- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04133935
Treating Stress Urinary Incontinence: Laparoscopic Obturator Urethropexy vs Burch Urethropexy
Prospective Review of Laparoscopic Burch Urethropexy Compared With a Novel Technique of Laparoscopic Obturator Urethropexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a highly prevalent concern within the female population. Although mid urethral slings (MUS) have been the first line treatment for SUI for almost twenty years, due to recent FDA warnings and many countries banning the use of vaginal mesh, a significant portion of patients now request non-mesh anti-incontinence procedures. In such cases, Burch colposuspension would be the next option discussed with patients.
In the short term, the efficacy of Burch colposuspension is comparable to MUS. However, the noteworthy disadvantages of Burch colposuspension include a high rate of urinary retention. This increased risk of urinary retention is due to the acute angle of the stitches, and is a problem that Burch colposuspension shares with the retropubic sling, a type of acutely-angled MUS. A variant of the retropubic sling, the transobturator tape (TOT), has shown that a rounder angle of elevation significantly reduces the risk of urinary retention. As such, this study proposes a novel technique of laparoscopic obturator urethropexy (LOU) as an alternative to the traditional Burch colposuspension.
In this new proposed technique, stitches are placed into the obturator internus fascia rather than Cooper's ligament, reducing the angle of elevation of the bladder neck, aiming to lower the risk of post-operative urinary retention. The aim of our randomized control trial is to assess the effectiveness of LOU compared to Burch colposuspension in terms of urinary continence. Our secondary aim is to report on perioperative and postoperative complications, functional outcomes including urinary retention, recurrent urinary tract infection, recurrent/persistent urgency, de novo urgency, recurrent SUI, and sexual function, as well as overall quality of life.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 18 years of age and be able to read and write English
- Women with symptomatic SUI, stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence symptoms confirmed on urodynamic study (UDS), or occult SUI (i.e. demonstrable urinary leakage on preoperative urodynamics with prolapse reduction in a patient without overt urinary incontinence symptoms), including women undergoing concomitant pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery or MUS sling removal
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known or suspected disease that affects bladder function (e.g. multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease), including a known diagnosis of voiding dysfunction
- Pregnancy
- Desired fertility
- Urethral diverticulum
- History of radical pelvic surgery or pelvic radiation therapy
- Current chemotherapy or radiation therapy for malignancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Laparoscopic Obturator Urethropexy
Suspending the periurethral vaginal tissue to the obturator internus fascia bilaterally via sutures, creating a support for the bladder neck compartment
|
Suspending the periurethral vaginal tissue to the obturator internus fascia bilaterally via sutures, creating a support for the bladder neck compartment.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Burch Urethropexy
Suspending the periurethral vaginal tissue to Cooper's ligament bilaterally via sutures, creating a support for the bladder neck compartment
|
Suspending the periurethral vaginal tissue to Cooper's ligament bilaterally via sutures, creating a support for the bladder neck compartment
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Continence Rates
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Patient reported symptoms of incontinence
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Objective continence rates
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
|
Objective continence rates will be assessed with a cough test and a one-hour pad test.
|
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
|
|
Perioperative and postoperative complications
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
|
Perioperative and postoperative complications will be assessed using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification.
|
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
|
|
Urinary retention
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
|
Urinary retention will be assessed by an elevated post-void residual urine
|
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
|
|
Recurrent urinary tract infection
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
|
Recurrent urinary tract infection will be assessed through a urine culture
|
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
|
|
Recurrent/persistent/de novo urgency
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
|
Recurrent/persistent/de novo urgency will be based on patient symptoms
|
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
|
|
Recurrent SUI
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
|
Recurrent SUI will be assessed through a cough test/a one-hour pad test
|
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
|
|
Sexual function
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
|
Using the Female Sexual Function Index-6 (FSFI-6).
|
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
|
|
Overall quality of life
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
|
Using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20).
|
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 10 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 19-0210-A
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stress Urinary Incontinence
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); Stanford...CompletedUrinary Incontinence, Stress | Urge Incontinence | Urinary Stress Incontinence | Stress Incontinence, Urinary | Stress Incontinence | Stress Incontinence, Female | Urgency UrinaryUnited States
-
Juna d.o.o.CompletedFemale Stress Urinary Incontinence | Mixed Incontinence, Urge and Stress
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalRecruitingWomen With Stress Urinary IncontinenceTaiwan
-
Université de SherbrookeRecruitingUrinary Incontinence | Urinary Stress Incontinence | Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence | Stress Incontinence, MaleCanada
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompletedUrinary Stress Incontinence (SI)Israel
-
University Magna GraeciaUnknownStress Urinary IncontinenceItaly
-
University of California, IrvineWithdrawnStress Urinary IncontinenceUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyBoehringer IngelheimCompleted
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyBoehringer IngelheimCompletedUrinary Stress IncontinenceUnited States
-
GT Urological, LLCCompletedMale Stress Urinary IncontinenceAustralia, Czechia, New Zealand
Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Obturator Urethropexy
-
Theodor Bilharz Research InstituteActive, not recruitingFemale Stress Urinary IncontinenceEgypt
-
NorthShore University HealthSystemActive, not recruitingMesh-free Suture Urethropexy for Treating Stress Urinary Incontinence, Efficacy and Durability TrialStress Urinary IncontinenceUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child...CompletedUrinary Incontinence, Stress | Uterine Prolapse | Vaginal ProlapseUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Fatma mahannaRecruitingMaxillary Defect ReconstructionEgypt
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedPatient SatisfactionEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedPatient SatisfactionEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityRecruiting
-
Mayo ClinicSpectrum Health Hospitals; Saint Luke's Health SystemCompletedUrinary IncontinenceUnited States