Muscle Dysfunction in Patients With Hematological Diseases Referred to Stem Cell Transplant

April 10, 2024 updated by: Jan Christensen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

The Effect of Medical Treatment on Muscle Dysfunction and the Prognostic Role of Muscle Dysfunction at Critical Decision Points in Patients With Hematological Diseases Referred to Myeloablative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT), to Myeloablative HSCT With a "Reduced Toxicity Conditioning" Regime With Fludarabine and Treosulfane (FluTreo), or to Non-myeloablative HSCT. - A Prospective Observational Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of the disease and HSCT on muscle dysfunction and to investigate the prognostic role of muscle dysfunction at critical decision points in patients with hematological diseases referred to hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

HSCT: Patients diagnosed with malignant hematological diseases who are referred to myeloablative HSCT, to a myeloablative "reduced toxicity conditioning" regime with Fludarabine and Treosulfane (FluTreo) or to non-myeloablative HSCT.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

RATIONAL: Patients diagnosed with malignant hematological diseases undergoing HSCT are faced with poor prognosis. The treatment is demanding and associated with severe deconditioning potentially leading to worse prognostic outcomes. To what extend patients body composition at the point of referral to HSCT, as well as changes in body composition throughout the cancer continuum is associated with cancer outcomes is currently not well described, specifically if this should be part of standard clinical evaluation in order to optimize therapy-efficacy. Recent findings suggest that pathophysiological alterations in skeletal muscle mass and function can have significant implications for the risk of disease progression and long term prognosis.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

144

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Recruiting
        • Rigshospitalet
        • Contact:
          • Jan Christensen, PhD
        • Contact:
          • Nina Høgdal, MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with malignant hematological diseases referred to myeloablative HSCT, myeloablative RTC-HSCT or non-myeloablative HSCT.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML), acute lymphatic leukaemia (ALL), chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic lymphatic leukaemia (CLL), malignant lymphomas or multiple myeloma (MM) referred to myeloablative HSCT, myeloablative RTC-HSCT or non-myeloablative HSCT at the Department of Haematology, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age <18; pregnancy; physical or mental disabilities precluding test of muscle function; inability to read and understand Danish

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cohort 1 - Patients referred to myeloablative HSCT
These patients will undergo 5 assessments: a baseline-assessment 3-4 week prior to conditioning treatment, at discharge (in-patients) or at day +28 after stem cell infusion (out-patients) and follow-up assessments at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months.
No intervention
Cohort 2 - Patients referred to non myeloablative HSCT
These patients will undergo 5 assessments: a baseline-assessment 3-4 week prior to conditioning treatment, at discharge (in-patients) or at day +28 after stem cell infusion (out-patients) and follow-up assessments at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months.
No intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 Medical treatment complications
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Incidens rate of medical complications (mortality, re-hospitalization, infections, all cause disease relapse, chronic GVHD, return to work)
From baseline to 1 year follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospitalization duration
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Total number days in hospital
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Disease free survival
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Risk of disease progression
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Overall survival
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Risk of mortality from any-cause
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Change in whole body lean mass
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Change in appendicular lean mass
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Change in whole body fat percentage
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Change in visceral fat mass
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Change in bone mineral density
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Change in bone mineral content
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Change in walking capacity
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Maximum 10 meter walking speed
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Change in lower body physical function
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
30 seconds Sit-To- Stand test
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Change in maximum leg power
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Leg extensor power test
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Change in inflammation markers
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Blood values are registered from the patients hospital record in relation to assessments. C-reactive protein (CRP) and leucocytes are registered as they are inflammation markers
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Change in creatinine and hemoglobin
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Blood values are registered from the patients hospital record in relation to assessments. C-reactive protein (CRP) and leucocytes are registered as they have an influence on muscle strength
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Change in body fat percentage, fat mass, fat-free mass, muscle mass and bone mass and total body water
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Change in health related quality of life
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 Version 3.0)
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Change in psychological distress
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Change in sleep quality
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire
From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Change in physical activity level
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) short form
From baseline to 1 year follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jan Christensen, post doc, Department of Occupational- and Physiotherapy, Rigshospitalet

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Not provided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on No intervention

3
Subscribe