Post-Market Optimization Study of the EMPOWER® RF Catheter to Ablate Soft Tissue Lesions in the Lung

March 26, 2020 updated by: Broncus Medical Inc
A post-market study to assess the performance and safety of a RF ablation catheter to bronchoscopically ablate lung lesions will be evaluated in patients with confirmed diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer or metastatic lung lesions who are scheduled for surgical resection.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, post-market study of bronchoscopic radio frequency (RF) ablation treatment malignant lung lesions prior to surgical resection. Up to 15 patients will be treated at the participating sites.

Patients identified for the study will have been scheduled for surgical resection as part of their treatment for lung lesions. The RF ablation procedure will be performed during a standard-of-care bronchoscopic procedure at minimum of 24 hours prior to resection. The patients exits the study following surgical resection. The resected tissue will undergo pathological evaluation for tissue viability.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

15

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and/or pulmonary metastases that are recommended for curative lung resection (pneumonectomy, lobectomy). Enrolled patients will have a microscopically confirmed malignancy, ensuring patients are surgical candidates.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years at screening
  2. Proven NSCLC or pulmonary metastases from extra-thoracic primary tumor
  3. Eligible for standard of practice lung resection (pneumonectomy, lobectomy)
  4. Tumor/lesion > 2cm along the major diameter with no visible necrosis
  5. Signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. An implantable pacemaker, defibrillator, or other active implants
  2. Any other severe or life-threatening comorbidity that could increase the risk associated with bronchoscopic RF ablation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Roll-in
Initial patients enrolled until optimal RF algorithm is determined
A catheter introduced into the lung lesion via a bronchoscope, used to deliver radiofrequency (RF) energy for the purpose of ablation
Other Names:
  • EMPOWER® RF Catheter
Optimized
Patients treated using optimal RF algorithm
A catheter introduced into the lung lesion via a bronchoscope, used to deliver radiofrequency (RF) energy for the purpose of ablation
Other Names:
  • EMPOWER® RF Catheter

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance - maximum diameter of zone of thermal necrosis surrounding treated lesion
Time Frame: The interval between ablation and tissue resection for pathological analysis is a minimum of 24 hours, but the exact interval depends on the investigator's standard of care
Maximum diameter (in mm) of ablation zone (thermal necrosis) surrounding treated lesion as measured in resected tissue by quantitative histopathological and gross pathological analysis
The interval between ablation and tissue resection for pathological analysis is a minimum of 24 hours, but the exact interval depends on the investigator's standard of care
Performance - ability of the user and device to deliver ablative treatment in accordance with the catheter's Instructions for Use
Time Frame: Assessed at the time of the RF ablation procedure
The ability of the ablation treatment to be delivered as per the Instructions for Use will be assessed using a binary categorical scale (yes/no)
Assessed at the time of the RF ablation procedure
Safety - Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)
Time Frame: AEs and SAEs related to the RF procedure/device will be reported for the interval beginning with the RF ablation procedure and ending with the surgical resection of the ablated lung tissueion
The incidence of reported adverse events and serious adverse events related to the RF ablation procedure/device
AEs and SAEs related to the RF procedure/device will be reported for the interval beginning with the RF ablation procedure and ending with the surgical resection of the ablated lung tissueion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Felix J Herth, MD, PhD, Heidelberg University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 9, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Protocol 46

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Diseases

Clinical Trials on Radiofrequency (RF) catheter

3
Subscribe