2BALANCE: Cognitive-motor Dual-tasking in Persons With Vestibular Disorders

September 25, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Ghent

2BALANCE: The Impact of a Vestibular Dysfunction on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Adults in Single and Dual-task Condition

The overall aim of this study is to elucidate the impact of a vestibular dysfunction on the cognitive and motor performance by means of an extensive test protocol, evaluating the vestibular, cognitive and motor function using single as well as dual-task paradigms.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The test protocol consists of five cognitive tasks, all assessing a different cognitive domain: executive function, working memory, processing speed, and visuospatial abilities (mental rotation and visuospatial memory). These cognitive tasks will be performed separately (in single task condition, while seated), as well as while performing different motor tasks (in dual-task condition). These motor tasks will also be performed in single task condition (without performing the cognitive tasks).

The study consists of the establishment of normative age-related data for the single as well as dual-task protocol in healthy adults, age ranging from 18 to 65 years old (objective 1). Subsequently, the test protocol will be validated in persons with bilateral vestibulopathy (objective 2). Finally, a cross-sectional study in persons with unilateral vestibular impairment will take place, and the results on the single as well as dual-task components will be compared to normative data, as well as to persons with bilateral vestibulopathy (objective 3).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ghent, Belgium, 9000
        • University Hospital Ghent, departement otorhinolaryngology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy adults were used for establishing normative data of the dual-task protocol (convenience sampling).

Persons with bilateral vestibulopathy, established by vestibular assessment, were used for the validation of the study (recruited at the Ghent University Hospital, Antwerp University Hospital, and Maastricht University Medical Center).

Persons with unilateral vestibular impairment, established by vestibular assessment, were used for the cross-sectional study (recruited at the Ghent University Hospital).

Description

For healthy controls:

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Vestibular disorders or subjective dizziness complains (past or present)
  • Hearing loss
  • Mild Cognitive Impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MOCA)
  • Visual impairment (Snellen Chart)
  • Motor abnormalities (anamnestic questionnaire)

For bilateral vestibulopathy (BV):

Inclusion criteria:

  • Bilaterally reduced vestibular function, as defined by the Bárány Criteria for BV(Michael Strupp 2017):
  • the horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain should be <0.6 bilaterally and/or
  • the sum of the maximal peak velocities of caloric response for stimulation with warm and cold water should be <6◦/s bilaterally and/or
  • the horizontal angular VOR gain should be <0.1 upon sinusoidal stimulation on the rotation test

For unilateral vestibulopathy:

Inclusion criteria:

  • the horizontal VOR gain should be <0.6 unilaterally and/or
  • the slow component velocity of the caloric response should be below the age-dependent normative data unilaterally, established by Maes et al. (2010)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Healthy adults
Standardization and collecting normative age-related data for cognitive and motor single tasks, as well as cognitive-motor dual-tasks
Assessment of the 2BALANCE protocol: dual-task protocol consisting of a motor task, cognitive task, and motor-cognitive dual-tasks
Bilateral vestibulopathy
Validation of cognitive and motor single tasks, as well as cognitive-motor dual-tasks
Assessment of the 2BALANCE protocol: dual-task protocol consisting of a motor task, cognitive task, and motor-cognitive dual-tasks
Unilateral vestibular impairment
Cross-sectional study on cognitive and motor single tasks, as well as cognitive-motor dual-tasks, in persons with unilateral vestibular impairment
Assessment of the 2BALANCE protocol: dual-task protocol consisting of a motor task, cognitive task, and motor-cognitive dual-tasks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stride length measured on the GAITRite Walkway (ProCare)
Time Frame: 4 years
Stride length measured in centimeters on pressure sensitive mat
4 years
Step length measured on the GAITRite Walkway (ProCare)
Time Frame: 4 years
Step length measured in centimeters on pressure sensitive mat
4 years
Stride width measured on the GAITRite Walkway (ProCare)
Time Frame: 4 years
Stride width measured in centimeters on pressure sensitive mat
4 years
Step width measured on the GAITRite Walkway (ProCare)
Time Frame: 4 years
Step width measured in centimeters on pressure sensitive mat
4 years
Step time measured on the GAITRite Walkway (ProCare)
Time Frame: 4 years
Step time measured in seconds on pressure sensitive mat
4 years
Stride time measured on the GAITRite Walkway (ProCare)
Time Frame: 4 years
Stride time measured in seconds on pressure sensitive mat
4 years
Velocity measured on the GAITRite Walkway (ProCare)
Time Frame: 4 years
Velocity measured in centimeters per second on pressure sensitive mat
4 years
Surface (mm²) of the confidence ellipse which contains 90% of the center of pressure (COP) measured on the GymPlate (TechnoConcepts)
Time Frame: 4 years
Confidence ellipse measured in millimeter² on force platform
4 years
Length covered by the consecutive center of pressure (COP) positions measured on the GymPlate (TechnoConcepts)
Time Frame: 4 years
Length of the COP measured in millimeter on force platform
4 years
Mean velocity of the oscillations of the center of pressure (COP) measured on the GymPlate (TechnoConcepts)
Time Frame: 4 years
Length of the COP measured in millimeter per second on force platform
4 years
Velocity variance measured on the GymPlate (TechnoConcepts)
Time Frame: 4 years
Length of the COP measured in millimeter² per second² on force platform
4 years
Percent accuracy on the Corsi Block Test
Time Frame: 4 years
Measure of visuospatial memory
4 years
Response time on the Corsi Block Test
Time Frame: 4 years
Measure of visuospatial memory in milliseconds
4 years
Percentage of accuracy on the mental rotation task
Time Frame: 4 years
Measure of mental rotation (visuospatial cognition)
4 years
Response time on the mental rotation task
Time Frame: 4 years
Measure of mental rotation (visuospatial cognition) in milliseconds
4 years
Percentage of accuracy on the backward digit recall test
Time Frame: 4 years
Measure of working memory
4 years
Response time on the backward digit recall test
Time Frame: 4 years
Measure of working memory in milliseconds
4 years
Percentage of accuracy on the symbol digit modalities test
Time Frame: 4 years
Measure of processing speed
4 years
Response time on the symbol digit modalities test
Time Frame: 4 years
Measure of processing speed in milliseconds
4 years
Percentage of accuracy on the auditory Stroop task
Time Frame: 4 years
Measure of response inhibition
4 years
Response time on the auditory Stroop task
Time Frame: 4 years
Measure of response inhibition
4 years
Percentage of accuracy on the visual Stroop task
Time Frame: 4 years
Measure of response inhibition
4 years
Response time on the visual Stroop task
Time Frame: 4 years
Measure of response inhibition
4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Leen Maes, PhD, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 12, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BC-7935

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vestibular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Behavioural

3
Subscribe