Marsupialization of Anal Fistulotomy Wound Accelerates Healing and Decreases Post Operative Pain

November 6, 2019 updated by: Hazem Nour Abdellatif, Zagazig University

Fistulotomy Versus Fistulotomy With Marsupialization of Wound Edges in Simple Perianal Fistula, a Comparative Clinical Trial

comparison between to groups of patients with simple anal fistula one group underwent sistulotomy the other underwent fistulotomy and marsupialization of the wound edges , the investigator tested the incidence of postoperative complications , time of wound healing , operative time

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This randomized controlled trial was carried in the period between May 2018 and April 2019, on 70 patients undergoing fistulotomy for treatment of simple perianal fistula. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups each 35 patients, group A; underwent fistulotomy without marsupialization of the edges of fistulotomy wound. And group B; underwent fistulotomy with marsupialization of the wound edges.

Patients included in this study are those suffering simple non recurrent perianal fistula with ASA I and II.

the investigator excluded patients with secondary anal fistula, complex fistula, anal incontinence, previous anal surgery and any disease or drug that affects wound healing.

All patients were subjected to thorough history taking and careful anal examination to assess the sphincter integrity, define the fistulous track and internal opening, endo anal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging was ordered when needed.

Fistulotomy was done under spinal anesthesia in the lithotomy position after skin preparation and patient draping; anal examination under anesthesia was done, identification of the internal opening carried out using palpation and inspection using proctoscope, injection of hydrogen peroxide in the external opening done if internal opening couldn't be defined easily, then the fistulous track was probed, it was laid open using diathermy, in group B the wounds was marsupialized by suturing the skin edges to the edges of the track floor using absorbable sutures (polygalactin) 3\0. Figures (1) and (2) shows the probed fistulous track and its' wound after marsupialization.

Postoperative non adherent dressing impregnated with local anesthetic cream was applied to the wound.

Nonsteroidal analgesic injection was given in injection form as per need. Follow up was carried out in outpatient clinic by the study surgeons, patients who agreed for participation in the study was instructed to visit the clinic every week for the first three post-operative months then every month for the next 3 months and lastly two visits after 3 and 6 months, the attending surgeon records follow up data including status of wound healing, anal continence and fistula recurrence.

An informed written consent was taken from all study participants. Randomization was done using computer program. The study was approved from institutional review board and the ethical committee from our university.

Demographic data, operative data, and postoperative data including pain, post-operative complications and time taken for complete wound healing were collected, properly analyzed using the paired t test and Z test using SPSS program.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sharqya
      • Zagazig, Sharqya, Egypt, 44519
        • Zagazig Faculty of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Simple non recurrent perianal fistula with ASA I and II.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • secondary anal fistula,
  • complex fistula,
  • anal incontinence,
  • previous anal surgery
  • Any disease or drug that affects wound healing.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: group A fistulotomy group
35 patients with simple anal fistula subjected to fistulotomy
after defining the fistulous track it was laid open (marsupialization)
Active Comparator: group B marsupialization group
35 patients with simple anal fistula subjected to fistulotomy and marsupialization of fistulotomy wound
after defining the fistulous track it was laid open (marsupialization) was done together with marsupialization of the wound edge with vicryl 3\0 sutures

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
operative time in minutes
Time Frame: intraoperative
the time taken for completion of the procedure from fistulous track identification to the end of fistulotomy or marsupialization
intraoperative
postoperative pain using visual analogue scale
Time Frame: 1 week
pain in the postoperative period
1 week
postoperative complications measured by clinical examination and anal sphincter manometry
Time Frame: 1 year
examination of the patient for fistula recurrence, history, clinical examination and anal sphincter manometry for anal incontinence
1 year
wound healing time
Time Frame: 1 year
time taken for wound to be completely healed
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anal Fistula

Clinical Trials on fistulotomy

Subscribe