Treating Stress Urinary Incontinence: Laparoscopic Obturator Urethropexy vs Burch Urethropexy

November 13, 2021 updated by: Dr. Nucelio Luiz de Barros Moreira Lemos MD, PhD, Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada

Prospective Review of Laparoscopic Burch Urethropexy Compared With a Novel Technique of Laparoscopic Obturator Urethropexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a highly prevalent concern within the female population. Although mid urethral slings (MUS) have been the first line treatment for SUI for almost twenty years, due to recent FDA warnings and many countries banning the use of vaginal mesh, a significant portion of patients now request non-mesh anti-incontinence procedures. In such cases, Burch colposuspension would be the next option discussed with patients.

In the short term, the efficacy of Burch colposuspension is comparable to MUS. However, the noteworthy disadvantages of Burch colposuspension include a high rate of urinary retention. This increased risk of urinary retention is due to the acute angle of the stitches, and is a problem that Burch colposuspension shares with the retropubic sling, a type of acutely-angled MUS. A variant of the retropubic sling, the transobturator tape (TOT), has shown that a rounder angle of elevation significantly reduces the risk of urinary retention. As such, this study proposes a novel technique of laparoscopic obturator urethropexy (LOU) as an alternative to the traditional Burch colposuspension.

In this new proposed technique, stitches are placed into the obturator internus fascia rather than Cooper's ligament, reducing the angle of elevation of the bladder neck, aiming to lower the risk of post-operative urinary retention. The aim of our randomized control trial is to assess the effectiveness of LOU compared to Burch colposuspension in terms of urinary continence. Our secondary aim is to report on perioperative and postoperative complications, functional outcomes including urinary retention, recurrent urinary tract infection, recurrent/persistent urgency, de novo urgency, recurrent SUI, and sexual function, as well as overall quality of life.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18 years of age and be able to read and write English
  • Women with symptomatic SUI, stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence symptoms confirmed on urodynamic study (UDS), or occult SUI (i.e. demonstrable urinary leakage on preoperative urodynamics with prolapse reduction in a patient without overt urinary incontinence symptoms), including women undergoing concomitant pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery or MUS sling removal

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected disease that affects bladder function (e.g. multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease), including a known diagnosis of voiding dysfunction
  • Pregnancy
  • Desired fertility
  • Urethral diverticulum
  • History of radical pelvic surgery or pelvic radiation therapy
  • Current chemotherapy or radiation therapy for malignancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Laparoscopic Obturator Urethropexy
Suspending the periurethral vaginal tissue to the obturator internus fascia bilaterally via sutures, creating a support for the bladder neck compartment
Suspending the periurethral vaginal tissue to the obturator internus fascia bilaterally via sutures, creating a support for the bladder neck compartment.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Burch Urethropexy
Suspending the periurethral vaginal tissue to Cooper's ligament bilaterally via sutures, creating a support for the bladder neck compartment
Suspending the periurethral vaginal tissue to Cooper's ligament bilaterally via sutures, creating a support for the bladder neck compartment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective Continence Rates
Time Frame: 1 year
Patient reported symptoms of incontinence
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective continence rates
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
Objective continence rates will be assessed with a cough test and a one-hour pad test.
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
Perioperative and postoperative complications
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
Perioperative and postoperative complications will be assessed using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification.
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
Urinary retention
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
Urinary retention will be assessed by an elevated post-void residual urine
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
Recurrent urinary tract infection
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
Recurrent urinary tract infection will be assessed through a urine culture
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
Recurrent/persistent/de novo urgency
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
Recurrent/persistent/de novo urgency will be based on patient symptoms
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
Recurrent SUI
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
Recurrent SUI will be assessed through a cough test/a one-hour pad test
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
Sexual function
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
Using the Female Sexual Function Index-6 (FSFI-6).
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
Overall quality of life
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
Using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20).
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2032

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2033

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Obturator Urethropexy

Subscribe