China Q Cohort Study

September 21, 2021 updated by: Xue Qing Yu, Sun Yat-sen University

China Q Cohort Study: an Extended Follow-up Study of PD vs. HD Randomized Trial

The burden of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is increasing worldwide. Although kidney transplantation is the most cost-effective renal replacement therapy, dialysis is still the main way to treat ESRD patients due to the limited kidney donor, with approximately 89% of such dialysis patients receive hemodialysis (HD) and the remainder receive peritoneal dialysis (PD). This distribution of dialysis modality, however, varies widely by health jurisdiction. For instance, more than 97% of dialysis patients are treated with HD in Japan, but more than 50% treated with PD in Mexico. Evidence comparing the two modalities suggests that mortality risks may be comparable, but all evidence come from observational study and there is no randomized controlled trial to compare patient survival between PD and HD due to patients enrollment issue.More importantly, for most health care systems, such as United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Indonesia and China, PD is less expensive than HD. It is possible, then, that a greater global utilization of PD might improve access to renal replacement therapy in less advanced economies.

The investigators have conducted a prospective, randomized, parallel, open-label, multi-center, non-inferiority trial to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with PD versus conventional in-center HD in incident ESKD patients. A total of 1082 ESKD patients were randomly assigned to PD or conventional in-center HD, and 235 patients enrolled in stage 1 with complete measures of the "Burden of Kidney Disease" at both baseline and 48 weeks and 668 patients enrolled in stage 2 were included in analysis. However, this trial was designed to evaluate quality of life between PD and HD and all patients were follow-up 48 weeks. Therefore, in this observational cohort study, the investigators will perform extended follow-up for participants including in analysis . Our primary objective is to evaluate the association of dialysis modality (PD and HD) with all-cause mortality in ESKD patients. The investigators also explore the impact of PD and HD on major cardiovascular event composite (MACE), a composite outcome of MACE and all-cause death, hospitalized myocardial infarction, hospitalized stroke and hospitalized heart failure, healthy utility, dialysis cost, activity of daily living, and changes of RRF, hemoglobin, and other biochemical parameters.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

903

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

End stage kidney disease patients who randomly assigned to receive peritoneal dialysis and conventional in-center hemodialysis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (age ≥ 18 years old) peritoneal dialysis or in-center hemodialysis patient who have been recruited in previous China Q study and who enrolled in SURinD study with complete measures of the "Burden of Kidney Disease" at both baseline and 48 weeks.
  • Will and able to provide the informed consent form (ICF).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients have stopped dialysis due to kidney function recovery or kidney transplantation.
  • Patients refuse to provide consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Peritoneal dialysis group
Patients who randomized to peritoneal dialysis
This is a observational cohort study, and there is no intervention for all participants. Our aim is to evaluate dialysis modality (PD and HD) on patient survival
Hemodialysis group
Patients who randomized to conventional in-center hemodialysis
This is a observational cohort study, and there is no intervention for all participants. Our aim is to evaluate dialysis modality (PD and HD) on patient survival

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants died due to any cause
Time Frame: From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
Patients died due to any cause
From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with major cardiovascular event composite (MACE)
Time Frame: From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
MACE defined as defined as the first occurrence of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or death from cardiovascular causes
From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
Number of Participants with composite outcome of MACE and all-cause death
Time Frame: From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
Patients experience cardiovascular events and death.
From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
Number of Participants with hospitalized myocardial infarction, stroke and heart failure
Time Frame: From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
Patients were hospitalized due to myocardial infarction, stroke and heart failure.
From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
Healthy utility
Time Frame: From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
Healthy utility was assessed by Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form (KDQoL-SF™, version 1.3) questionnaire domain of General health, with a range of 1 to 100 and higher value indicates better healthy utility
From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
Rate of difference in dialysis cost between PD and HD
Time Frame: From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
Dialysis cost is evaluated by budget impact model which is developed by Baxter Healthcare Corporation and is a excel based calculator with higher value indicates higher cost
From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
Changes of activity of daily living
Time Frame: From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
Activity of daily living assessed using Activrty Daily Living (ADL) scale, with a range of 14 to 56 and a score < 14 indicates independent daily living and a higher score indicates serious dependent daily living.
From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
Changes of residual renal function
Time Frame: From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
Residual renal function was evaluated using 24h urine volume and the unit is ml.
From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
Changes of hemoglobin
Time Frame: From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
The unit of hemoglobin is g/L.
From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
Changes of serum phosphors
Time Frame: From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
The unit of serum phosphors is mmol/L.
From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
Changes of serum albumin
Time Frame: From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up
The unit of serum albumin is g/L.
From the first day receiving assigned treatment to the end of 3rd year follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xueqing Yu, yuxq@mail.sysu.edu.cn

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 21, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 13, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • China Q Cohort

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Data share plan will decided before submit manuscript to journal.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemodialysis

Clinical Trials on Dialysis modality

Subscribe