3D-HD Optic Systems Influence Surgical Performance

September 11, 2021 updated by: Víctor Turrado-Rodríguez, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Improvement in Surgical Performance With 3D High Definition Systems: Olympus VISERA ELITE II 3D

Randomized controlled trial in which two different laparoscopic systems: standard 2D and Olympus VISERA Elite II 3D will be compared in terms of laparoscopic skills, length of surgery, intraoperative complications and surgeon's fatigue in a group of senior surgeons and senior residents will be measured when performing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The introduction of minimally invasive surgery has faced the surgeon with some difficulties that were not present in traditional open surgery. The foremost disadvantage of laparoscopy is the loss of depth perception in 2-dimensional (2D) vision while having to operate in a 3-dimensional (3D) space.

Minimally invasive surgery has become the standard approach for most of the abdominal surgical procedures. It is associated with less surgical trauma, faster recovery, shorter hospital stay and better cosmetic results. These advantages have led laparoscopic skills to become a basic competence for general surgery programs. Advanced laparoscopic surgery involves a long learning curve, including demanding minimally invasive skills such as intracorporeal suturing and knot tying.

Video quality is critical for an accurate training. This is especially important for advanced laparoscopic skills training, where high-definition cameras are needed. HD imaging has been shown to provide subjectively improved image for visualization and to improve surgical task performance.

Some authors have investigated the effect of laparoscopic 3-dimensional view, and have demonstrated an improvement in speed, efficiency, optics and handling as well as surgeon's subjective assessment. Moreover, 3D systems have been demonstrated to provide better optical visualization that allows simpler presentation of anatomical structures, which can decrease intraoperative errors and postoperative morbidity secondary to visual distortions and may reduce postoperative fatigue of the surgeon.

The hypothesis of the study is that the length of surgery is reduced with the use of 3D laparoscopic systems compared with 2D laparoscopic systems, the reduction on the length of surgery will be higher on the training surgeons compared with the senior surgeons, and that the use of 3D laparoscopic systems reduces the postoperative fatigue of the surgeons.

In this study a group of full-trained surgeons and of 4th and 5th year General Surgery Residents performing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass will be randomized into the use of 2D standard laparoscopic optics or 3D laparoscopic optics.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

102

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Recruiting
        • Victor Turrado-Rodriguez
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Morbid obesity (BMI > 30)
  • Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass candidates

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-obese patients.
  • Candidates to other surgical procedures than laparoscopic gastric bypass

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 3D Optic Surgeons
Full-trained surgeons randomised into this interventional arm will be performing laparoscopic gastric bypass using a 3D optic system.
Use of the 3D Optic System "Olympus VISERA Elite II 3D"
No Intervention: 2D Optic Surgeons
Full-trained surgeons randomised into this interventional arm will be performing laparoscopic gastric bypass using a 2D optic system.
Experimental: 3D Optic Residents
4th and 5th year General Surgery residentes randomised into this interventional arm will be performing laparoscopic gastric bypass using a 3D optic system.
Use of the 3D Optic System "Olympus VISERA Elite II 3D"
No Intervention: 2D Optic Residents
4th and 5th year General Surgery residentes randomised into this interventional arm will be performing laparoscopic gastric bypass using a 2D optic system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of Surgery
Time Frame: Day 1
Total time to perform the jejuno-jejunal anastomosis and closure of the mesenteric defect.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraoperative complications
Time Frame: Day 1
Record of the intraoperative complications that may occur during the procedure (bleeding, bowel injury, mesenteric injury, disruption of the anastomotic suture)
Day 1
Profile of Mood States (POMS)
Time Frame: Day 1
Measurement of self-perceived fatigue using the POMS scale
Day 1
Quick Questionnaire Piper Fatigue Scale (QPFS)
Time Frame: Day 1
Measurement of self-perceived fatigue using QPFS
Day 1
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) - related fatigue
Time Frame: Day 1
Fatigue measured using the VAS
Day 1
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: 90 days after surgery
Classification of the postoperative complications using the Clavien-Dindo Classification
90 days after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 12, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HCB/2018/1203

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fatigue

Clinical Trials on 3D Optic System (Olympus VISERA Elite II 3D)

3
Subscribe