Accuracy of Risk Prediction Scores in Pregnant Women (PREG-GUCH)

January 8, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Accuracy of Risk Prediction Scores in Pregnant Women With Congenital Heart Disease.

Management of pregnancy and risk stratification in congenital heart disease (CHD) population might be challenging especially due to physiological haemodynamic modifications that inevitably occur during pregnancy. We aim to compare the accuracy of the main published scores including CARPREG II score in prediction of maternal complications during pregnancy in CHD patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Since the end of the 20th century, surgical and medical care progresses have significantly improved prognosis and quality of life of patients with congenital heart diseases (CHD). Currently, women with CHD expect to experience a "normal" life and express a strong maternity desire.

During the last decade, several scores have been used to predict outcome of pregnancy in women with cardiovascular heart diseases. It has been suggested that the mWHO classification was more appropriate than the previous ones (e.g. Harris, Zahara and CAPREG classifications) in predicting cardiac complications in CHD. More recently, a new risk score stratification (CARPREG II) have been published to improve maternal risk stratification.

This retrospective study will include all pregnant women with CHD who were follow up in our institution from January 2007 to June 2018 until 6 months postpartum. The investigators will collect demographic and clinical data, type and complexity of CHD (Houyel and Bethesda classification), and pregnancy outcomes. Pregnancy scores will be based on information obtained from the relevant clinical letter and clinical notes. The discriminatory power of each risk scores was assessed by the area-under-the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). In order to assess the reproducibility of scores classification assigned to CHD patients, all pregnancy scores from this cohort were assessed by 3 independent observers and, thereafter, estimated Cronbach's coefficient alpha.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • UH Montpellier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with congenital heart diseases who delivered at Montpellier Universityhospital

Description

Inclusion criteria:

- All patients with congenital heart diseases who deliver in our institution during the study period

Exclusion criteria:

- Women with acquired cardiovascular diseases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
PREG-GUCH
Pregnant women with congenital heart diseases
Pregnancy scores will be based on information obtained from the relevant clinical letter and clinical notes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Cardiovascular complications
Time Frame: From the 20th week of gestation until 6 months post partum
Cardiovascular complications during pregnancy until 6 months post partum
From the 20th week of gestation until 6 months post partum

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 30, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

NC

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy

Clinical Trials on Retrospective observational

Subscribe