Mindfulness, Empathy and Social Integration. Its Relation With Chonic Stress

November 25, 2019 updated by: Paola D'Adamo, National Council of Scientific and Technical Research, Argentina

Learning Mindfulness Based Practices, Empathy and Pro-social Behavior in the Educational Field: Its Influence on Health and Interpersonal Relationships

The objective of this project is to evaluate the effects of promoting the learning of empathy and pro-social behavior in health and interpersonal relationships in middle-aged children It has been shown that pro-social behavior can decrease chronic stress levels and improve the response of the immune system and the autonomic nervous system. This behavior, which includes a wide variety of actions such as helping, sharing, comforting, informing, emerges early in ontogeny and is closely related to empathic processes. Finding ways to teach how to develop empathy and perspective could contribute to favor interpersonal relationships and health in the school environment, articulating aspects of basic science and applied science. The project not only aims to deepen theoretical aspects of chornic stress, empathy and pro-sociality, but also to develop concrete tools that diminsh chronic stress and foster empathic and cooperative attitudes in the school environment, thus contributing to individual and collective well-being.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The study will be carried out in primary educational establishments. In the experimental group, the proposed intervention will be conducted during the school year. The control group, with similar characteristics, will carry out regular curricular activities.

Informative talks will be given to parents of potential participants, teachers and managers of educational establishments, in order to inform about research objectives and methodology. The nature of voluntary participation in any of the activities and procedures, as well as the confidential treatment of the information will be duly clarified. Informed consent will be requested from parents if they agree to participate in the project.

The intervention program will consist of a weekly meeting of approximately 1 hour during the school year, and will be conducted by the researchers together with the teacher in charge of the group. This program will include practices that promote self-perception, interoception and collaborative activities, followed by an instance of group reflection that promotes perspective taking (as in Lozada et al 2017).

The practices of self-perception and interoception consist, for example, in focusing attention on breathing for a period of time that will gradually increase (mindfulness). During collaborative actions, children will carry out activities in dyads or in small groups that promote empathy and pro-social behavior. The last activity of the intervention will consist of an instance of group reflection in which experiences and perceptions of the participants will be shared in order to favor perspective taking (i.e. the cognitive ability to consider the world from the point of view of the other).

The variables (pro-social behavior and hair cortisol levels) are quantified at the beginning and at the end of each intervention (ie, pre and post-test evaluation). To assess the differences in each group, pre-post levels will be compared by means of the paired t test, and comparisons between the experimental and control groups will be made by means of variance analysis tests and Mann Withney tests and Kruskal Wallis.

Children participating in the experimental and control groups will be individually evaluated using the following methods:

3) Sociometric questionnaire.

Stress levels are quantified through:

1) Hair cortisol dosing. This parameter is an indicator of chronic stress whose advantage is that it does not show marked variability throughout the day such as salivary cortisol. For this, it is necessary to cut a small strand of hair that will be analyzed later by Pharmacy and Biochemistry researchers from the University of Buenos Aires.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rio Negro
      • Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina, 8400
        • Paola

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 9 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants having good general health

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children who were taking medication
  • Children that were present to less than the 80% of the intervention encounters
  • Children who were not present at the pre and post measurements points

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
The experimental group is the one that participates in the intervention

The behavioral intervention was carried out once a week during 60 minutes from May to November, and included mindfulness-based practices sought to foster self-awareness, and dyadic activities sought to awakening subtle perception of the other.

Group activities, which entailed more than two participants, were also conducted to foster empathic collaboration and prosocialness. Diverse collaborative games were carried out in which mutual help was needed for achieving shared goals in an amusing way .

Perspective-taking was encouraged within the group, by sharing each participant's experience, which included expressing how each child had felt (i.e., if neglected, ignored or cared for) and whether they had enjoyed helping their peers or no.

Other Names:
  • Self-awareness practices, and other oriented awareness practicess
No Intervention: Control group
The control group belonged to the same school but did not participate in the intervention. Instead, they continued with regular curricular classes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline hair cortisol levels
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 9 months
change form baseline hair cortisol levels at 9 months
through study completion, an average of 9 months
change from baseline sociogram levels
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 9 months
Children are asked to say which classmates they would choose as playmates and which ones they would not. The sociogram is completed previous to and after the intervention in both groups. The changes in the number of peers selected (i.e., positive elections) and rejected (i.e., negative elections) reflect changes in the pattern of social relationships of each child. Therefore, if positive elections increase and /or negative elections decrease, social integration improves
through study completion, an average of 9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paola D'Adamo, PhD, National Council of Scientific and Technical Research, Argentina

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 23, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CONICET

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Stress Disorder

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness-based intervention

Subscribe