Diagnostic Value of Ultra-low Dose Thoracic Scanner for the Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformation Detection in HHT Patient (ULD OSLER)

September 3, 2025 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is linked to a dysregulation of angiogenesis leading to the formation of arteriovenous malformations (AVM): cutaneo-mucous telangiectasia and visceral shunts. The diagnosis is clinical and based on Curaçao criteria: recurrent epistaxis, cutaneo-mucous telangiectasia, hereditary signs and presence of visceral AVM.

Pulmonary AVMs (PAVM) expose patients to many potentially life-threatening complications, such as strokes or brain abscesses due to the right-left shunt created and the lack of filtration barrier of the pulmonary capillary within the AVM. These patients should therefore have regular monitoring throughout their life by a chest CT scanner every 5 to 10 years in the absence of PAVM at the initial scan or more often if PAVMs are present. The management of PAVMs is based on their early detection and embolization in interventional radiology during which is set up within the afferent artery of the PAVM an embolizing agent, the coil.

However, the risk of cumulative irradiation exposure from thoracic scanners and repeated thoracic embolizations over time could be reduces by a decrease of X-rays dose.

A new thoracic CT imaging protocol validated in the United States in the primary screening of lung cancer, the ultra-low dose protocol, is a CT scanner acquired at an irradiation dose equivalent to that of a frontal chest x-ray and in profile. The dose reduction is of 40 times the usual dose of a chest CT scanner.

The lung parenchyma has a high natural contrast on thoracic CT images and there are few adjacent attenuating structures allowing a drastic reduction of dose. However, from this dose, the image quality is degraded with an increase of the image noise. The diagnostic performances have to be confirmed with qualitative and quantitative measurements.

Thus, the objective of this study is to compare the sensitivity and the specificity of the current scanner and the ultra-low dose scanner to reduce the exposure to X-rays.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bron, France, 69500
        • Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hopital Louis Pradel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient monitored for a clinically confirmed Rendu-Osler disease and / or confirmed by molecular biology, seen for an initial assessment or for a reassessment of PAVM (after treatment or without treatment)
  • Patient who agreed to participate in the study and signed the written informed consent
  • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme or similar

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant, nursing (lactating) or at risk of pregnancy (verified by a urine test before performing the scanner)
  • Patient who is protected adults under the terms of the law (French Public Health Code).
  • Patient who has not or poorly understand French

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Low dose CT scanner and Ultra low dose CT Scan
Thoracic low dose CT acquisition and Thoracic ultra-low dose CT acquisition
CT scan acquisition will be performed at 140 kVp (kilovolt peak), 10 mAs(milliampere), CTDI 1.3 mGy with an irradiation dose 0.51 mSv (milliSievert). The CT image will be reconstructed and analyzed in parenchyma window. The CT images will be blinded and re-read by two independent senior radiologists 3 to 6 weeks apart between each re-reading.
CT acquisition will be performed at 80 kVp for patient with a body mass index<30, and 100 kVp with a body mass index>30, 10 mAs, CTDI 0.3 and 0.6 mGy with an irradiation dose 0.15-0.30 mSv. The CT images will be reconstructed and analyzed in mediastinal window. The CT images will be blinded and re-read by two independent senior radiologists 3 to 6 weeks apart between each re-reading.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of diagnostic performances (specificity and sensitivity) between ultra-low dose and low dose CT scanner
Time Frame: Day one
calculation of the sensibility, specificity and the predictive values using the Pearson's method after judgment of the presence or absence of pulmonary AVM to treat on each acquisition (low dose and ultra-low dose).
Day one

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the effective radiation dose
Time Frame: at thoracic CT acquisition - day one
The effective dose was estimated from the product of the dose length product (DLP) using a conversion coefficient of 0.017 mSv ( milliSievert ) mGy (milligray )-1 cm-1 reported in the European Guidelines for chest examinations.
at thoracic CT acquisition - day one
the computed tomography dose index (CTDI)
Time Frame: at thoracic CT acquisition - day one
The volume of CTDI was recorded in mGy.
at thoracic CT acquisition - day one
the dose length product (DLP)
Time Frame: at thoracic CT acquisition - day one
The DLP was recorded in mGy.cm.
at thoracic CT acquisition - day one
the size of afferent artery
Time Frame: At the two re-readings - 3 months
measurement in millimeter
At the two re-readings - 3 months
the size of efferent vein
Time Frame: At the two re-readings - 3 months
measurement in millimeter
At the two re-readings - 3 months
the number of afferent artery
Time Frame: At the two re-readings - 3 months
measurement in millimeter
At the two re-readings - 3 months
the quality of images
Time Frame: At the two re-readings - 3 months
a grading score is used from "insufficient" to "good" to assess the quality of images produced by standard, iDose, and MRI reconstruction protocol
At the two re-readings - 3 months
the confidence of the diagnosis
Time Frame: At the two re-readings - 3 months
A confidence score is used (1 = no diagnostic confidence, 2 = average diagnostic confidence, 3 = good diagnostic confidence, 4 = excellent diagnostic confidence)
At the two re-readings - 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 28, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 28, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic

Clinical Trials on Low CT scanner without injection dose

Subscribe