The Effect of Split-belt Treadmill Training on Gait in Parkinson's Disease

The Impact of Split-belt Treadmill Training to Modulate Freezing-related Gait Deficits and Freezing Episodes in Parkinson's Disease

People with Parkinson's disease (PD) often show gait impairments such as, shuffling gait, short steps and gait asymmetry and irregularity. These gait problems are already apparent in the early disease stages, having an immense effect on daily life functioning. Especially Freezing of Gait (FOG), where the patients are not able to initiate or continue their movement despite their intention to do so, is a debilitating problem. It is thought that lack of gait adaptability could be an underlying cause of FOG. With a split-belt treadmill the speed of both legs can be controlled independently, which forces participants to actively adapt their gait to the new situation. In a previous study performed at our lab, it was shown that only one session of split-belt training (SBT), in which the speed of one leg was reduced, improved gait adaptability and other gait features compared to tied-belt training (TBT). Furthermore, overground turning speed improved after only one single training session and this was even retained 24 hours later, indicating training induced long-term potentiation. Since the short-term effects of SBT are promising, the objective of this study is to investigate if 4 weeks of SBT, 3 times a week, has an effect on gait deficits found in individuals with PD, compared to 4-weeks, 3 times a week, of TBT.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Parkinson Disease; Freezing of Gait
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: SBT; Behavioral: TBT

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 52
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Belgium
  • Vlaams-Brabant
    • Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium, 3001
      • KU Leuven
• Germany
  • Schleswig-Holstein
    • Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 24105
      • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Child; Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Clinical diagnosis of PD according to the recent criteria of the Movement Disorders Society made by a neurologist
2. Participants should be able to walk 5 minutes at a stretch without a walking aid
3. Hoehn & Yahr stage II or III in the ON state of medication
4. Mini Mental State Examination score of 24 or above
5. Participants should have a steady medication schedule at the start of the study (no change in the past month).
6. To be included as a freezer participant a score of at least 1 or higher should be recorded with the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Current enrollment in another clinical study which may interfere with the conduction of this study.
2. Orthopedic injuries or other musculoskeletal problems, which could possibly effect balance and/or gait.
3. Unable or unwilling to commit to 4 weeks of training, 3 times a week
4. Participation in walking training in the month prior to the start of the study
5. Other neurological impairments (except PD)
6. Cardiovascular exercise risk factors diagnosed by a doctor

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SBT; The SBT group will receive a 4-week split-belt treadmill training program consisting of 3 training sessions every week. The training will have a progression of training duration over the four weeks. Participants will start at a total training duration of 30 minutes and this will be increased with 5 minutes every week. The maximal length will be 45 minutes of training. One session including breaks will take approximately 1 hour.	Behavioral: SBT; The SBT group will receive a 4-week split-belt treadmill training, 3 times a week using a standardized progression protocol. The sessions, including breaks, will approximately take 1 hour each. The training will be given by a trainer experienced with PD.
Active Comparator: TBT; The TBT group will receive a 4-week tied-belt treadmill training program consisting of 3 training sessions every week. The training will have a progression of training duration over the four weeks. Participants will start at a total training duration of 30 minutes and this will be increased with 5 minutes every week. The maximal length will be 45 minutes of training. One session including breaks will take approximately 1 hour.	Behavioral: TBT; The TBT group will receive a 4-week tied-belt treadmill training, 3 times a week. To make sure exposure of the two interventions is similar the sessions of the TBT group will be of similar length and progression level (approximately 1 hour each). The training will be given by a trainer experienced with PD.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Average overground 360 degree turning speed (degrees/s)	Participants will be instructed to turn 360 degrees in alternating directions (clockwise/counterclockwise) for 60 seconds. The instruction is to turn as quickly as possible, while still feeling safe doing this. The average overground turning speed will be determined by the use of APDM Opal accelerometers which will be worn on both feet, wrists and the lower back.	Change in performance between the average overground turning speed from pre to post intervention (i.e. the week after the 4-week training period ended)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Average dual task overground 360 degree turning speed (degrees/sec)	Participants will be instructed to turn 360 degrees in alternating directions (clockwise/counterclockwise) for 60 seconds. The instruction is to turn as quickly as possible, while still feeling safe doing this. The average overground turning speed will be determined by the use of APDM Opal accelerometers which will be worn on both feet, wrists and the lower back. In addition to this task the participants also have to perform an auditory stroop task. The participant hears the words 'low' and 'high' in either a low or high pitch in random order and timing. The participant has to respond as quickly as possible to the pitch of the word and not to the word itself.	Change in performance between the average overground turning speed from pre to post intervention (i.e. the week after the 4-week training period ended)
Retention of average overground 360 degree turning speed (degrees/sec)	Participants will be instructed to turn 360 degrees in alternating directions (clockwise/counterclockwise) for 60 seconds. The instruction is to turn as quickly as possible, while still feeling safe doing this. The average overground turning speed will be determined by the use of APDM Opal accelerometers which will be worn on both feet, wrists and the lower back.	Change in performance from post-intervention 1 week after the 4-week training period ended (Retest 1) to retention, 5 weeks later (Retest 2).
Retention of dual task average overground 360 degree turning speed (degrees/sec)	Participants will be instructed to turn 360 degrees in alternating directions (clockwise/counterclockwise) for 60 seconds. The instruction is to turn as quickly as possible, while still feeling safe doing this. The average overground turning speed will be determined by the use of APDM Opal accelerometers which will be worn on both feet, wrists and the lower back. In addition to this task the participants also have to perform an auditory stroop task. The participant hears the words 'low' and 'high' in either a low or high pitch in random order and timing. The participant has to respond as quickly as possible to the pitch of the word and not to the word itself.	Change in performance from post-intervention 1 week after the 4-week training period ended (Retest 1) to retention, 5 weeks later (Retest 2).

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: KU Leuven
• Collaborators: University of Kiel
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Christian Schlenstedt, PhD, Christian Albrechts University of Kiel

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Seuthe J, D'Cruz N, Ginis P, Weisser B, Berg D, Deuschl G, Nieuwboer A, Schlenstedt C. Split-belt treadmill walking in patients with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review. Gait Posture. 2019 Mar;69:187-194. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.01.032. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): August 12, 2019
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 11, 2021
• Study Completion (Actual): May 11, 2021

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 16, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 21, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): November 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): August 10, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 9, 2021
• Last Verified: August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Rehabilitation; Parkinson Disease; Freezing of Gait; Treadmill training; Gait adaptation; Split-belt
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Parkinsonian Disorders; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Movement Disorders; Synucleinopathies; Neurodegenerative Diseases; Parkinson Disease
• Other Study ID Numbers: S62825 (KUL); D454/13 (CAU); None was given (Other Grant/Funding Number: Jacques and Gloria Gossweiler Foundation)

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No