- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04141566
Pseudo Continent Perineal Colostomy vs Permanent Left Iliac Colostomy After Abdominoperineal Resection for Ultra Low Rectal Adenocarcinoma
Pseudo Continent Perineal Colostomy vs Permanent Left Iliac Colostomy After Abdominoperineal Resection for Ultra Low Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Comparaison of Out of Pocket Costs, Hospital Bills and Quality of Life
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The surgical treatment of ultra low rectal adenocarcinoma has known great changes, yet the abdominoperineal resection (APR) is still indicated in over 20% of these cases.
A permanent left abdominal stoma is the standard salvage technique.
The pseudo continent perineal colostomy (PCPC) is an alternative technique especially in low income countries where the stoma bag and stoma care is not covered by health insurances.
Furthermore, this technique allows the conservation of body image, which is frequently requested by muslim patients whenever it is possible.
The aim of this study is to compare the cost effectiveness of both techniques as well as the quality of life of patients in the 6 first months following the surgery.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Rabat, Morocco
- National Institut of Oncology, Surgical oncology department
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
All patients who underwent an abdominoperineal resection for ultra low rectal cancer with the creation of a definitive iliac colostomy or a pseudo continent perineal colostomy.
The following informations will be collected : age, gender, type of stoma,operative aspects, postoperative morbidity according to Clavien score, out of pocket costs and out of pocket hospital bills, quality of life at 6 months after surgery according to EORTC 30 and CR29 QOL
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients of 18 years old or above
- Abdominoperineal resection for ultra low rectal cancer
- Creation of a definitive iliac colostomy or a pseudo continent perineal colostomy
- Patients willing to participate to this study (writting consent)
Exclusion Criteria:
-Patients unable to respond to the Quality Of Life questionnaires
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
PCPC
pseudocontinent perineal colostomy using shmidt technique for perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection
|
The procedure is performed in 2stages: as a usual APR starting by a laparoscopic approach esnsuring a complete mesorectal excision,then a perineal approach ensuring an extended excision of the entire internal and external sphincter complex, allowing the excision of the specimen. 8to10cm of tof the colon is resected and harvested as a free graft, stripped of its meso and epiploics , then from its mucosa and placed in an antibiotic solution for 10min. This graft is wrapped snugly around the end of the colon 2-3 cm from its distal end for 1 and a half round. Absorbable 3.0 Sutures are taken to hold it in place. The end of the colon is brought out as a stoma in the perineum. Colonic irrigations are started from the third day according to the protocol previously reported. Patients and one of their family members are daily educated and assisted while performing colonic irrigations by specialized nurses. |
PLIC
Permanenet left iliac colostomy , the standard technique after abdominoperineal resection and primary closure of the perineal wound
|
After a usual laparoscopic APR, the perineal wound is closed and a permanent left iliac colostomy is performed
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Cost of management of both stoma types
Time Frame: 180 days from surgery
|
defined by out of pocket costs during the first 6 months following the surgery in euros
|
180 days from surgery
|
Costs of hospital stay
Time Frame: 180 days from surgery
|
defined as Out of pocket hospital bills in euros for all of the admission and the readmissions for surgical complication management
|
180 days from surgery
|
Globcal Quality of life of patients with PCPC and PLIC
Time Frame: 180 days from surgery
|
using the EORTC C30 Quality Of Life questionnaires
|
180 days from surgery
|
Specific Quality of life of patients with PCPC and PLIC
Time Frame: 180 days from surgery
|
using the EORTC CR29 Quality Of Life questionnaires
|
180 days from surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
90 day morbidity and mortality rate
Time Frame: 90 days from surgery
|
defined by the Clavien Dindo rated from I to V at 90 post operative day.
|
90 days from surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Souadka A, Majbar MA, Amrani L, Souadka A. Perineal pseudocontinent colostomy for ultra-low rectal adenocarcinoma: the muscular graft as a pseudosphincter. Acta Chir Belg. 2016 Oct;116(5):278-281. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2016.1174020. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
- Souadka A, Majbar MA, El Harroudi T, Benkabbou A, Souadka A. Perineal pseudocontinent colostomy is safe and efficient technique for perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. BMC Surg. 2015 Apr 10;15:40. doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0027-z.
- Souadka A, Majbar MA, Bougutab A, El Othmany A, Jalil A, Ahyoud FZ, El Malki HO, Souadka A. Risk factors of poor functional results at 1-year after pseudocontinent perineal colostomy for ultralow rectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Oct;56(10):1143-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31829f8cd5.
- Dumont F, Souadka A, Goere D, Lasser P, Elias D. Impact of perineal pseudocontinent colostomy on perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection. J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;105(7):628-31. doi: 10.1002/jso.22105. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
- Dumont F, Ayadi M, Goere D, Honore C, Elias D. Comparison of fecal continence and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and abdominoperineal resection plus perineal colostomy for ultra-low rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep;108(4):225-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.23379. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Digestive System Diseases
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Carcinoma
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
- Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
- Digestive System Neoplasms
- Gastrointestinal Diseases
- Intestinal Diseases
- Intestinal Neoplasms
- Rectal Diseases
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Adenocarcinoma
- Rectal Neoplasms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PCPC_PLIC
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownImproving Quality of LifeEgypt
-
B. Braun Medical SAUnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
Children's National Research InstituteRecruitingProfessional Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity of BolognaRecruitingImprove Quality of LifeItaly
-
Mattu UniversityCompletedBreif Description: Patients' Quality of Life ofEthiopia
-
University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)RecruitingHealth Related Quality of LifeUnited States
-
PharmanexSprim Advanced Life SciencesCompletedHealth-related Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Linkoeping UniversityRecruiting
-
South Valley UniversityActive, not recruitingDeterminants of Health-related Quality of Life for Patients After Renal Lithotripsy: PNL Versus RIRSHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Region VästmanlandUnknownHealth Related Quality of Life
Clinical Trials on Perineal pseudocontinent colostomy
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesCompletedParastomal HerniaFrance
-
Zhejiang UniversityTerminated
-
Kantonsspital Winterthur KSWCompletedUrinary Incontinence, StressSwitzerland
-
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip FakultesiCompleted
-
Fudan UniversityRecruitingColorectal Cancer | Colorectal Neoplasms Malignant | Intestinal Neoplasms, MalignantChina
-
Cheng-Hsin General HospitalNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health SciencesRecruiting
-
Oslo University HospitalCompleted
-
Namik Kemal UniversityCompleted
-
Umeå UniversitySundsvall Hospital; Sunderby Hospital; Östersund HospitalRecruiting