Norwegian Study of Oral Cladribine and Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis (NOR-MS) (NOR-MS)

May 5, 2022 updated by: Gro Owren Nygaard, Oslo University Hospital

Norwegian Study of Oral Cladribine and Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis (NOR-MS) A Prospective Randomized Open-label Blinded Endpoint (PROBE) Multicenter Non-inferiority Study

The main aim and overall objective of the study is to assess whether rituximab is non-inferior to cladribine for the treatment of relapsing MS. Secondly, the investigators will test specific blood and MRI biomarkers that may contribute to future personalized treatment for MS patients. Furthermore, the investigators want to evaluate the health economic consequences of the two therapies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating and neurodegenerative inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, affecting more than 12 000 patients in Norway and more than 2.2 mill patients worldwide.

Oral cladribine is one of the first choices for highly efficient disease modulatory treatment (DMT), while Rituximab is used off-label as DMT in relapsing MS. Large observational studies indicate good tolerance and treatment effect of rituximab in MS and studies from other diseases indicate a good safety profile. However, no phase 3 studies have been performed to test whether rituximab is as efficient as established MS treatments. Formal safety data is also lacking for the treatment with rituximab in MS.

The investigators will perform a prospective randomized open-label blinded endpoint multicenter non-inferiority study. The primary objective is to test whether rituximab is non-inferior to oral cladribine in the treatment of relapsing MS. 264 MS patients aged 18-65 years with relapsing MS will be recruited from 10 centers and followed for 96 weeks. The primary endpoint is difference in new T2 lesions between the groups. Furthermore, the investigators will test novel blood sample and MRI biomarkers to provide tools for personalized MS treatments. Finally, the health economic consequences of these treatment options will be evaluated.

This study will guide clinicians and patients in the future treatment choice for MS and can potentially make a huge impact on the costs of future MS treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

264

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Gro Owren Nygaard, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: +47 91757192
  • Email: uxgryg@ous-hf.no

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Helle Stangeland, MSc
  • Phone Number: +47 90029660
  • Email: stahel@ous-hf.no

Study Locations

      • Oslo, Norway, 0424
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Einar August Høgestøl, MD, PhDfell
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Elisabeth Gulowsen Celius, MD, dr med
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Pål Berg-Hansen, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Hiba Bashari, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Iselin Marie Wedding, MD, PhD
      • Trondheim, Norway, 7006
        • Recruiting
        • St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Buskerud
      • Drammen, Buskerud, Norway, 3004
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Neurology - Drammen, Vestre Viken HF
        • Contact:
    • Oppland
      • Lillehammer, Oppland, Norway, 2629
    • Rogaland
      • Stavanger, Rogaland, Norway, 4068
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Neurology, Stavanger universitetssykehus
        • Contact:
    • Sogn Og Fjordane
      • Førde, Sogn Og Fjordane, Norway, 6807
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Neurology - Førde, Helse Førde HF
        • Contact:
    • Telemark
      • Skien, Telemark, Norway, 3710
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Neurology - Skien, Sykehuset Telemark
        • Contact:
          • Heidi Flemmen, MD, PhDfell
          • Phone Number: +47 35003500
          • Email: fleh@sthf.no
    • Troms
      • Tromsø, Troms, Norway, 9038
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Neurology - Tromsø, University Hospital of North Norway
        • Contact:
    • Vest-Agder
      • Kristiansand, Vest-Agder, Norway, 4604
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Neurology - Kristiansand, Sørlandet sykehus HF
        • Contact:
          • Åslaug Lorentzen, MD, PhD
          • Phone Number: +47 90610600
          • Email: aaslor@sshf.no
    • Vestfold
      • Tønsberg, Vestfold, Norway, 3103
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Neurology - Tønsberg, Sykehuset i Vestfold HF
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Kennet Idland, MD
    • Østfold
      • Sarpsborg, Østfold, Norway, 1714
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Neurology - Kalnes, Sykehuset Østfold HF
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • A diagnosis of relapsing MS according to the 2017 McDonald criteria
  • Disease activity seen as either a clinical relapse or MRI activity during the last 12 months
  • EDSS between 0 and 5.5
  • Thrombocytes and leukocytes within normal range, and lymphocytes above 0.8 x10 9/L before first dose of study medication
  • A) For women of childbearing potential: accepting to use adequate contraception in the trial period. If randomized to cladribine, women who use systemic hormonal contraception must accept to use additional barrier contraception during each treatment cycle and for four weeks after each treatment cycle.
  • B) For men: If randomized to cladribine, accepting to use adequate contraception in the safety period of 6 months after each treatment cycle.
  • Able to understand written and spoken Norwegian or English
  • Able to complete treatment or follow-ups in the study (e.g. no contraindications for MRI, severe psychiatric disease, drug abuse or plans of moving)
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any contraindication or increased risk of side-effects from rituximab or cladribine (such as ongoing acute or chronic infection, live vaccination less than 4 weeks before start of treatment or planned live vaccination, immunocompromised, previous or active malignant disease, ongoing glucocorticoid treatment or allergy against any products of the medication)
  • Previous use of any of cladribine, rituximab, alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, hematopoietic stem cell therapy (HSCT) or other immunosuppression with long lasting effects
  • Fingolimod or natalizumab treatment within the last six months before inclusion
  • Current pregnancy or lactation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Rituximab
Biosimilar rituximab concentrate for solution for infusion
Biosimilar rituximab concentrate for solution for infusion
Active Comparator: Cladribine
Mavenclad oral cladribine tablets
Mavenclad oral cladribine tablets
Other Names:
  • Mavenclad

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of new or enlarging cerebral MRI T2 lesions
Time Frame: Week 12-96
The primary outcome is the number of new or enlarging cerebral MRI T2 lesions per patient from week 12 to week 96
Week 12-96

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
T2 lesions after 48 weeks
Time Frame: Week 12-48
Number of new or enlarging cerebral MRI T2 lesions per patient from week 12 to week 48
Week 12-48
Annual clinical relapse rate (ARR)
Time Frame: Week -2 to 96
Annual clinical relapse rate (ARR) at 24, 48 and 96 weeks
Week -2 to 96
Relapse-free patients
Time Frame: Week -2 to 96
Proportion of relapse-free patients at 24, 48 and 96 weeks
Week -2 to 96
Disability progression
Time Frame: Week -2 to 96
Proportion of patients with 24 weeks confirmed disability progression (24-CDP) on EDSS at 48 and 96 weeks
Week -2 to 96
Change in disability
Time Frame: Week -2 to 96
Change in disability on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) from week -2 to 48 and 96 weeks. Disability progression is defined as an increase in EDSS of at least 1.5 points if baseline EDSS was 0, 1 point with baseline EDSS 0.5-4.5 and 0.5 point with baseline EDSS 5-5.5. EDSS is a scale from 0-10 measuring neurological disability.
Week -2 to 96

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MRI from baseline
Time Frame: Week -6 - 96
Number of new or enlarging cerebral MRI T2 lesions from week -6 to week 12, 48 and 96
Week -6 - 96
No evidence of disease activity (NEDA 3)
Time Frame: Week -2 - 96
NEDA 3 (no evidence of disease activity) defined as no new or enlarging T2 lesions, no clinical relapse and no confirmed disability progression on EDSS from before treatment in week -2 to 48 and 96 weeks. Rate of NEDA in the two treatment groups are compared.
Week -2 - 96
MRI contrast enhancing lesions
Time Frame: Week 12-96
Number of new or persisting contrast enhancing (CE) MRI T1 lesions at 12, 48 and 96 weeks compared to previous scan
Week 12-96
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) concerning work capacity
Time Frame: Week -2 - 96

Patient self-evaluation with PROMS at week

-2, 48 and 96 using questions about work capacity. The numerical values of the respones to the questions concerning adherence to work (percentage in full time work) in the two treatment groups are compared.

Week -2 - 96
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) of fatigue
Time Frame: Week -2 - 96

Patient self-evaluation with PROMS at week

-2, 48 and 96 using questions about fatigue, the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC). The FSMC includes a Likert-type 5-point scale (ranging from 'does not apply at all' to 'applies completely') and produces a score between 1 and 5 for each scored question. Thus minimum value is 20 (no fatigue at all) and maximum value is 100 (severest grade of fatigue).The numerical values of the scores of the questionnaire in the two treatment groups are compared.

Week -2 - 96
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) of anxiety and depression
Time Frame: Week -2 - 96

Patient self-evaluation with PROMS at week

-2, 48 and 96 using questions concerning anxiety and depression, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression.Thus minimum value is 0 (no anxiety or depression at all) and maximum value is 21 (severest grade of anxiety or depression).The numerical values of the scores of the questionnaire in the two treatment groups are compared.

Week -2 - 96
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) of Health related quality of life
Time Frame: Week -2 - 96

Patient self-evaluation with PROMS at week

-2, 48 and 96 using questions concerning Health Related Quality of Life using the questionnaire EuroQol 5 Dimension scale (EQ5D). The respondents are asked to choose one of five statements which best describes their health status. Rated level can be coded as a number between 1-5, which indicates having no problems for 1, having slight problems for 2, having moderate problems for 3, having severe problems for 4, and having extreme problems for 5.The numerical values of the scores of the questionnaires in the two treatment groups are compared.

Week -2 - 96
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) of treatment satisfaction
Time Frame: Week -2 - 96
Patient self-evaluation with PROMS at week 48 and 96 using questions concerning treatment satisfaction, measured with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM 1.4). The TSQM consists of fourteen questions distributed across four domains: effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction. The score ranges from 0 to 100 in each domain and, the higher the score, the greater the patient satisfaction with medication. The numerical values of the scores of the questionnaires in the two treatment groups are compared.
Week -2 - 96
Treatment adherence
Time Frame: Week 48-96
Proportion of patients not receiving treatment per protocol at week 48 and 96
Week 48-96
Safety endpoints blood sample: Occurrence of leukopenia indicated from blood samples
Time Frame: Week 0-96
Occurrence of leukopenia grade 1 or 2 (mild), 3 or 4 (severe), according to World Health Organization (WH) using indicated from blood samples between first treatment at week 0 and end of study at week 96
Week 0-96
Safety endpoints blood sample: Occurrence of lymphopenia indicated from blood samples
Time Frame: Week 0-96
Occurrence of lymphopenia grade 1 or 2 (mild), 3 or 4 (severe), according to World Health Organization (WH) using indicated from blood samples between first treatment at week 0 and end of study at week 96
Week 0-96
Safety endpoints blood sample: Occurrence of thrombocytopenia indicated from blood samples
Time Frame: Week 0-96
Occurrence of thrombocytopenia grade 1 or 2 (mild), 3 or 4 (severe), according to World Health Organization (WH) using indicated from blood samples between first treatment at week 0 and end of study at week 96
Week 0-96
Safety endpoints blood sample: Occurrence of anemia indicated from blood samples
Time Frame: Week 0-96
Occurrence of anemia grade 1 or 2 (mild), 3 or 4 (severe), according to World Health Organization (WH) using indicated from blood samples between first treatment at week 0 and end of study at week 96
Week 0-96
Safety endpoints adverse events
Time Frame: Week 0-96
Adverse events (AE), serious adverse events (SAE) and suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSAR) reported between first treatment at week 0 and end of study at week 96
Week 0-96
Blood sample neurofilament
Time Frame: Week -1 - 96
Concentration of blood serum levels of neurofilament (NfL) at week -1, 51 and 96 weeks in the two treatment Groups are compared.
Week -1 - 96
Blood sample glial fibrillary acidic protein
Time Frame: Week -1 - 96
Concentration of blood serum levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) at week -1, 51 and 96 weeks in the two treatment Groups are compared.
Week -1 - 96
Blood sample immunization antibodies for pneumococcus
Time Frame: Week -2 - 96
Specific antibody titers for pneumococcus at week -2, 8, 51 and 96 are compared in the treatment Groups after immunization
Week -2 - 96
Blood sample rituximab
Time Frame: Week -2 - 96
Levels of rituximab in serum at week 8, 51 and 96 is related to MRI, relapse rate and EDSS in the rituximab treatment group
Week -2 - 96
Blood sample rituximab antibody
Time Frame: Week -2 - 96
Specific antibody titers at week 8, 51 and 96 of rituximab antibodies are correlated With rituximab concentration, MRI, EDSS and relapse rate in the rituximab treatment group
Week -2 - 96
T2 lesion volume
Time Frame: Week 12-96
T2 lesion volume at 12, 48 and 96 weeks are compared between the treatment groups
Week 12-96
Brain volumes
Time Frame: Week 12-96
Brain volumes at 12, 48 and 96 weeks are compared between the treatment groups
Week 12-96
Advanced MRI analysis machine learning
Time Frame: Week 12-96
Estimation of "Brain Age" at 12, 48 and 96 weeks Results of MRI analyses with and without AI and/or machine learning
Week 12-96
Health economic analysis
Time Frame: -2 - 96
Direct and indirect treatment costs (medication, out-patient clinic visits, hospitalizations related to treatment), working status) and health related quality of life (EQ5D)
-2 - 96

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hanne Flistad Harbo, MD, PhD, Oslo University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Gro Owren Nygaard, MD, PhD, Oslo University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Rituximab

3
Subscribe