or foster mother, father, grandmother, or grandfather) for a technology-dependent child based on the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) classification criteria (Group 1, mechanical ventilators; Group 2, intravenous nutrition/medication; Group 3, respiratory or nutritional support);
• at least 18 years of age;
• able to speak and understand English;
• the technology-dependent child must be age 17.2 years or younger and receive care in the home from his/her parent. For children with more than one type of technology, we will follow OTA guidelines for classification.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Parents of children with a cancer diagnosis due to the short term use of technology following initial diagnosis and treatment

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Attention Control; The Attention Control arm will receive weekly phone calls for the first 4 weeks and at 2 and 4 months post-enrollment plus the current standard of care, whereby caregivers phone their healthcare providers when they have questions or concerns
Experimental: Resourcefulness Training Intervention©; The Resourcefulness Training© arm will receive (a) individually tailored instruction on personal and social resourcefulness skills via the Resourcefulness Video and intervention nurse, (b) journal-writing instruction to describe resourcefulness application, (c) access to the study website with videotape vignettes and Resourcefulness Video, and (d) boosters at 2 and 4 months post-enrollment that will include reinforcement of skills learned and additional journal writing.	Behavioral: Resourcefulness Training©; The intervention includes self-help and help-seeking skills.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Psychological Outcome- Health Related Quality of Life	Mental Health Related Quality of Life (PROMIS Short Form version 1.2- Global Health). Ten (10) Items. Score Range: 10 - 50. Global Mental Health (GMH) score converted to a T-Score metric - produces a physical and a mental health score. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured or better mental health.	Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline
Depressive Cognitions	Screening Measure for Early Detection of Depressive Symptoms: The Depressive Cognition Scale. Measures depressive cognitions and negative thoughts that may lead to clinical depression. Eight (8) Items. Score Range: 0 - 40. Higher scores indicating more depressive cognitions.	Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline
Physical Outcome	Physical Health Related Quality of Life (PROMIS Short Form version 1.2- Global Health), Ten (10) Items. Score Range: 10 - 50 Global Mental Health (GMH) score converted to a T-Score metric- produces a physical and a mental health score. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. Higher score means better physical health.	Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline
Self-Management- Sleep- Subjective	Appraised Sleep Quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a l-month time interval. Nineteen (19) items are grouped into seven component scores, each weighted equally on a 0-3 scale. Score Range (Global PSQI Score) is 0-21. Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. Sub Scales are summed	Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline
Positive Health Practices	Personal Lifestyle Questionnaire- Positive Health Practices Personal Lifestyle Questionnaire (PLQ). Measures the positive health practices of exercise, substance use, nutrition, relaxation, safety, and health promotion. Twenty-four (24) items 4-point summated rating scale with a range of possible scores from 24 to 96 Higher scores reflect the practice of more health behaviors. Total scores are reported.	Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline
Depressive Symptoms	"Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Short Form - Depressive Symtoms "Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Short Form Version 1.0 - Depression 8a. Assess self-reported negative mood , views of self , social cognition, and decreased positive affect and engagement." Eight (8) Items. Score Range: 5 (Min)-40 (Max) A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. Total Score is reported	Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Number of Technology-Dependent Children with ER Visits and Rehospitalizations	Number of ER Visits and Rehospitalizations of Technology-Dependent Child	Total over the 9 months the parent is enrolled in the study

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Valerie A. Toly, PhD, RN, Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): July 8, 2019
• Primary Completion (Actual): December 21, 2022
• Study Completion (Actual): December 21, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 22, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 24, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): September 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): January 12, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 11, 2023
• Last Verified: January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Mental Health; Physical Health; Technology-Dependent Children
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pathologic Processes; Disease Attributes; Chronic Disease; Multiple Chronic Conditions
• Other Study ID Numbers: STUDY20181088

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: Yes
• IPD Plan Description: Resource Sharing Plan: We support the principles, responsibilities and oversight of data sharing as articulated in the Final NIH Statement on Sharing Research Data (http://grants2.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-032.html). Once all data are collected, the research team will work to establish a database for the purpose of implementation of these standards, but with an emphasis upon the safeguarding of patient privacy, maintaining scientific integrity, and ensuring database privacy and security. Our goals will be to support the NIH intent of promoting dissemination of research findings and reagents to benefit NIH researchers country-wide and to promote rapid dissemination of clinical research findings. The data will be shared once all Human Subject identifiers are removed and preliminary analyses have been completed and collaborative ventures will be explored with the other investigators.
• IPD Sharing Time Frame: The data will be shared once all Human Subject identifiers are removed and preliminary analyses have been completed and collaborative ventures will be explored with the other investigators.
• IPD Sharing Access Criteria: Must enter into data use agreement with Case Western Reserve University and the investigators.
• IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type: Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP); Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No