Models of Auditory Hallucination

February 13, 2024 updated by: Yale University
The purpose of this study is to address the shortcoming in clinical hallucination research by causally manipulating the neural loci of conditioned hallucination task behavior in-person in patients with psychosis using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), tracking the impact of this manipulation on the number of times participants with hallucinations report hearing tones that were not presented. With such a causal intervention, the veracity of this explanation of hallucinations will be either validated or disconfirmed. If validated, the task can be further developed as a biomarker for predicting the hallucination onset, guiding, developing or tracking the effects of treatments for hallucinations.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Hallucinations are percepts without stimulus. 70% of patients with schizophrenia suffer distressing auditory hallucinations. Their mere presence increases the risk of suicide. Most reach remission with D2 dopamine receptor blocking drugs after 1 year of adherence. However, 30% of patients have intractable hallucinations, and 50% are non-adherent to their medications, commonly because of unfavorable side-effects - those intractable and non-adherent patients continue to suffer. There is a clear need for a mechanistic understanding of hallucinations as a prelude to rational treatment design.

This study provides the initial steps towards the development of an interventional biomarker for clinical hallucinations, grounded in computational neuroscience.

Computational psychiatry involves harnessing the power of computational neuroscience to address the clinical needs of those suffering from serious mental illnesses. There has been much discussion of the promise of the approach. There have been few studies thus far and they have largely involved correlative methods like functional neuroimaging. This study will address this shortcoming by causally manipulating the neural loci of computational model parameters in-person in patients with psychosis using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), tracking the impact of this manipulation on behavioral task performance . With such a causal intervention, the veracity of the model's explanation of hallucinations will be either validated or disconfirmed. If validated, the model can be further developed as a biomarker for predicting the hallucination onset, guiding, developing or tracking the effects of treatments for hallucinations. If disconfirmed, the model ought to be discarded and other alternatives should be pursued.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06519
        • Connecticut Mental Health Center (CMHC)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 - 45 years
  • Voice hearing patients
  • Meet diagnostic criteria for DSM-V schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder
  • Report hearing voices at least once a day
  • Score > 3 on PANSS P3 (hallucinations item)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • DSM-V substance use disorder within the past 6 months
  • Previous head injury with neurological symptoms and/or unconsciousness
  • Intellectual disability (IQ < 70)
  • Non-English speaker

  • Contraindications for TMS, including:

    • History of seizures
    • Metallic implants
    • Pacemaker
    • Pregnancy
  • Less than 6 weeks of a stable dose of psychotropic medication(s)
  • Comorbid mood or anxiety diagnosis
  • Clinically/behaviorally instability and unable to cooperate with TMS procedures
  • Clinically significant medical condition(s)
  • Unstable medical condition(s) based on EKG, medical history, physical examination, and routine lab work
  • Personal history of stroke
  • Family history of seizures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: TMS to insula

This study will recruit 30 clinical voice hearers (P+H+). They will complete two parallel forms of the conditioned hallucinations task (with different visual and auditory stimuli) on two occasions, separated by a week.

TMS and sham will be delivered in a randomized counterbalanced order. Hypothesis: Inhibiting the insula will decrease prior over-weighting. If this computational perturbation is responsible for conditioned hallucinations, then ameliorating it with TMS that increases insula engagement will decrease conditioned hallucination responses. Furthermore, the prior weighting parameter will be reduced following active TMS compared with sham.
Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive form of brain stimulation in which a changing magnetic field is used to cause electric current at a specific area of the brain through electromagnetic induction. An electric pulse generator, or stimulator, is connected to a magnetic coil, which in turn is connected to the scalp. The stimulator generates a changing electric current within the coil which induces a magnetic field; this field then causes a second inductance of inverted electric charge within the brain itself.
Other Names:
  • repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
Active Comparator: TMS to cerebellum
This study will recruit a further 70 clinical voice hearers. Again, they will complete parallel forms of the conditioned hallucinations task on two occasions, separated by a week. They will receive excitatory TMS over the cerebellum (and sham on the other occasion, in a randomized counterbalanced order). Hypotheses: Exciting the cerebellum will increase belief-updating. If poor belief-updating contributes to conditioned hallucinations, increasing cerebellum engagement should decrease conditioned hallucinations and alter the belief-updating model parameter compared with sham TMS.
Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive form of brain stimulation in which a changing magnetic field is used to cause electric current at a specific area of the brain through electromagnetic induction. An electric pulse generator, or stimulator, is connected to a magnetic coil, which in turn is connected to the scalp. The stimulator generates a changing electric current within the coil which induces a magnetic field; this field then causes a second inductance of inverted electric charge within the brain itself.
Other Names:
  • repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Conditioned Hallucinations Task Performance
Time Frame: approximately 13 months
The primary outcome measure is the number of times participants report hearing tones that were not presented. There are 360 total trials. There are 120 no tone trials. People who hear voices typically report hearing tones on 30% of the no tone trials (approximately 36 times, as compared to 12 times in people who do not hear voices). The investigators anticipate fewer conditioned hallucinations (fewer than 36 reports of tones when none were presented) in the active TMS conditions as compared to the sham.
approximately 13 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Yale University

Collaborators

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philip R Corlett, PhD, Yale School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 27, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2000023640
  • 1R21MH116258-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Uzbekistan

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe