EGD vs EUS in Diagnosing Portal Hypertension in Cirrhotic Patients.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound Evaluation Versus Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension in Cirrhotic Patients

Liver cirrhosis with the further development of portal hypertension implies structural and vasculature alteration in the portosplenic circulation.

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy is the standard of care for the detection and treatment of esophageal varices, as esophageal varices serve as a surrogate for estimating a portal pressure gradient > 10 mmHG.

Endoscopic ultrasound evaluation allows the detection of peri-esophageal collateral veins, perforating veins and para-esophageal collateral veins, which has demonstrated to be effective for the prediction of esophageal varices recurrence after variceal eradication.

The investigators aimed to compare esophagogastroduodenoscopy versus endoscopic ultrasound evaluation for the early diagnosis of portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A randomized control trial of 70 cirrhotic patients randomly submitted for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (35 patients) or EUS evaluation (35 patients) for the diagnosis of portal hypertension.

The portal pressure gradient will be defined based on portal vein catheterization via interventional radiology.

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy will evaluate the presence and grade of esophageal varices, presence and type of gastric varices, presence and signs of hypertensive gastropathy.

Endoscopic ultrasound will evaluate the presence of esophageal varices, the presence of gastric varices and the EUS- signs og hypertensive gastropathy, Azygos vein diameter, mean velocity and blood flow volume index.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guayas
      • Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador, 090505
        • Recruiting
        • Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Diseases
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Carlos A Robles-Medranda, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Roberto A Oleas, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Above 18 years old
  • Willingness to participate in the study
  • Compensated liver cirrhosis based on clinical and imaging findings
  • Written informed consent provided

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Decompensated liver cirrhosis: ascitis, encephalopathy, gastrointestinal bleeding, infection
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Pregant or nursing patients
  • Patients with history of esophageal, gastric, liver, pancreas and spleen tumors
  • Severe uncontrolled coagulopathy
  • Any contraindication for portal pressure gradient meassurement via radiological evaluation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: EGD evaluation
Esophogagastroduodenoscopy for the evaluation of esophageal varices, gastric varices and hypertensive gastropathy. Portal pressure gradient will be evaluated via interventional radiology as gold standard.
Esophogagastroduodenoscopy for the evaluation of esophageal varices, gastric varices and hypertensive gastropathy. Portal pressure gradient will be evaluated via interventional radiology as gold standard.
Experimental: EUS evaluation

Endoscopic ultrasound evaluation for the presence of esophageal varices, peri and para-esophageal collateral veins, gastric varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy, azygos vein diameter, blood flow and BFVI.

Portal pressure gradient will be evaluated via interventional radiology as gold standard.

Endoscopic ultrasound evaluation for the presence of esophageal varices, peri and para-esophageal collateral veins, gastric varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy, azygos vein diameter, blood flow and BFVI.

Portal pressure gradient will be evaluated via interventional radiology as gold standard.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnosis of portal hypertension
Time Frame: During portal pressure gradient meassurement up to 4 weeks after randomization
Portal hypertension diagnosis based on portal pressure gradient
During portal pressure gradient meassurement up to 4 weeks after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
diagnostic accuracy of esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Time Frame: during esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedure up to 2 weeks after randomization
Overall accuracy of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the detection and grading of esophageal varices, gastric varices and hypertensive gastropathy.
during esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedure up to 2 weeks after randomization
diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound
Time Frame: during endoscopic ultrasound evaluation up yo 2 weeks after randomization
Overall accuracy of endoscopc ultrasound evaluation in the detection and grading of esophageal varices, gastric varices and hypertensive gastropathy.
during endoscopic ultrasound evaluation up yo 2 weeks after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 9, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Portal Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Subscribe