PARK-FIT. Treadmill vs Cycling in Parkinson´s Disease. Definition of the Most Effective Model in Gait Reeducation

December 10, 2019 updated by: Sabela Novo Ponte, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital

Treadmill vs Cycling in Parkinson´s Disease Rehabilitation. Non-pharmacological, Randomized, Blind Rater, Clinical Trial for the Definition of the Most Effective Model in Gait Reeducation

PARK-FIT Treadmill vs Cycling in Parkinson´s Disease Rehabilitation. Non-pharmacological Clinical Trial for the Definition of the Most Effective Model in Gait Reeducation.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Treadmill vs Cycling in Parkinson´s Disease Rehabilitation. Non-pharmacological Clinical Trial for the Definition of the Most Effective Model in Gait Reeducation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain, 28222

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson's disease according to criteria from the United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank (UK-PDSBB)
  • H&Y less than or equal to 2
  • Stable drug treatment in the six weeks prior to the start of training and during the study.
  • Signature of informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of other neuro-degenerative disease
  • Cardiovascular disease or other systemic condition that contraindicates the moderate physical exercise
  • Need for ambulation support
  • Frequent freezing of gait events.
  • Mni- Mental State Examination (MMSE) <26

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: treadmill training
Three training sessions per week for two months of treadmill. The intensity of exercise is monitored through the heart rate (HR). Patients ought to maintain a HR between 40 and 50% of the reserve HR
treadmill training and cycling training in equal intensity exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Cycling
Three training sessions per week for two months of cycling. The intensity of exercise is monitored through the heart rate (HR). Patients ought to maintain a HR between 40 and 50% of the reserve HR
treadmill training and cycling training in equal intensity exercise.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in step length after treadmill training or cycling.
Time Frame: Ten months
Highlight changes in the length of the step after training in treadmill or cycling in patients with Parkinson´s disease.
Ten months
Changes in step length after treadmill training. Discussion of its specificity to Parkinson´s disease
Time Frame: Ten months
A description of step length and cadence for different velocities of gait after treadmill training.
Ten months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rating Scale for Gait Evaluation in Parkinson's disease ( RSGE- PD scale )
Time Frame: Ten months
Gait status through the RSGE-PD Scale before and after the intervention.
Ten months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Movement Disorders Society- Unified Parkinson´s Disease Rating Scale II. (MDS-UPDRS II)
Time Frame: Ten months
Motor functional status through the MDS-UPDRS II Scale before and after the intervention.
Ten months
MDS-UPDRS III
Time Frame: Ten months
Motor examination status through the MDS UPDRS III Scale before and after the intervention
Ten months
The 39-item Parkinson´s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)
Time Frame: Ten months
Quality of life through the PDQ 39 Scale before and after the intervention.,
Ten months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 9, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Non pharmacological therapy

3
Subscribe