Thermocoagulation for Treatment of Precancerous Cervical Lesions

January 5, 2023 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

Cervical Cancer Screening Among HIV-infected Women in Western Kenya: Evaluation of the Safety, Acceptability, and Efficacy of an Alternative Ablation Method for Treatment of Precancerous Lesions

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, acceptability, and efficacy of Thermocoagulation for treatment of precancerous lesions among HIV-positive women in a screen-and-treat program in Western Kenya.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Thermocoagulation is endorsed as an alternative to Cryotherapy for treatment of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) or Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-positive women by the 2018 Kenya national cancer guidelines.32 Data primary from Western countries demonstrate similar efficacy for the treatment of precancerous lesions between Cryotherapy and Thermocoagulation. Data on safety, acceptability, and efficacy, particularly linked to gold-standard pathology, among HIV-positive women in low-resource settings are scare. Given the demonstrated benefits over cryotherapy including increased portability and availability hence easier implementation, use of thermal coagulation for the treatment of precancerous lesions in low resource settings could significantly improve access to treatment compared with cryotherapy.

This study seeks to fill a critical data gap by evaluating the efficacy of thermocoagulation among HIV-positive positive women using gold-standard biopsy for disease verification at baseline and follow-up, as indicated. We will also assess the safety and acceptability of this treatment modality among patients and providers

Aim 1: To evaluate the efficacy of thermal coagulation for the treatment of HIV-positive, HPV-positive women by assessing rates of HPV persistence and CIN2/3 rate at 12 months after treatment

Aim 2: To evaluate the safety and acceptability of thermal coagulation for treatment of abnormal cervical lesions within a screen-and-treat program among HIV-positive women in Western Kenya.

Aim 3: Evaluate provider acceptability of thermal coagulation for the treatment of precancerous cervical lesion within a screen-and-treat program in Western Kenya.

Outline:

Counseling on HPV, cervical cancer, and the screening process was offered during routine HIV clinics in group and individual settings. Participants will then be provided self-sampling instructions, a collection kit, and a private area to perform self-collection. The self-collected HPV samples will be labeled, stored, and processed for DNA of 14 high-risk HPV types. HPV-positive participants were invited for a return visit, including a pelvic examination and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) to determine eligibility for ablative therapy. After ablation, a questionnaire will be administered to participants to evaluate treatment experience. All participants will be given a 4- to 6-week phone or in-person follow-up appointment, per participant preference

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

379

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kisumu, Kenya
        • Kenya Medical Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 25-65 years.
  2. Enrolled in HIV care at FACES-supported clinics in Kisumu County.
  3. Able to understand a written informed consent document, and willing to sign it.
  4. Speaks a language that the consent form and data collection instruments are written in.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Has a history of cervical cancer.
  2. Has received any treatment for cervical precancer after screening positive for precancer.
  3. Has evidence of cervical infection.
  4. Pregnant women are excluded from this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Thermocoagulation
Thermal ablation of cervix for treatment of CIN2/3 among HIV-positive participants will be performed by a trained, non-physician clinician. Thermocoagulation will last approximately 20 seconds and will be performed using the Liger Thermocoagulator device
Treatment of positive screening results will be performed using the Liger Thermocoagulator device
Other Names:
  • Liger thermocoagulator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Participants With no Evidence of Cervical Dysplasia at 12-months
Time Frame: 12 months
The proportion of participants with no evidence of cervical dysplasia at 12-months follow-up, defined as biopsy-confirmed CIN1 result or normal findings, 12-months following treatment.
12 months
Proportion of Participants With Persistent HPV at 12-month Follow-up
Time Frame: 12 months
The proportion of persistence of HPV at follow-up will be reported defined as treatment failure with persistent biopsy-confirmed CIN2/3.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of Pain Score Category
Time Frame: Day of Treatment, approximately 1 day
A 4-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain assessment was used to evaluate pain immediately after treatment. The pain VAS was comprised of verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme. The pain VAS is self-completed by the respondent. The respondent is asked to select the point that represents their pain intensity. The "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity. The following cut points on the pain VAS have been recommended: no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain (5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75- 100 mm).
Day of Treatment, approximately 1 day
Percentage of Participants Reporting Treatment-related Adverse Events (AE)
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks following treatment
The percentage of participants reporting grade 2 and higher AEs, and severe adverse events (SAEs) during the 4-week follow-up will be reported by event.
Up to 6 weeks following treatment
Frequency of Positive Participant Satisfaction Responses
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks following treatment
Participant satisfaction with thermocoagulation will be evaluated by determining the proportion of participants indicating a response of 'yes' to the question "Do you feel satisfied with the treatment you received?" with an alternative response of 'no' at the 4-6 week follow-up visit.
Up to 6 weeks following treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chemtai Mungo, MD, MPH, University of California, San Francisco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 25, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HPV Infection

Clinical Trials on Thermocoagulation

3
Subscribe