Oral Prednisolone Effect on Cancer WHO Stepladder Analgesia Protocol

March 9, 2020 updated by: Mohamed Abd Latif Ghanim, Mansoura University

Effect of Salutatory Oral Prednisolone Dosing on Cancer Pain WHO Stepladder Analgesic Drug Protocol

Introduction; World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder; Step I recommends non-opioid analgesics for mild pain. Step II specifies the use of weak opioids for moderate pain. Step III comprises the use of strong opioids for severe pain. Cancer pain management using opioids administered alone or in combination with adjuvant analgesics. Corticosteroids adjuvant use for neuropathic and bone pain treatment. However, despite widespread use of corticosteroids, scientific evidence about its efficacy in cancer pain management is limited. This protocol aims to clarify pors and cons of interrupted steroid dosing in chronic cancer pain WHO stepladder analgesia protocol. Methods; Prospective quizi-pre-post experimental study will be conducted after IRB approval in the Mansoura oncology canter pain clinic-Faculty of medicine Mansoura University Egypt. Verbal informed consent will be obtained from the respondents (patients) for the interview. Furthermore, the data collected from each patient will be kept confidential and used strictly only for the purpose of the study.

Patients will be allocated as single group and will take oral prednisolone (sulopride10 mg) single dose every two days for 4 successive weeks then the next two weeks as washout period (stop dosing gradually by taking 5 mgs for 3 successive dosing every 2nd day over a week, then stop the oral steroid drug totally over the 2nd week of the washout period. The second period of the study will start by taking the oral prednisolone (sulopride10 mg) every fourth day for the next 4 weeks after which the patient will get another washout two weeks period (stop dosing gradually 5 mgs for 3 successive dosing every 4th day then stop the drug totally).A questionnaire-based interview using Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) (16) based on VAS pain score as a rough tool for pain intensity Data collection: Primary Outcome: global Pain intensity, assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-10. Secondary outcomes based on the Brief Pain Inventory short form (BPI-sf).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Introduction: pain in cancer patients is based on the concept of the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder and was recently updated with the EAPC (European Association for Palliative Care) recommendations. (1) Cancer pain management using opioids administered alone or in combination with adjuvant analgesics. Spinal cord compression, superior vena cava obstruction, raised intracranial pressure, and bowel obstruction is better established than in other nonspecific indications Corticosteroids adjuvant use for neuropathic and bone pain treatment. However, despite widespread use of corticosteroids, scientific evidence about its efficacy in cancer pain management is limited. According to the cancer Pain Management Index (PMI) (2), approximately one-third of patients do not receive appropriate analgesia proportional to their pain intensity (PI). This protocol aims to clarify pors and cons of interrupted steroid dosing in chronic cancer pain WHO stepladder analgesia protocol.

World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder; Step I recommends non-opioid analgesics for mild pain. Step II specifies the use of weak opioids for moderate pain. Step III comprises the use of strong opioids for severe pain (4). Recently the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommendations (5, 6). Nociceptive and neuropathic components of cancer pain responsiveness to opioids is necessary to achieve good pain alleviation. Medical data demonstrate that complete pain relief is rarely achieved in cancer patients; nonetheless, it can be significantly reduced (7). However, some authors have suggested eliminating the second step of the analgesic ladder, with weak opioids being replaced with low doses of oral morphine (8, 9).

Inadequate assessment leads to inadequate management of cancer pain. Brief Pain Inventory (PI), a pain assessment tool that measures both the intensity of the pain (sensory dimension) and the interference of cancer pain in the patient's life (reactive dimension). It also queries the patient about pain relief, pain quality, and patient perception of the cause of pain. (10) The Pain Management Index (PMI) is widely used in the assessment of pain management, and negative scores are traditionally considered to indicate inadequate pain management. PMI scores are inversely associated with the proportion of patients with pain interference (PI). However, PMI scores of - 1 do not always indicate inadequate pain management; pain management should, therefore, be evaluated from multiple perspectives.

Hypothalamic-pituitary-Adrenal Axis (HPA) axis, sudden cessation of corticosteroid therapy may result in adrenal failure. Clinically significant HPA axis suppression is rare if a steroid is administered for less than 3 weeks (11). Steroid withdrawal syndromes: Relapse of the disease, symptoms of steroid withdrawal syndrome such as lethargy, depression, anorexia, nausea, myalgia, or arthralgia (12). Steroid Tapering: The most suitable method of tapering has not been established as yet. After the glucocorticoid withdrawal, the hypothalamic and pituitary functions recover first, followed by the adrenocortical function. Full recovery of adrenal function can take months, or even up to a year (13), especially after prolonged steroid treatment with high doses. A possible scheme of steroid discontinuation is Prednisolone or equivalent daily dose≥ 7.5 mg reduce rapidly 2.5 mg every 3-4 days, then 5-7.5 mg reduce by 1 mg every 2-4 weeks, then < 5 mg Reduce by 1 mg every 2-4 weeks (13).

Prednisolone relative biologic potencies are; Salt retention 0.75, Anti-inflammatory effect 3, and HPA axis suppression 4. Nociception consists of four stages: Transduction (in peripheral nociceptors), transmission (via neurons), modulation, and pain perception. The possible role of steroids on every step of remain unclear; Reduction in inflammation decreases nociceptors activation (14) , inhibit the expression of collagenase, reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines, stimulate the synthesis of lipocortin (15), reduction of peritumoral edema leads to the improvement in analgesia in brain metastases (16) and spinal cord compression (17) , Decrease of spontaneous discharge & reduce neuropathic pain, Modulate neural activity and plasticity. There has been little evidence for this in the literature with cancer-induced pain, nausea, and vomiting, fatigue, cancer-induced anorexia-cachexia, depressed mood, or poor general well-being and dyspnea. (18)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dakahlia
      • Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt, 35516
        • Oncolgy Center, Mansoura University,

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Patients will be considered eligible if they fulfill the following criteria: age≥ 18 years old; diagnosed with any type of cancer: on regular visits every 14 days to the Mansoura oncology center pain clinic.

Exclusion Criteria:

patients with severe other medical disease (organ failure-uncontrolled DM-uncontrolled Hypertension) or psychiatric problems and unable or unwilling to provide the required information will be excluded from the study, patients on chemotherapy or radiotherapy during the study period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Prospective quizi-pre-post oral predensolone
single group and will take oral prednisolone (sulopride10 mg) single dose every two days for 4 successive weeks then the next two weeks as washout period (stop dosing gradually by taking 5 mgs for 3 successive dosing every 2nd day over a week, then stop the oral steroid drug totally over the 2nd week of the washout period. The second period of the study will start by taking the oral prednisolone (sulopride10 mg) every fourth day for the next 4 weeks after which the patient will get another washout two weeks period (stop dosing gradually 5 mgs for 3 successive dosing every 4th day then stop the drug totally).
Patients will be allocated as single group and will take oral prednisolone (sulopride10 mg) single dose every two days for 4 successive weeks then the next two weeks as washout period (stop dosing gradually by taking 5 mgs for 3 successive dosing every 2nd day over a week, then stop the oral steroid drug totally over the 2nd week of the washout period. The second period of the study will start by taking the oral prednisolone (sulopride10 mg) every fourth day for the next 4 weeks after which the patient will get another washout two weeks period (stop dosing gradually 5 mg for 3 successive dosing every 4th day then stop the drug totally).
Other Names:
  • oral adjuvant analgesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity: visual analogue scale
Time Frame: from day one to day 28
global Pain intensity, assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-10.
from day one to day 28

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: mohamed Ghanem, A professor, Mansoura Univeristy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R.19.10.656.R1

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Steroid Anlgesia in Cancer Pain

Clinical Trials on Oral tablet

3
Subscribe