Genotype-Informed Versus Empiric Management of VirEmia (GIVE MOVE)

August 18, 2023 updated by: Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute

Genotype-Informed Versus Empiric Management of VirEmia (GIVE MOVE) in HIV-Infected Children and Adolescents on Antiretroviral Therapy: An Open-Label Randomised Clinical Trial

HIV infection can be effectively controlled with antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, children and adolescents living with HIV and receiving ART suffer high rates of treatment failure, predominantly caused by suboptimal adherence to therapy and/or viral drug resistance. While high-income countries routinely use genotypic resistance testing (GRT) to determine which drug combinations are likely to be effective, this diagnostic tool is relatively costly and labour-intensive and is not routinely available in most resource-limited settings.

GIVE MOVE is a multi-country (Lesotho, Tanzania) randomised clinical trial assessing if rapid GRT after detecting an unsuppressed viral load improves the clinical management and thus health outcomes for children and adolescents living with HIV. Children and adolescents with an unsuppressed viral load despite ART are enrolled and randomly allocated to a control or an intervention arm (50% of participants in each arm). The control arm receives care according to the current standard of care, consisting of three sessions of enhanced adherence counselling at monthly intervals, followed by a second viral load test. Onward treatment is informed by the outcome of this viral load test alongside empirical guidelines and clinical judgement. The intervention arm receives GRT and GRT-informed onward therapy. Participants in the intervention arm also receive three sessions of enhanced adherence counselling, which is informed by GRT results (i.e., if no drug resistance is detected, there is a high chance of suboptimal adherence to ART and this can be directly addressed).

This trial will assess if the rapid provision of GRT improves participants' health outcomes at 9 months after enrolment. A nested study will assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of GRT. Thus, this trial will provide evidence on whether the provision of GRT for children and adolescents with HIV should be prioritised in resource-limited settings.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background and rationale:

Children and adolescents living with HIV and receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) suffer high rates of treatment failure, predominantly caused by suboptimal adherence to therapy and/or viral drug resistance. While high-income countries routinely use genotypic resistance testing (GRT) to select an optimal ART regimen, this diagnostic tool is not routinely available in many resource-limited settings.

Objective:

The GIVE MOVE trial assesses if rapid GRT after detection of an unsuppressed viral load in children and adolescents on ART improves health outcomes when compared to the current standard of care. Furthermore, a nested study will assess the cost-effectiveness of this intervention. Combined, these results will provide evidence on whether GRT should be prioritised for children and adolescents with HIV.

Study design:

GIVE MOVE is a multi-centre (several centres in 2 countries, Lesotho and Tanzania), parallel-group (1:1 allocation), open-label randomised clinical trial. Children and adolescents living with HIV with a viral load ≥400 c/mL are enrolled.

The control group is managed as per the current standard of care that follows the World Health Organization guidelines, i.e. three sessions of enhanced adherence counselling at monthly intervals, followed by a second viral load test and viral load-informed onward treatment.

In the intervention arm, participants receive GRT, a GRT-informed treatment recommendation by a GRT Expert Committee, and GRT-informed onward therapy, selecting the best locally available drugs according to the drug resistance profile.

The GIVE MOVE trial will compare clinical outcomes (mortality, morbidity, viral suppression; see the Primary Outcome section for the composite primary endpoint) at nine months. Assuming that 20% vs 35% reach the primary endpoint in the intervention vs control arm, and at a significance level of 5%, 276 participants (138 per arm) are required to reach 80% power.

In addition to clinical outcomes, the trial intends to assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. The GIVE MOVE trial aims at informing future clinical guidelines on the management of paediatric HIV.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

286

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Butha-Buthe, Lesotho
        • Baylor Clinic Butha-Buthe
      • Maseru, Lesotho
        • Baylor Clinic Maseru
      • Mohale's Hoek, Lesotho
        • Baylor Clinic Mohale's Hoek
      • Mokhotlong, Lesotho
        • Baylor Clinic Mokhotlong
    • Butha-Buthe
      • Seboche, Butha-Buthe, Lesotho
        • Seboche Mission Hospital
    • Leribe
      • Hlotse, Leribe, Lesotho
        • Baylor Clinic Leribe
      • Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
        • Mbagala Rangi Tatu Hospital
      • Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
        • Upendano Dispensary
      • Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
        • Temeke Regional Referral Hospital
    • Morogoro
      • Ifakara, Morogoro, Tanzania
        • One-Stop Clinic and Chronic Diseases Clinic (CDCI) at St Francis Referral Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 19 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • In care in a study site
  • Age ≥6 months and <19 years
  • Latest HIV viral load result ≥400 c/mL
  • On an unchanged ART regimen for ≥6 months
  • Phlebotomy for latest viral load test <4 months before screening
  • Consent given

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for treatment switch according to WHO guidelines at screening
  • 1st enhanced adherence counselling (EAC) session initiated >2 weeks prior to screening
  • Intention to transfer out of the study site (and not into a different study site) within 3 months after randomisation
  • Already enrolled in another study if judged as non-compatible by the (Local) Principal Investigator
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding at screening (no exclusion based on pregnancy or breastfeeding after enrolment)
  • Acute illness requiring hospitalisation at screening (no exclusion based on hospitalisation after enrolment)
  • Received a resistance test in the last 12 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
The viral load ≥400 c/mL before enrolment triggers genotypic resistance testing (GRT), followed by GRT-informed patient management and counselling. Onward treatment is informed by the resistance profile determined through GRT, with a GRT Expert Committee issuing a treatment recommendation.

The study intervention will consist of the following components:

  1. Genotypic resistance testing (GRT);
  2. Review of GRT results by an expert committee providing a treatment recommendation;
  3. GRT-based decision on further therapy (switch or maintain current ART regimen; choice of regimen); and
  4. GRT-informed adherence support.
No Intervention: Control
Standard of care according to national guidelines and recommendations of the World Health Organization: The viral load ≥400 c/mL before enrolment is followed by 3 sessions of enhanced adherence counselling and a follow-up viral load test. Onward treatment is informed by viral load testing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite primary endpoint
Time Frame: At 9 months follow-up visit (window: 32-44 weeks)
The composite primary endpoint is the occurrence of any one or more of the events i) death due to any cause during the follow-up period (36 weeks), ii) HIV- or ART-related hospital admission of ≥24 hours duration (possibly, probably or definitely related to HIV or ART, judged by the endpoint committee blinded to the study arm) during the follow-up period (36 weeks), iii) new clinical World Health Organization (WHO) stage IV event (excluding lymph node tuberculosis, stunting, oral or genital herpes simplex infection and oesophageal candidiasis; judged by the endpoint committee blinded to the study arm) during the follow-up period (36 weeks), and iv) no documentation of a suppressed viral load (<50 c/mL) at 9 months follow-up (window: 32-44 weeks). The primary endpoint will be assessed as an event ratio of participants reaching one or more of the composite endpoints.
At 9 months follow-up visit (window: 32-44 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion with death due to any cause
Time Frame: Within 36 weeks after baseline
Proportion of participants confirmed dead during the follow-period among all participants enrolled.
Within 36 weeks after baseline
Proportion with HIV- or ART-related hospital admission of ≥24 hours duration
Time Frame: Within 36 weeks after baseline
Proportion of participants with HIV- or ART-related hospital admission of ≥24 hours duration (possibly, probably or definitely related to HIV or ART, judged by the endpoint committee) during the follow-up period among all participants enrolled.
Within 36 weeks after baseline
Proportion with new clinical WHO stage IV event(s) (with some exclusions)
Time Frame: Within 36 weeks after baseline
Proportion of participants with new clinical WHO stage IV event(s) (excluding lymph node tuberculosis, stunting, oral or genital herpes simplex infection and oesophageal candidiasis; judged by the endpoint committee) during the follow-up period among all participants enrolled.
Within 36 weeks after baseline
Proportion without documentation of a suppressed viral load
Time Frame: At 9 months follow-up visit (window: 32-44 weeks)
Proportion of participants without documentation of viral load <50 c/mL at 9 months among all participants enrolled.
At 9 months follow-up visit (window: 32-44 weeks)
Proportion lost to follow-up
Time Frame: At 9 months follow-up visit (window: 32-44 weeks)
Proportion of participants with no documented clinic visit at 9 months among all participants enrolled.
At 9 months follow-up visit (window: 32-44 weeks)
Proportion with observed virologic failure
Time Frame: At 9 months follow-up visit (window: 32-44 weeks)
Proportion of participants with a viral load ≥50 c/mL among all participants with a viral load result at 9 months.
At 9 months follow-up visit (window: 32-44 weeks)
Composite endpoint
Time Frame: 6 months (window: 20-28 weeks) after the decision on onward treatment
This composite endpoint is the proportion of participants among all participants enrolled experiencing one or more of the events i) death due to any cause within 24 weeks of the decision on onward treatment, ii) HIV- or ART-related hospital admission of ≥24 hours duration (possibly, probably or definitely related to HIV or ART) within 24 weeks of the decision on onward treatment, iii) new clinical WHO stage IV event (excluding lymph node tuberculosis, stunting, oral or genital herpes simplex infection and oesophageal candidiasis) within 24 weeks of the decision on onward treatment, and iv) no documentation of a suppressed viral load (<50 c/mL) at 6 months (window: 20-28 weeks) after the decision on onward treatment. The decision on onward treatment is defined as the first visit after the follow-up viral load result or resistance test result becomes available in the control or intervention arm, respectively.
6 months (window: 20-28 weeks) after the decision on onward treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to viral suppression
Time Frame: 3- (window: 10-14 weeks), 6- (window: 20-28 weeks), and 9-month (window: 32-44 weeks) study visit
Time to achieving a viral load <50 c/mL; considering viral load testing done with samples from the 3-, 6- and 9-month study visit in both arms.
3- (window: 10-14 weeks), 6- (window: 20-28 weeks), and 9-month (window: 32-44 weeks) study visit
Proportion with drug regimen switches in the absence of major drug resistance mutations and/or non-switches in the presence of major drug resistance mutations
Time Frame: Baseline and 9-month (window: 32-44 weeks) study visit
Proportion of participants with drug regimen switches in the absence of major drug resistance mutations and/or non-switches in the presence of major drug resistance mutations among all participants enrolled (as identified by Sanger sequencing, according to the Stanford HIV drug resistance database).
Baseline and 9-month (window: 32-44 weeks) study visit
Proportion with new drug resistance mutations emerged within the study period
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 9-month (window: 32-44 weeks) study visit
Proportion of participants with new drug resistance mutations emerged within the study period among all participants enrolled.
Change from baseline to 9-month (window: 32-44 weeks) study visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer A Brown, PhD, Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
  • Study Director: Josephine Muhairwe, MD, MPH, SolidarMed, Partnerships for Health
  • Study Director: Buntshi P Kayembe, MD, Baylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation Lesotho
  • Study Director: Mosa M Hlasoa, MD, Baylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation Lesotho
  • Study Director: Isaac Ringera, MPH, RN, SolidarMed, Partnerships for Health
  • Study Director: Maja Weisser, MD, Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
  • Study Director: Ezekiel Luoga, MD, Ifakara Health Institute
  • Study Director: Tracy R Glass, PhD, Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
  • Study Chair: Niklaus D Labhardt, MD, MIH, Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
  • Study Director: Thomas Klimkait, PhD, University of Basel

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 8, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P001-20-1.4
  • REG-19-008 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Fondation Botnar)
  • ID 229-2019 (Other Identifier: National Health Research Ethics Committee (Lesotho))
  • Req-2019-01275 (Other Identifier: Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz (Switzerland))
  • 12-2020 (Other Identifier: Ifakara Health Institute Review Board (Tanzania))
  • NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol. IX/3222 (Other Identifier: National Institute for Medical Research (Tanzania))
  • TMDA0020/CTR/0003/03 (Other Identifier: Tanzania Medicines and Medical Devices Authority (Tanzania))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Upon publication of the trial results, a subset of the key pseudo-anonymised individual participant data collected during the study, along with a data dictionary, will be made available through the data repository Zenodo. The full dataset will be made available upon request to the Division of Clinical Epidemiology at the University Hospital Basel and after signing a data confidentiality agreement.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV-1-infection

Clinical Trials on Clinical management informed by HIV-1 genotypic resistance testing

3
Subscribe