Effectiveness of Rehabilitation in Adults Suffering From Persistent Concussion Symptoms

October 2, 2023 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

Effectiveness of Targeted Individualized Multi-modal Treatments in Adults Suffering From Persistent Concussion Symptoms as Compared to Usual Care

Protocol Summary

The present study was developed to better understand the effects and benefits of individualizing rehabilitative treatments based on subgroup classifications determined by a standardized clinical examination. The primary aim is to evaluate the response to individualized therapy on recovery, as measured by The Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) and standardized clinical examination, when compared to an active control. The secondary aim is to evaluate the Pre and Post treatment state of the participants via a rapid advanced electroencephalography (EEG) when compared to the active control who will be provided the current standard form of therapy for persistent symptoms. The EEG changes will be compared to the standardized clinical examination findings as well as the RPQ.

Sample Size:

N= 50

Study Population

Participants will be eligible for study participation if they meet the following inclusion criteria: 21-years and older; diagnosed with postconcussion syndrome; and have adequate language skills in English to read and take part in rehabilitation treatment program. Participants will be excluded should: they have an unremarkable or normal clinical examination; have a chronic infectious disease; uncontrolled hypertension; other neurological disorders (not attributed to their primary diagnosis); cancer treatment (other than basal cell carcinoma), craniotomy, or refractory subdural hematoma long-term use of psychoactive medications that would compromise their ability to comprehend and perform study activities; those with pacemakers or elevated cardiovascular risk; ongoing litigation surrounding their injury; have been diagnosed with a moderate or severe brain injury prior to enrolment; post-concussive symptoms persisting beyond 12-months.

Study Design

The investigators will be conducting a 12-week case-crossover randomized controlled trial. Participants will undergo 6-weeks of care in their respective streams. After 6-weeks, participants will undergo a re-examination. They will then crossover and undertake the alternative treatment for 6-weeks. At the end of 12-weeks, participants will undertake the endpoint examinations.

Start Date:

May 2023

End Date:

September 2025

Primary Objective:

The primary aim is to evaluate the response to individualized therapy on recovery, as measured by The Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) and standardized clinical examination, when compared to an active control.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background and Rationale

Disabilities secondary to traumatic brain injury are a major source of burden. Numerous treatments have been utilized and studied in an attempt to treat persistent postconcussive symptoms. However, the majority of clinical trials examined the efficacy of a single treatment. Given mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a heterogenous condition characterized by a variety of clinical presentations, one could assume a lack of recovery or response to therapy when done in isolation.

The present study was developed to better understand the effects of individualized rehabilitative care in concussion patients. Specifically, the investigators seek to better understand the effects and benefits of individualizing rehabilitative treatments based on subgroup classifications determined by a standardized clinical examination. The investigators' intention is to establish a treatment methodology based on subgroup classification to individualized rehabilitative treatment programs. The primary aim is to evaluate the response to individualized therapy on recovery, as measured by The Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) and standardized clinical examination, when compared to an active control. The secondary aim is to evaluate the Pre and Post treatment state of the participants via a rapid advanced EEG when compared to the active control who will be provided the current standard form of therapy for persistent symptoms. The electrophysiological changes will be compared to the standardized clinical examination findings as well as the RPQ.

Hypothesis

The investigators hypothesize that participants suffering from persistent post-concussive symptoms, with dominant somatic features, undergoing an individualized rehabilitation program derived from subgroup classification will demonstrate clinically meaningful and statistically significant improved RPQ scores when compared to the active control who will be provided the current standard form of therapy for persistent symptoms. Additionally, the investigators expect significantly improved brain vital sign as measured by rapid EEG, which will serve as a biomarker to confirm the clinical changes.

The investigators will be conducting a 12-week case-crossover randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomized at baseline to either the individualized care program or an active control. No washout period will be used between interventions. It was assumed that given both interventional groups have a focus on rehabilitative therapy that no wash-out period was needed. Participants will undergo 6-weeks of care in their respective streams. After 6-weeks, participants will undergo a re-examination. They will then crossover and undertake the alternative treatment for 6-weeks. At the end of 12-weeks, participants will undertake the endpoint examinations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2A2
        • Recruiting
        • Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 21-years and older
  • meet the definition of postconcussion syndrome, which requires a participant to report any 3 symptoms or more (from an inclusive list of 40 most commonly reported persisting symptoms) lasting at least 1-month following the diagnosis of a concussion. Concussion was defined according to the 5th International Consensus Statement on Concussion in Sport.
  • Have adequate language skills in English to read and take part in rehabilitation treatment program.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • In-patients at Toronto Rehabilitation Institute or any other affiliated University Health Network clinics.
  • Participants will be excluded should their clinical examination be unremarkable for objective physical impairments,
  • Have a chronic infectious disease,
  • Uncontrolled hypertension,
  • Other neurological disorders (not attributed to their primary diagnosis),
  • Cancer treatment (other than basal cell carcinoma), craniotomy, or refractory subdural hematoma long-term use of psychoactive medications that would compromise their ability to comprehend and perform study activities, those with pacemakers or elevated cardiovascular risk,
  • Ongoing litigation surrounding their injury,
  • Have been diagnosed with a moderate or severe brain injury prior to enrolment, post-concussive symptoms persisting beyond 12-months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Individualized care program
Participants in the individualized care stream, will be provided reassurance and psychoeducation via the bio-psycho-social model on understanding persistent symptoms consistent with usual care. Additionally, they will be afforded up to 12 treatments over the course of 6-weeks. Treatments will be standardized; however, given the heterogeneity of symptoms, components of the treatments will be individualized to the participants based on what subgroup they're classified into at baseline based on their initial clinical examination and self-reported dominant impairment. Regardless of subgroup classification, as part of individualized care, all patients will receive reassurance and psychoeducation about the bio-psycho-social understanding of persistent symptoms, including advice on adaptive illness behaviours, such as gradually resuming premorbid activities and avoiding excessive rest and "all-or-nothing behaviour".
Treatments will be standardized but components of the treatments will be individualized to the participants based on what subgroup they're classified into at baseline based on their initial clinical examination and self-reported dominant impairment. *Physiological group - Participants will receive supervised sub-symptom aerobic exercise 20-minutes twice per week and mindfulness-based training 20-minutes twice per week. *Cervical group - Participants will receive physical therapy to the cervical spine. Physical therapy will include soft tissue therapy directed to the cervical myofascial tissues, and graded cervical spine facet mobilizations. *Vestibulo-Ocular group - Patients classified to vestibulo-ocular subgroup will receive bi-weekly 30-minute individualized oculomotor, vestibular and balance exercises including adaptation exercises, gaze stability exercises, visual-vestibular integration exercises, habituation exercises, static and dynamic balance exercises.
Active Comparator: Usual care
Active control - All participants in the active control group will receive 'usual care', (twice a week for 6 weeks), which will consist of reassurance and psychoeducation via the bio-psycho-social model on understanding persistent symptoms, including advice on adaptive illness behaviours, such as gradually resuming premorbid activities and avoiding excessive rest and "all-or-nothing behaviour". Additionally, participants will be afforded weekly 20-minute supervised progressive sub-symptom aerobic exercise sessions at the KITE clinic under the supervision of study coordinator. They will be instructed to also perform daily 20-minutes of subsymptom aerobic exercise outside the supervised exercise sessions.
All participants in the active control group will receive 'usual care', (twice a week for 6 weeks), which will consist of reassurance and psychoeducation via the bio-psycho-social model on understanding persistent symptoms, including advice on adaptive illness behaviours, such as gradually resuming premorbid activities and avoiding excessive rest and "all-or-nothing behaviour". Additionally, participants will be afforded weekly 20-minute supervised progressive sub-symptom aerobic exercise sessions at the KITE clinic under the supervision of study coordinator NM. They will be instructed to also perform daily 20-minutes of subsymptom aerobic exercise outside the supervised exercise sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rivermead Postconcussion Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline; 6-weeks; 12-weeks

The Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptom Questionnaire (RPQ) is a self-report scale to measure the severity of post-concussive symptoms following a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI).

Each item is rated on a 5-point ordinal scale: 0 = not experienced at all, 1 = no more of a problem, 2 = a mild problem, 3 = a moderate problem, and 4 = a severe problem. The total score is a sum of all items and ranges from 0 to 64 from (best to worst).

Baseline; 6-weeks; 12-weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brain Vital Sign
Time Frame: Baseline; 6-weeks; 12-weeks
Quantitative Electroencephalography (EEG). Brain vital sign as measured by rapid advanced electroencephalography (EEG) via NeuroCatchTM. NeuroCatch® conducts a rapid 6-minute scan to measure and report on three specific event related potentials (ERPs). ERPs are neurophysiological measures that are sensitive to changes in cognitive processing, which allows NeuroCatch® to assess an individual's cognitive brain health across various states. Specifically, the three ERPs, auditory N100 (auditory sensation); auditory oddball P300 (basic attention); and auditory speech processing N400 (cognitive processing) will be evaluated. Standardized normative data exists for all three ERP responses.
Baseline; 6-weeks; 12-weeks
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Baseline; 6-weeks; 12-weeks
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) is an instrument used for making criteria-based diagnoses of depressive and other mental disorders commonly encountered in primary care. To score the instrument, the numbers of all the checked responses under each heading are tallied (not at all=0, several days=1, more than half the days=2, and nearly every day=3). There are nine items / questions scored from 0 = not at all, 1 = several days, 2 = more than half the days, 3 = nearly every day. The total score is a sum of all items and ranges from 0 to 27 (best to worst).
Baseline; 6-weeks; 12-weeks
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: Baseline; 6-weeks; 12-weeks
The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a questionnaire designed to help us better understand how your neck pain affects your ability to manage everyday / life activities. The NDI has become a standard instrument for measuring self-rated disability due to neck pain and is used by both clinicians and researchers. Each of the 10 items scores from 0 to 5: 0 = no disability and 5 = complete. The maximum score is 50.
Baseline; 6-weeks; 12-weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Milos R Popovic, PhD, University Health Network, Toronto

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared with any other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Non-pharmacological Individualized rehabilitative therapy

3
Subscribe