Consortium to Disseminate and Understand Implementation of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (CONDUIT)

October 23, 2025 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Consortium to Disseminate and Understand Implementation of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (PII 19-321)

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a major cause of illness and death among Veterans for which effective treatment is a major priority of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Expanding access to alternatives to opioid medications for chronic pain management is also a leading priority. Effective medications for OUD (MOUD) are available, but their availability and use among Veterans varies across VHA. The aims of this study are to pull together the efforts of six individual pilot projects into a single project. The purpose of combining the projects is to maximize the value of the individual projects to VHA and to provide information to guide strategies to increase access and use of MOUD and alternative therapies for pain in VHA nationally. The researchers leading the individual projects will make use of their partnerships with Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) leaders in order to develop a combined effort toward increased dissemination and use of MOUD that spans 9 VISNs and 63 sites.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among Veterans and a high-priority target for quality improvement in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Effective medications for OUD (MOUD) are available but uptake of them has been highly variable across VHA. Additionally, VHA has been at the forefront in the U.S. in promoting alternative therapies for pain, but these are not consistently available to Veterans in great need of them: those with chronic pain and harmful opioid use. VHA, through its Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, has made access to MOUD for all Veterans who need it a system-wide priority. However, successful implementation of complex care processes that face myriad barriers requires intentional, structured, evidence-based implementation efforts carried out by expert teams in close partnership with local leadership.

As such, the overarching goal of this project - the Consortium to Disseminate and Understand Implementation of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (CONDUIT) -- is to unite six inter-related VISN/QUERI pilot Partnered Implementation Initiative projects in a concerted effort to improve access to MOUD among Veterans with OUD and access to alternative therapies for pain in 63 VHA sites spanning nine VISNs. CONDUIT will span four critical care settings in the OUD continuum of care: Primary Care; Specialty Care; Acute Care (inpatient and Emergency Department); and Telehealth. These efforts will be connected by Veteran Engagement, Implementation, and Quantitative/Economic Cores that will help CONDUIT teams harmonize on metrics, processes and outcomes. There will also be a Strategic Advisory Group composed of Operations leaders and Veterans that will help CONDUIT remain maximally aligned with VHA and Veteran priorities. CONDUIT will also offer sites the opportunity to implement new evidence-based practices (i.e. ones that were not part of initial launch) in the latter half of the project period.

The methods deployed by each of the CONDUIT teams will be similar: expert "external facilitation" teams will lead partnered "internal facilitation" teams at local sites in a process called "Implementation Facilitation (IF)" - a multi-component suite of tools aimed to help the sites effectively adopt evidence-based practices. The six projects piloted and systematically modified IF strategies in Phase 1 and now propose to disseminate those sharpened strategies on a national scale over the next three years, including new VISNs and dozens of additional sites. In terms of evaluation, CONDUIT will use well-established formative evaluation methods to assess the effectiveness of and to drive refinements to the IF strategies. Additionally, CONDUIT will use cutting edge quantitative methods to assess the impact the work on important clinical targets and to assess the value of the work in terms of costs vs. benefits. Throughout the project period, teams will develop and refine products such as patient and provider educational materials, prescribing and communication guides, and clinic operations manuals. These evaluation and product development efforts will prime successful scale-up and dissemination efforts throughout VHA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL
    • California
      • West Los Angeles, California, United States, 90073
        • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO
    • Connecticut
      • West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516-2770
        • VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT
    • Idaho
      • Boise, Idaho, United States, 83702
        • Boise VA Medical Center, Boise, ID
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52246-2208
        • Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA
    • Maine
      • Augusta, Maine, United States, 04330
        • Maine VA Medical Center, Augusta, ME
    • Massachusetts
      • Leeds, Massachusetts, United States, 01053-9764
        • VA Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System, Leeds, MA
    • South Carolina
      • Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29209
        • Wm. Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Medical Center, Columbia, SC
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84148
        • VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98108
        • VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-All Veterans on prescribed opioid treatment and/or with opioid use disorder who are enrolled at participating implementation sites.

Exclusion Criteria:

-None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Implementation Facilitation
The foundation of CONDUIT's implementation activities are the structured interactions between external facilitation teams and internal facilitation teams. A core set of internal facilitation activities will be used across all facilitation teams, and external facilitation teams will use additional activities based on the needs of their sites or clinical settings.

The foundation of CONDUIT's implementation activities are the structured interactions between external facilitation teams and internal facilitation teams. A core set of internal facilitation activities will be used across all facilitation teams, and external facilitation teams will use additional activities based on the needs of their sites or clinical settings.

The pre-implementation period served as a comparison condition

Other Names:
  • Pre-implementation
Other: Pre-Implementation
The pre-implementation period was a period of needs assessment and information-gathering and served as a within-subject comparison condition.

The foundation of CONDUIT's implementation activities are the structured interactions between external facilitation teams and internal facilitation teams. A core set of internal facilitation activities will be used across all facilitation teams, and external facilitation teams will use additional activities based on the needs of their sites or clinical settings.

The pre-implementation period served as a comparison condition

Other Names:
  • Pre-implementation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients Within Participating Sites With OUD Initiating MOUD During the Implementation Facilitation Period in Implementation Sites. This Will be Compared to Pre-implementation.
Time Frame: The implementation period varies by site and will likely range from 6 months to 18 months. The pre-implementation is the 12-month period before implementation.
Data will be extracted from patients electronic health records and reported at the site level. The denominator for this measure is the number of patients within participating sites eligible to receive MOUD at the site during the target period. This outcome will be compared to pre-implementation.
The implementation period varies by site and will likely range from 6 months to 18 months. The pre-implementation is the 12-month period before implementation.
Number of Patients Within Participating Sites With OUD Retained on MOUD at 90 Days During the Implementation Period (i.e. Treatment Retention). This Will be Compared to Pre-implementation.
Time Frame: The implementation period varies by site and will likely range from 6 months to 18 months. The pre-implementation is the 12-month period before implementation.
Data will be extracted from patients electronic health records. The denominator for this measure is the number of patients within participating sites receiving MOUD at the time of the site-specific implementation periods.
The implementation period varies by site and will likely range from 6 months to 18 months. The pre-implementation is the 12-month period before implementation.
Number of Providers Prescribing MOUD During Implementation
Time Frame: The implementation period varies by site and will likely range from 6 months to 18 months. The pre-implementation is the 12-month period before implementation.
The number of prescribing providers will be determined by electronic health record. This is a frequency count. The outcome will be compared to pre-implementation.
The implementation period varies by site and will likely range from 6 months to 18 months. The pre-implementation is the 12-month period before implementation.
Number of Unique Implementation Strategies Used as Measured by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) Survey
Time Frame: The survey was administered 3-4 months following the start of the study as a baseline measure for comparison to follow-up.
Number of unique implementation strategies.
The survey was administered 3-4 months following the start of the study as a baseline measure for comparison to follow-up.
Number of Providers With X-waiver During the Implementation Period
Time Frame: The implementation period varies by site and will likely range from 6 months to 18 months. Pre-implementation is the 12 months prior to implementation.
The outcome will be measured by electronic health records. This is a frequency count of providers with X-waivers (for eligibility to prescribe buprenorphine) during the implementation phase. It will be compared to pre-implementation.
The implementation period varies by site and will likely range from 6 months to 18 months. Pre-implementation is the 12 months prior to implementation.
Count of Implementation Strategies as Measured by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) Survey
Time Frame: The survey was administered 12 months following a baseline measure (equivalent to 16 months following the start of the CONDUIT trial)
Number of unique implementation strategies .
The survey was administered 12 months following a baseline measure (equivalent to 16 months following the start of the CONDUIT trial)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients With OUD Who Experienced a Fatal Opioid-related or Other Drug Overdose During Implementation
Time Frame: This outcome is measured for first 12 months of the implementation phase and compared to the measure for the pre-implementation period.
Data will be extracted from patients electronic health records. Patients experienced an overdose if we observe any recorded overdose events within the first 12 months of the phase. Overdoses are not exclusively opioid-related, but include only fatal events. Counts in the first 12 months of the implementation facilitation period are compared to counts in the 12-month pre-implementation period.
This outcome is measured for first 12 months of the implementation phase and compared to the measure for the pre-implementation period.
Percentage of Patients With OUD Who Experienced Opioid-related or Other Drug Overdose During Implementation
Time Frame: This outcome is measured for first 12 months of the implementation phase and is compared to the 12-month pre-implementation period.
Data will be extracted from patients electronic health records. Patients experienced an overdose if we observe any recorded overdose events within the first 12 months of the phase. Overdoses are not exclusively opioid-related, and include both fatal and nonfatal events. Counts in the first 12 months of the implementation facilitation period are compared to counts in the 12-month pre-implementation period.
This outcome is measured for first 12 months of the implementation phase and is compared to the 12-month pre-implementation period.
Use of Sedative Prescriptions During Implementation Among Patients With OUD
Time Frame: The implementation period varies by site and will likely range from 6 months to 18 months. This outcome is compared to 12-month the pre-implementation period.
This is the count/percentage of people exposed to any sedative prescriptions as determined by patients' electronic health records.
The implementation period varies by site and will likely range from 6 months to 18 months. This outcome is compared to 12-month the pre-implementation period.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: William C Becker, MD, VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 7, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Opioid Medication Assisted Treatment

Clinical Trials on Implementation Facilitation

Subscribe